|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
johnaries (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-13-09 09:35 PM Original message |
How to make opposition to the Public Option magically disappear. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-13-09 09:38 PM Response to Original message |
1. Sounds basically right to me... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KittyWampus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-13-09 11:22 PM Response to Reply #1 |
12. that also sounds like what Obama said during his speech and pretty much this whole year. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Parker CA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-13-09 09:40 PM Response to Original message |
2. Seems too reasonable a proposition to actually be accepted by insurance corps, I like it though. nt. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hello_Kitty (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-13-09 09:43 PM Response to Original message |
3. Actually some here will oppose your idea because they won't budge on the mandate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-13-09 09:45 PM Response to Original message |
4. there you go, rec |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cleita (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-13-09 09:45 PM Response to Original message |
5. But how do they say voila! to the people who are giving them money |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
johnaries (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-13-09 09:52 PM Response to Reply #5 |
7. Well, that's a deeper ongoing problem. And one I don't think |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ramulux (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-13-09 09:48 PM Response to Original message |
6. Not gonna happen.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
johnaries (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-13-09 09:56 PM Response to Reply #6 |
9. Well, that's basically what I'm saying. NO mandate without a PO. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
creeksneakers2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-13-09 09:53 PM Response to Original message |
8. Better to kill the whole bill |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TlalocW (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-13-09 10:40 PM Response to Original message |
10. When I saw your subject line |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
johnaries (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-13-09 11:17 PM Response to Reply #10 |
11. Sssssh, that' Plan B now, since "Operation Bag the Teabaggers" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WillowTree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-14-09 12:14 AM Response to Original message |
13. What you're forgetting is that pesky little pre-existing conditions clause. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
johnaries (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-14-09 11:12 PM Response to Reply #13 |
17. Well, at least in HR3200 that won't be a problem. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-14-09 12:50 AM Response to Original message |
14. sure. but the corps own the solons. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Festivito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-14-09 10:10 AM Response to Original message |
15. Easier, have CBO COST the option. At 3k versus more $ for less care. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
johnaries (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-14-09 11:07 PM Response to Original message |
16. Shameless, self-aggrandizing kick. Because I think it may work. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 05:18 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC