|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
grahamhgreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-13-09 08:13 PM Original message |
Obama "BASICALLY KILLED THE PUBLIC OPTION" & stuck the knife in liberals - David Brooks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ixion (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-13-09 08:15 PM Response to Original message |
1. exactly. the windfall is for insurance cos |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Laelth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-13-09 08:15 PM Response to Original message |
2. Hear, hear! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MarjorieG (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-13-09 08:16 PM Response to Original message |
3. Brooks isn't as bad as others, but just as willing to stick his knife unless Obama goes GOP. He |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grahamhgreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-13-09 08:18 PM Response to Reply #3 |
4. Did Obama say the bill MUST HAVE A PUBLIC OPTION? NO! Only that you must PAY OR BE PUNISHED! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bluestateguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-13-09 08:20 PM Response to Original message |
5. No he didn't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grahamhgreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-13-09 08:24 PM Response to Reply #5 |
7. How cogent - how bout an example of where he has said a public option MUST be in the bill. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-13-09 08:21 PM Response to Original message |
6. Does he have some newfound credibility or something? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grahamhgreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-13-09 08:28 PM Response to Reply #6 |
10. He is a propagandist, but it is easy to say "I will not vote for a bill unless it has a strong |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-13-09 08:31 PM Response to Reply #10 |
12. If he does that, reconciliation for a public option may be out. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SemiCharmedQuark (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-13-09 09:29 PM Response to Reply #6 |
25. That was my question. Since when do we give a crap what David Brooks thinks? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Old and In the Way (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-13-09 08:25 PM Response to Original message |
8. Really? I thought Congress dictates the legislation? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KittyWampus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-13-09 08:26 PM Response to Original message |
9. LOL! Scraping the bottom of the barrel with Brooks? Okay, not the bottom. Just the sides. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grahamhgreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-13-09 08:31 PM Response to Reply #9 |
11. I wonder how many days we'll have to look over the bill before it's voted on. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
smoogatz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-13-09 08:37 PM Response to Original message |
13. Yes, David Brooks always has the best interests of his liberal friends at heart. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hfojvt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-13-09 08:49 PM Response to Reply #13 |
15. Yeah I had much the same thought about a George Will column |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hfojvt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-13-09 08:45 PM Response to Original message |
14. he said much the same thing in his recent column |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
theophilus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-13-09 08:52 PM Response to Original message |
16. Brooks = FAIL, imo. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stray cat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-13-09 09:01 PM Response to Original message |
17. DU places their trust in David Brooks? Is Rush next? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-13-09 09:13 PM Response to Reply #17 |
22. As long as it's anti-Obama, DUers will love anything. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cliffordu (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-14-09 12:14 AM Response to Reply #22 |
32. True dat.../ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
d_b (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-13-09 09:06 PM Response to Original message |
18. lol brooks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spanone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-13-09 09:07 PM Response to Original message |
19. fuck off david brooks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blogslut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-13-09 09:12 PM Response to Original message |
20. You mean this David Brooks? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-13-09 09:12 PM Response to Original message |
21. Once again, it's difficult to tell the difference between DUers and right wingers... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KoKo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-13-09 09:18 PM Response to Reply #21 |
23. Well... when the RW starts to wake up....there's gonna' be Hell to Pay! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grantcart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-13-09 09:18 PM Response to Original message |
24. and David Brooks has been right about what |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-13-09 09:31 PM Response to Reply #24 |
26. Nothing, other than knowing how to manipulate dumbass Democrats |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
prolesunited (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-13-09 09:35 PM Response to Original message |
27. " LET'S GO BACK TO SINGLE PAYER" ?!?!? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grahamhgreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-14-09 12:07 AM Response to Reply #27 |
29. Buy insurance from a con artist or get fined? That's the plan? RU serious? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
northernlights (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-13-09 09:41 PM Response to Original message |
28. I'm taking that as good news |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
G_j (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-14-09 12:10 AM Response to Original message |
30. shouldn't need Brooks to tell us anything... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kid a (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-14-09 12:10 AM Response to Original message |
31. bwahahaha ahahahahaha ahahahahaha ahahahaha ahahahhahaha ahahaha |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cliffordu (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-14-09 12:16 AM Response to Original message |
33. I sure wish you or he knew what the fuck you're trying to talk about. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grahamhgreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-14-09 12:33 AM Response to Reply #33 |
35. No public option + mandatory insurance = you pay taxes to a corporation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cliffordu (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-14-09 12:43 AM Response to Reply #35 |
36. Can I see a bill on the way to his desk before the doomers and gloomers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hansel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-14-09 12:17 AM Response to Original message |
34. Whatever. He sounded pretty positive about it yesterday |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri Apr 19th 2024, 10:03 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC