|
If you do loan it out, remind people of its dangers AND do NOT take any money. No compensation no contract. Thus if anything goes wrong the person harmed can NOT sue under Contract law, but some sort of liability law. Also tell the user to read up on the use of such machine on the net and any where else you can get information. Tell him you are NOT providing any warranty.
Now your home owner's insurance should provide any coverage for any harm do to your act, but be careful.
Also remember, juries tend to hate insurance companies (Thus the big payouts you hear of in the news) but do NOT like punishing a home owner (Thus insurance companies are almost NEVER listed in a complaint, the insured is, even if insurance will pay for the injury). Judges know this, as do lawyers. No insurance (or other source of money) no lawsuit (or once it is found that no insurance exist the case will be dropped). On the other hand home owner's insurance should cover any harm PROVIDED you do not rent out the lift as a business (This do NOT accept any money when he takes it, if upon the return he gives you a tip that is all right BUT make sure you do NOT ask for a tip AND do not demand any payment or tip if none is offered).
Further if you know of any problems in using the lift, make sure you tell the borrower (Best to have a written list of any concerns and do NOT just give him the list read the concerns to him). That way he can NOT claim he did NOT know of the dangers.
I can NOT think of anything else to do. I hate to tell someone NOT to loan a tool out because sometime that is the best way to maximize use of the tool (They tend to go bad if NOT used) but when it comes to any thing more then hand tools you have to warn the user of its dangers. Make sure their know of the dangers. It is considered good training to go over safety concern of any machine every so often in the first place so going over the dangers of the machine will also help you from being harm from misuse of the machine.
One last comment, check your state law. Some states do NOT permit a judgment (If it gets that far) to be used against MARITAL property, while other states do permit it. For example if you are in Pennsylvania and you loan out this tool and somehow the person gets harmed AND a jury determined it was do to some act of your part (Which I can not see if you do the above, but possible) the Jury can entered a Judgment against you. The problem is such a judgment can NOT be used to sell marital property in Pennsylvania (And since Pa is one of two states that prohibits attachment of wages the Judgment would be impossible to enforce unless the house insurance covers such accident and most do).
In the other 48 states if a Judgment is entered against you, the judgment holder can attach wages, but such a debt can be discharged in Bankruptcy (Unless it is the result of INTENTIONAL HARM, you did NOT tell him of a potential defect which you clearly knew of and that defect caused the injury). In the two states the prohibit attachment of wages for such debts, Pennsylvania and Texas, you can still declare bankruptcy. In Bankruptcy you can keep up to $20,000 equity in your home (If you keep up the mortgage payments), $2000 equity in an Automobile and $10,000 in other goods. "Equity" means the difference between what the item is worth and any liens against it. This a house worth $100,000 with a $80,000 mortgage has a $20,000 equity and the owner of such a house can keep the house in Bankruptcy. Please Note I am going over the Federal Exemptions. While Pennsylvania does NOT permit attachment of wages, it exempts only $300 in assets from Execution sale so everyone in Pennsylvania opts for the Federal Exemptions. Other states have more liberal exemptions from execution sale and in the Federal Bankruptcy Code you can opt for the State Exemptions instead (Rarely done in PA given the limited state exemptions compared to the Federal Exemptions).
I mention Bankruptcy for if push comes to shove it is an option. In this case I do NOT see it being needed but I remind people that you can use it once every eight years.
Basically I do NOT see any real downside to lending out the lift, but understand what you are doing and go over the danger of the machine so eliminate any liability if an accident should happen. If an accident should happen, then and only then can you be held liable and your home insurance should cover any such liability. Worse comes to Worse you can avoid the liability through bankruptcy. The later statements are to cover any potential downside. Is suspect any potential downside will be minimal but you have to understand them for their are real.
For more details discuss this with a local lawyer, their know their state law AND what the Judges and Juries will do with that law much better then I can.
|