Hyperconsumption, global warming, and the fall of basic-goods buying power among the middle classBy Richard Clark
A growing percentage of the work most people do these days is necessary only to produce, market, sell, consume and dispose of products and services that are increasingly superfluous. Compare this to the ever lesser amount of work people do to produce those products and services that are of basic or fundamental importance and that meet basic needs.
Now ask yourself this: If (somehow), anyone who wanted to, could join with others of like mind, to work only as much as it took to efficiently and cooperatively produce basic goods and services, and take their fair share, then no one who wanted just these basic things -- housing, food staples, utilities, education, basic health care -- would have to work more than 20 hours a week, 8-9 months a year in order to get these basics.
Obviously most people would, to one extent or another, want more than these basics, and to the extent they did, they could of course work at other jobs to get the money to buy what they wanted. The point is that no one would any longer be forced to work full time, 11 months of the year, in the production of the environmentally damaging superfluous, in order to get all their basic needs met (including health care) in some adequate way.
As several surveys have shown, most people (Caucasians at least) were happier in the 50s and early 60s (when average consumption and incomes were much less) than they are today. So, has all this increased personal consumption benefitted us as much as we think it has? And at what cost to us and the environment has it been provided?
more...
http://www.opednews.com/populum/print_friendly.php?p=opedne_richard__071223_hyperconsumption_cau.htm