Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"How the GOP got hijacked by Right-Wing Authoritarians"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Emit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-14-09 10:35 AM
Original message
"How the GOP got hijacked by Right-Wing Authoritarians"
How the GOP got hijacked by Right-Wing Authoritarians

As we are witness the unfolding of a rather bizarre health care debate, one can't help but be amazed at the jaw dropping lunacy of the folks on the right who are amply represented by an assembly of "creationists" "birthers", "teabaggers", "screamers" and now "deathers"...

~snip~

... "Conservatives Without Conscience" by John W. Dean, prolific author and former Watergate figure. In a stunning tour de force, Dean's book answered all my questions regarding the apparent success of the right wing to mobilize the pathetic remnants of a once proud confederacy. In chapter two, Mr. Dean postulates that these new conservatives, both its leaders as well as its followers, fit into a distinct personality type described as "Right-Wing Authoritarianism".

In the book, Dean highlights the work of social psychologist and researcher Bob Altemeyer of the University of Manitoba. According to Altemeyer, Right-Wing Authoritarians are especially submissive to established authority and show a general aggressiveness toward others when such behavior is perceived to be sanctioned by established authorities.

At the end of Chapter Two appears a list of those traits that are typically found in Right-Wing Authoritarians. When reading this list, think GOP leaders Limbaugh, Gingrich, Cheney and Palin.

Right-Wing Authoritarian - Leaders:

* Typically men (Palin is the exception but think masculine phrases used to define her such as "hockey mom", "basketball point guard", and "field dress a moose")
* dominating
* opposes equality
* desirous of personal power
* amoral
* intimidating and bullying
* faintly hedonistic
* vengeful
* pitiless
* exploitive
* manipulative
* dishonest
* cheats to win
* highly prejudiced (racist, sexist, homophobic)
* mean-spirited
* militant
* nationalistic
* tells others what they want to hear
* takes advantage of "suckers"
* specializes in creating false images to sell self
* may or may not be religious
* usually politically and economically conservative/Republican

When reading the below list of follower traits, think of those angry white faces (actually more red than white) at your typical "teabagger" party and recent Town hall "screamer" secession.

Right-Wing Authoritarian - Followers:

* men and woman
* submissive to authority
* aggressive on behalf of authority
* conventional
* highly religious
* moderate to little education
* trust untrustworthy authorities
* prejudiced (particularly against homosexuals, woman, and followers of religions other than their own)
* mean-spirited
* narrow-minded
* intolerant
* bulling
* zealous
* dogmatic
* uncritical toward chosen authority
* hypocritical
* inconsistent and contradictory
* prone to panic easily
* highly self-righteous
* moralistic
* strict disciplinarian
* severely punitive
* demands loyalty and returns it
* little self-awareness
* usually politically and economically conservative/Republican

While reading this list you may have asked yourself why these current followers, who display a deference to authority, are not following the head guy; the President of the United States. The answer is a simple one. The glue that binds the current out of power leaders to their pathetic followers is clearly and unambiguously RACE...

http://www.examiner.com/x-11447-LA-Science-and-Tech-News-Examiner~y2009m8d10-How-the-GOP-got-hijacked-by-RightWing-Authoritarians

For those who have not read John W. Dean's "Conservatives Without Conscience" or Bob Altemeyer's "The Authoritarians," I highly recommend both books in order to better understand Right Wing Authoritarianism. Dr. Altemeyer offers his on line for all of us to read in order to understand and learn to counter them. His advice?

From this link above (referring to the '08 elections, but it holds true for the present, as well):

So what’s to be done right now? The social dominators and high RWAs
presently marshaling their forces for the next election in your county, state and
country, are perfectly entitled to do what they’re doing. They have the right to
organize, they have the right to proselytize, they have the right to select and work for
candidates they like, they have the right to vote, they have the right to make sure folks
who agree with them also vote...

...

You can watch the authoritarians tear democracy apart, bit by bit, bite by bite.
Or you can exercise your rights too, while you still have them, and get just as
concerned, active, and giving to protect yourself and your country. If you, and other
liberals, other moderates, other conservatives with conscience do, then everything can
turn out all right. But we have to get going. If you are the only person you know who
grasps what’s happening, then you’ve got to take leadership, help inform, and organize
others. One person can do so much; you’ve no idea! And two can do so much more.
But time is running out, fast, and nearly everything is at stake.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Ozymanithrax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-14-09 10:42 AM
Response to Original message
1. The GOP was not hijacked, they chose the path...
They chose to use the "S" word (Socialism) because it had negative connotations going back to the 1800s in this country. They chose to polarize their base. But in order to keep the base at home, they needed to deliver a message of fear on a whole new level.

I don't think that most of the elected members of the GOP believes the filth they spew, but they have done it so long that they can not turn their back.

They chose a path of radical extremism, but we will all pay for their choice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Emit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-14-09 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. I am certain Mr. Dean would argue that the GOP was hijacked
John Wesley Dean III (born October 14, 1938) was White House Counsel to U.S. President Richard Nixon from July 1970 until April 1973.

...

Dean is currently an author, columnist, and commentator on contemporary politics, strongly critical of conservatism and the Republican Party, and a registered Independent who supported impeachment of President George W. Bush.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Dean
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ozymanithrax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-14-09 11:26 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. And I would respectfully disagree.
The party is responsibile for their message. Those who call everything socialist are simply repeating an old argument, but they have to up the ante, make it more urgant. I've heard the socialist meme since the days when I read Comic books in the early 60's. It worked in the past, people elected them but never really expected their leadership to actually carry out the crazy threats. Now, they have appealed to violent extremists who would rip the country apart in order to save it. They chose to do that, even if they did not understand the consequences of their actions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Emit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-14-09 11:40 AM
Response to Reply #8
16. I'm not sure it's even necessary to argue the point
Considering how many Republicans in my own family who have left their party, it can be argued on many levels.

The major point of this discussion, however, leads back to right wing authoritarianism and what it means for liberals and progressives in terms of where our country heads.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niceypoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-14-09 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #8
23. The GOP has no agenda
They have no solid beliefs, just some vague notions of ideological purity that they attempt to uphold. This worked fine for them in the days of the, 'Iron Curtain,' with the Soviet Union as the bad guy. Once the Soviet Bloc collapsed, the GOP no longer had a discernible foe, thus they turned their gun sights inward on America, which continues to this day.

They are anti-everything, they are, 'for,' nothing. When the loonies at work start bragging about how smart Limbaugh and his ilk are I ask them, 'What is Rush Limbaugh for, can you name anything?' The answer is always a vacant, befuddled, puzzled look. They don't contemplate anything beyond the depth of a bumpersticker.

They are merely parrots that squawk out canned talking points without digesting them first. As Rush says, 'With me you don't need to think, I do your thinking for you.'

They have become the party of mindless drones. Resistance is futile, you will be assimilated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TxRider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-14-09 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #1
10. Half their base has left and become independents.
But will still swing their way depending on the candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-14-09 11:29 AM
Response to Reply #1
11. That's right. It wasn't hijacked. It was sold in their "free market". nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Juche Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-14-09 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #1
26. According to Altemeyer there are 2 groups in movement conservatism
Edited on Mon Sep-14-09 04:18 PM by Juche
Right wing Authoritarians and social dominators.

I would strongly recommend everyone read Altemeyers (free) ebook, as well as the scientific paper 'political conservatism as motivated social cognition'. People need to know what we are up against.

http://home.cc.umanitoba.ca/~altemey/


http://terpconnect.umd.edu/~hannahk/bulletin.pdf

http://members.shaw.ca/jeanaltemeyer/drbob/chapter5.pdf


As far as the two groups, RWAs tend to be fear driven, dogmatic, submissive, closed minded, aggressive, ill informed, hypocritical. Big surprise, I know.

Social dominators tend to be more like sociopaths. They are cynical, despotic, manipulative, self centered, hypocritical and predatory.

Altemeyer claims that RWAs gather together, then social dominators take advantage of a pool of misinformed, aggressive followers to do their bidding for them. Basically a situation like the pied piper, with a cynical leader and tons of followers.

In contemporary conservatism RWAs tend to be people like Palin, Hannity, Beck. Very simple minded, dogmatic people whose ideas are filled with fear, xenophobia, contradictions, stubborn misinformation and aggression towards outsiders and deviants.

Social dominators are people like Cheney, Rove, Limbaugh, Gingrich, Giuliani and leaders of the business community (who fund right wing think tanks). People who are pretty cynical, power hungry and aware that they are manipulating pepole. Despite the GOP being a party of religious fanatics, Cheney and Rove are supposedly atheists. Despite the GOP supposedly being about family values, Giuliani and Limbaugh have both been married and divorced several times. Gingrich publically condemned Clinton's affair while he had his own affair with a coworker. These are cynical manipulators using a base of violent, ignorant people to service their own ends.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-14-09 08:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
29. True but
Edited on Mon Sep-14-09 08:44 PM by Raine
I think they still thought they (the GOOPers) were in charge and now they've found that the path they choose has gone off the rails and over the cliff and they stuck in taking the suicidal plunge over the cliff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Echo In Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-14-09 10:44 AM
Response to Original message
2. A concerted, multifaceted undertaking since the 70s.
The most insidious aspect of the RW belief system is how many of its central tenets and talking points are free-floating throughout the broader Corporate Culture, yet are not accurately identified and labeled as such, hence many unconsciously adopt these (profits over people) 'values' in their pro-"business sen$e" indoctrination, and will often vehemently oppose criticism of rightward aims since they don't perceive what's in question is actually right-wing - it's just "good" business decisions, or, just "the way it is."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niceypoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-14-09 10:52 AM
Response to Original message
3. You describe sociopaths
Edited on Mon Sep-14-09 11:03 AM by niceypoo
Down to a tee

I work with a republican who always brags that he is unable to feel compassion, as if that is a strong point. I tell him, 'in psychology people who are unable to experience compassion are labeled sociopaths.' This has a bonus effect because he doesn't talk to me for a few weeks afterward.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Emit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-14-09 08:18 PM
Response to Reply #3
28. lol
When I was a counselor with the state, I had a couple of sociopaths and borderline personality disorder clients that were very difficult to deal with.

The RWA personality that Altemeyer describes does remind me of these personalities in many, many ways. And his advice in dealing with them is pretty much what research shows with some personality disorders - in most cases, you are not going to change them. They are a very challenging bunch.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-14-09 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
4. This is important, because we are triangulating towards their position rapidly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Emit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-14-09 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Sucked in like a whirlwind
Wonder if Obama and his staff have read Dean's book or Altemeyer's work? If not, they should.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Echo In Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-14-09 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. Do you honestly believe such people are tapped/hired w/o understanding what's what in this country?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Emit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-14-09 11:32 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. Not sure I follow your question
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Echo In Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-14-09 11:40 AM
Response to Reply #12
15. The questioning of whether or not Obama & staff had read Dean's book re authoritarianism
I'm suggesting that these forces are sooo pervasive/dominant within the corp/state nexus of America that even when corporatist Dems are allowed a "victory," it's always within perimeters established by and acceptable to those RW elements. Which is to say, a candidate who is tapped to play the role of President here of course knows the real score - not the propaganda and fairytales re our illusory system of governance, and wouldn't have to read Dean's Conservatives Without Conscience in order to have a firm grasp of the situation, and their role within it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-14-09 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #15
17. I fear you are correct. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Emit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-14-09 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #15
18. Well, for starters, as a firm believer in 'knowing thy enemy'
imho, i think it would behoove our Democratic leaders to school themselves on the underlying personalities of these pervasive RW elements. I have to run, and I have more to say on the topic, but, in essence, if I understand you correctly, you are saying we have already lost and it matters not whether we attempt to counter RWAs, as they seem to 'run the show' so to speak. But, I am in a hurry, so perhaps when I log back in, I can read more carefully the points you are trying to interject.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Echo In Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-14-09 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #18
19. No...nowhere did I state or imply that people should NOT counter the RW
I'm saying that, at crucial levels, the Dems, what's ostensibly the 'oppositional' (to corporate rule) party is a strategic sham.

"America has one political party with two right wings." ~ Gore Vidal

People of course should counter this...but the real dilemma lie in attempting to encourage people to acknowledge the obvious - w/o that, all 'counter attempts' stem from an illusory position.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Emit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-14-09 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #19
24. Conservatism does not equal Right Wing Authoritarianism as defined by Altemeyer
As I understand Altemeyer's work, the underlying constructs of conservatism, capitalism, or even corporatism, for example, on the whole, are not necessarily Right Wing Authoritarian concepts in and of themselves. There are many conservatives who are not RWAs. Not all Republicans are RWAs.

Right Wing Authoritarianism, as defined by Altemeyer and introduced by Dean, refers to the particular personalities of individuals, and I am not certain it can be applied to whole constructs. Granted, that does not necessarily mean that many, or even the majority, of ruling corporatists - the ones who really rule the show - are not RWAs; it is just that the concept as defined in the OP speaks to individual RWA leaders and their followers.

I understand and appreciate your input, and, my comments above questioning whether you were saying "We've already lost, what does it matter?" speaks directly to understanding exactly what you are saying. Because, in essence, I for one can be easily distracted and become apathetic in knowing what you quoted Gore Vidal as stating, that America has one political party with two right wings. In other words, there are many times when I think to myself, "What does it matter, both parties are the same?"

Nevertheless, the point of the OP speaks to individuals, not to whole constructs. While there may be some truth in the application of RWA to conservative, capitalist, corporatist, etc. constructs, and much evidence to support a strong argument for that application, it is not the subject of Altemeyer's work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Echo In Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-14-09 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #9
13. Self delete - wrong place to re
Edited on Mon Sep-14-09 11:39 AM by Echo In Light
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-14-09 11:01 AM
Response to Original message
6. I think back to Anthropology classes and Ruth Benedict's idea of Cultural Ethos. This is "Machismo"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-14-09 11:38 AM
Response to Original message
14. I second your book recommendations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madeline_con Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-14-09 11:58 AM
Response to Original message
20. You might also read about the Dominionists at Yurica Report
and their systematic takeover of political power in the U. S.

http://www.yuricareport.com/Dominionism/DirectoryRiseOfDominionismInAmerica.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Emit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-14-09 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #20
25. Yes, madeline_con, I have read that and I agree it is a must read
thank you for pointing that out

I also suggest The Rise of the Religious Right in the Republican Party @ http://www.theocracywatch.org/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Echo In Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-14-09 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #20
27. Thanks for posting that
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Emit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-15-09 12:00 AM
Response to Reply #20
31. Speaking of the religious fanatics, have you seen this?
I posted it a while back, but, I cannot believe it didn't get more coverage:

A French Revelation, or The Burning Bush
JAMES A. HAUGHT

Incredibly, President George W. Bush told French President Jacques Chirac in early 2003 that Iraq must be invaded to thwart Gog and Magog, the Bible’s satanic agents of the Apocalypse.

Honest. This isn’t a joke. The president of the United States, in a top-secret phone call to a major European ally, asked for French troops to join American soldiers in attacking Iraq as a mission from God.

Now out of office, Chirac recounts that the American leader appealed to their “common faith” (Christianity) and told him: “Gog and Magog are at work in the Middle East…. The biblical prophecies are being fulfilled…. This confrontation is willed by God, who wants to use this conflict to erase his people’s enemies before a New Age begins.”

This bizarre episode occurred while the White House was assembling its “coalition of the willing” to unleash the Iraq invasion. Chirac says he was boggled by Bush’s call and “wondered how someone could be so superficial and fanatical in their beliefs.”

~snip~
http://www.secularhumanism.org/index.php?section=library&page=haught_29_5



There is a recent article in GQ about Rumsfeld, too, that illustrates some of the religious fanaticism that surrounded the invasion of Iraq: "AND HE SHALL BE JUDGED"

This mixing of Crusades-like messaging with war imagery, which until now has not been revealed, had become routine. On March 31, a U.S. tank roared through the desert beneath a quote from Ephesians: “Therefore put on the full armor of God, so that when the day of evil comes, you may be able to stand your ground, and after you have done everything, to stand.” On April 7, Saddam Hussein struck a dictatorial pose, under this passage from the First Epistle of Peter: “It is God’s will that by doing good you should silence the ignorant talk of foolish men.” (To see these and more Bush-administration intelligence cover sheets, visit GQ.com’s exclusive slideshow).~snip~


http://men.style.com/gq/features/landing?id=content_9217
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-14-09 12:01 PM
Response to Original message
21. The wackos backed up to the GOPs front door with garbage truck full of money?
Greedy assholes always say yes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-14-09 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
22. They weren't hijacked. It's who they really are. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-14-09 08:46 PM
Response to Reply #22
30. It is now
that's all they have left, everyone who thought different has left.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Emit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-17-09 08:43 PM
Response to Original message
32. I'm gonna kick this again
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 01:34 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC