Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

New England Journal Of Medicine: Doctors OVERWHELMINGLY Want Public Option (At Least)!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-14-09 05:36 PM
Original message
New England Journal Of Medicine: Doctors OVERWHELMINGLY Want Public Option (At Least)!
Edited on Mon Sep-14-09 05:37 PM by BlooInBloo
There's no *way* the media can keep this quiet, is there? (Surely Olbermann and Kaddow will be all over it.)

I don't recall for certain - did we have strong physician support like this back in '94 (or whenever it was)?


http://healthcarereform.nejm.org/?p=1790&query=home

Overall, a majority of physicians (62.9%) supported public and private options (see Panel A of graph). Only 27.3% supported offering private options only. Respondents — across all demographic subgroups, specialties, practice locations, and practice types — showed majority support (>57.4%) for the inclusion of a public option (see Table 1). Primary care providers were the most likely to support a public option (65.2%); among the other specialty groups, the “other” physicians — those in fields that generally have less regular direct contact with patients, such as radiology, anesthesiology, and nuclear medicine — were the least likely to support a public option, though 57.4% did so. Physicians in every census region showed majority support for a public option, with percentages in favor ranging from 58.9% in the South to 69.7% in the Northeast. Practice owners were less likely than nonowners to support a public option (59.7% vs. 67.1%, P<0.001), but a majority still supported it. Finally, there was also majority support for a public option among AMA members (62.2%).



...

On one of the most critical elements — expansion of coverage — our study of a national sample of physicians showed that a clear majority support a combined public–private approach to expanding health insurance. We found that physicians’ support for including a public option in the reform package largely mirrors the support revealed in national public polls conducted throughout the spring and summer of this year.1 A similar proportion of physicians also supported the expansion of Medicare to help cover the near-elderly population. Support of public and private options was consistent across a wide range of physicians, including those from the traditionally conservative southern regions of the United States, those with a financial stake in their practice, and members of the AMA — despite that organization’s history of opposition to reform efforts.2 The AMA’s 2009 platform on health care reform originally endorsed an expansion of health insurance through private means.3 But the organization recently came out in support of a House proposal for reform that includes a new public option4 — a position that our data suggest is consistent with the views of its members.



Plenty more in the report - check it out!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-14-09 05:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. Dear Republicon Homelanders: More reality for you to ignore
Edited on Mon Sep-14-09 06:10 PM by SpiralHawk
"Move along. There is nothing to see here."

- Corporate PuppetMasters to Republicon Teabagging* Sheeple Working Against Their Own Interests
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_IfsvLILwMiE/SoDWFqBe3kI/AAAAAAAAAMQ/CHu1CLeof8M/s400/Picture+4.png
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-14-09 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Sucks that this came out today - there's a football game on soon...
So I'll miss the good news shows. Sigh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
subterranean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-14-09 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. They will dismiss this by saying the survey was biased.
They'll claim only liberal doctors were surveyed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bozita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-14-09 05:46 PM
Response to Original message
3. Bigtime K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crunchgarcia Donating Member (73 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-14-09 05:49 PM
Response to Original message
5. AWESOME!
I REALLY hope this gets out... C'mon Keith, report the news!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DevonRex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-14-09 05:50 PM
Response to Original message
6. Great find Bloo!!! This is a good one to send all our nutty RW relatives.
Please don't tell me I'm the only one who has them. Oh. But it's from New England, LOL. They won't read it because it was done by the damn Yankees.

:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Soylent Brice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-14-09 05:54 PM
Response to Original message
7. already been posted by kpete and ProSense
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCKit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-14-09 11:03 PM
Response to Original message
8. "...also majority support for a public option among AMA members (62.2%)."
In case anyone needed proof that the AMA (which has come out against reform, in general) represents corporations and not their own members in this.

How, exactly, does that work?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Apr 20th 2024, 08:05 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC