Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Richmond Times Dispatch: Court clears inmate in one of two 1984 rapes

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Heidi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-19-09 12:43 AM
Original message
Richmond Times Dispatch: Court clears inmate in one of two 1984 rapes
Published: September 19, 2009

The Supreme Court of Virginia has exonerated an inmate on one of his two rape convictions after DNA evidence tied another man to the crime.

It is the first time the court has granted a "writ of actual innocence" based on biological evidence.

The writ was issued for Thomas E. Haynesworth, who was convicted in 1984 of raping a woman in Richmond.

But Haynesworth won't be leaving prison anytime soon. He was sentenced to 64 years in prison on another rape and related crimes in Henrico County.

<snip>

Further analysis identified another suspect, Leon Davis, the so-called "Black Ninja" who is serving seven life terms for a series of sex attacks in Richmond and Henrico.

In addition to the Richmond rape for which he has been cleared, Haynesworth is being held for convictions that include a Jan. 30, 1984, rape in Henrico.

Although Haynesworth believes Davis was responsible for that attack, too, it appears no biological evidence remains for testing. Haynesworth, 44, and Davis, 45, share the same blood type, once knew each other and lived in the same East End neighborhood at the start of 1984.

Read more
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
imdjh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-19-09 12:54 AM
Response to Original message
1. Normally, I'd point out that DNA cannot prove innocence, but if the court went to the unusual step..
... of declaring him innocent, and given that he has served 25 years, unless the second crime was murder and there is considerable reason for a court to think that the verdict is beyond question, then I'd be OK with letting this guy out. Sixty-four year sentence on a rape though, makes me think that either the rape was especially awful, or the sentence is suspiciously severe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-19-09 12:55 AM
Response to Original message
2. Slow night?
:evilfrown:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Heidi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-19-09 12:59 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. What do you mean?
Please explain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Apr 20th 2024, 01:44 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC