Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Feminists / Liberals / Progressives - What is happening?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
boston bean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-12-09 07:22 AM
Original message
Feminists / Liberals / Progressives - What is happening?
Edited on Sat Sep-12-09 07:23 AM by boston bean
AUDIENCE MEMBER: You lie! (Boos.)

THE PRESIDENT: It's not true. And one more misunderstanding I want to clear up -- under our plan, no federal dollars will be used to fund abortions, and federal conscience laws will remain in place. (Applause.)


edit to add transcript link

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2009/09/09/politics/main5299229_page2.shtml?tag=contentMain;contentBody
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
zippy890 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-12-09 07:29 AM
Response to Original message
1. a president tacking to the center to get legislation passed?
American politics kinda like Bill Clinton. except this health care legislation has gotten further along in the process than any other in the history of our country.

by the way, as a fellow bay-stater- do you think Teddy would compromise to get people covered by insurance and increase regulation over the health care industry. Damn right he would.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enlightenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-12-09 07:29 AM
Response to Original message
2. I don't know about anyone else, but I was extremely disappointed
to hear him say that - but NOT surprised.

It has stunning ramifications - much more dangerous than it is currently (which isn't good), because of the wider number of potentially affected individuals. Particularly so because it can be assumed that many who take the public option are already economically disadvantaged.

I suppose it can be argued that there is no guarantee of coverage by private insurance today, which is true - but that doesn't make it right. Still, it's an easy audience to throw under the bus, isn't it? *sigh*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
csziggy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-12-09 07:38 AM
Response to Original message
3. In order to allow abortions, the Hyde Amendment will have to be overturned
Something that is not going to happen anytime soon.

That is a separate fight from getting some form of Health Care enacted. I'm disappointed Obama seems less of a fighter than I had hoped, but not surprised. Democrats have not been fighters for most progressive issues for a very long time.

What's our alternative - vote for real progressives that don't have a chance of getting into office and let the right wingers get their candidates in? As little as we like it, we are better off with centrist Democrats than with any form of Republican in office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
get the red out Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-12-09 08:46 AM
Response to Original message
4. Fighting one political war at a time
No matter how we feel about it, he is being prudent. There is no way he could get any health care passed if it included any abortion funding. I absolutely HATE that, but it is still true, no matter how I feel. There really aren't any moral victories here, if we loose health car reform by going for everything that makes the right (and too much of the so-called middle) foam at the mouth with rage we still end up with many many people dying because they can't get health care. No, that's not optimal, but it is better than sliding even further into the void of almost non-existent coverage and more cries for an outright ban on all abortions.

Very tough spot, but only one political war can be fought at a time. Too many people have been so brain washed against choice that it may take many years of gradually more liberal reforms and legislation to get some sense into people. From association with the people in my local, we are damn lucky every year that abortion isn't criminalized, too many people would like that more than anything. In fact, as anti-abortion as many people are, I voted for the President in hopes of keeping abortion legal enough to keep a call for banning birth control off the radar, that's what the right ultimately wants. We aren't in a good spot on choice in this country and very lucky that there is still a majority of people that don't want it criminalized, since it (and being gay) has become the only sin most churches in the US care about these days. Brain washing has had a huge effect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cally Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-12-09 08:59 AM
Response to Original message
5. Women are thrown under the bus one more time
Edited on Sat Sep-12-09 09:01 AM by cally
He's saying that women won't fight for our rights and we probably won't. I truly wonder if a woman President--Hillary Clinton--would have done this. She's a fierce advocate in the State Department for women.

On edit: I was not a huge Hillary fan for many other reasons. She's a strong supporter of women's rights.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-12-09 09:34 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. Honestly?
I've seen far too many female politicians do the same to think that Hillary would have been any different.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katandmoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-12-09 09:04 AM
Response to Original message
6. I have NEVER seen a president so eager to throw his supporters under the bus as Obama

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Berry Cool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-12-09 09:40 AM
Response to Reply #6
11. I don't think you folks are being fair to call it "throwing under the bus."
The sad part is, this country has backtracked since the 1970s when it comes to women's rights and the wingnuts have convinced a lot of people, through the religious right, that either abortion is EVIL or, if they privately admit they wouldn't want to see themselves or their loved ones without it as an option, they'll be damned if they pay for other people to get one. Then you have the nimrods who don't want to pay for someone else who is DYING OF DISEASE to get well, much less anything else.

In this climate, government-subsidized abortions that are acknowledged as such just aren't going to fly. It's going to take more time for that to happen. Hillary could not make it happen either; don't kid yourself. She would see that clearly and she, too, would do the same as Obama has. Don't lie to yourself and tell yourself that just because she has a vagina she would stick to her guns. She's a politician and she knows what is possible and what is not.

Sadly, I think we have no choice but to wait for the majority of these wackjobs to die off and for a new generation to be in place in which the successfully inculcated children of these wackjobs are a teeny tiny minority. In the meantime, should we go without government subsidized health care just because we can't get the whole pie, including abortions for those who need them?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-12-09 09:32 AM
Response to Original message
7. csziggy is wrong about strategery but right about the Hyde amendment
which made the first statement currently true.

What about the second? "Federal consience laws"? :evilfrown: That allow licensed professionals to refuse to dispense medication, based on their bigotry towards women??

csziggy:
"What's our alternative - vote for real progressives that don't have a chance of getting into office and let the right wingers get their candidates in? As little as we like it, we are better off with centrist Democrats than with any form of Republican in office."

That is arguable at this point.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-12-09 09:33 AM
Response to Original message
8. Yeah, I know
sad to see Democrats hiding behind something as odious as the Hyde amendment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-12-09 09:36 AM
Response to Original message
10. He's following the law of the land. Before we have a collective meltdown
and start stoning the man, know what we are talking about. Currently, the Hyde Amendment is the law of the land and would have to be overturned before federal funds could be used for abortions. This is nothing new.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boston bean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-12-09 09:45 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. The Hyde Amendment is added as a rider every year to the medicaid appropriations.
It prevents women with lesser means access to health care.

Also, what about Bush's 11th hour conscience rule executive order? That is not the "law of the land", it was bush's final gift to the fundies, and can be undone by Obama with a stroke of a pen. But it is being examined by the faithers in Obama's administration. Who knows when he will undo that! Looks like from his statement above, that he will not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC