Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Defeated: Kyl’s Amendment to Let Insurers Frighten Medicare Enrollees

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-24-09 07:22 AM
Original message
Defeated: Kyl’s Amendment to Let Insurers Frighten Medicare Enrollees
Defeated: Kyl’s Amendment to Let Insurers Frighten Medicare Enrollees
By: Scarecrow Wednesday September 23, 2009 1:30 pm


One of the Medicare "savings" contained in the health reform bills would reduce or eliminate the subsidies Medicare pays to private insurers who administer Medicare benefits through Medicare Advantage plans. They're generally paid an extra 12 to 14 percent to do that.

Insurers who receive these subsidies are protesting the proposed cuts and warning their Medicare enrollees that the cuts would lead to reductions in Medicare benefits. Humana, for example, sent an alert to its enrollees, warning them of likely benefit cuts and urging them to contact Congress to let them know their feelings about the reductions in their benefits.

The Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services, CMS, immediately directed Humana and all other Medicare Advantage insurers, to cease sending these scare messages to their enrollees, and the insurers are howling -- to their favorite Senators. So the Republican talking point of the week has become that health reform will reduce Medicare benefits, and they repeated that all day long.

In today's Senate Finance Hearing on the Baucus health reform bill, the CMS warning sparked an amendment from Senator Kyl to guarantee that insurers could tell their enrollees anything they wanted with respect to pending legislation, all in the name of protecting the insurers' right to free speech.

The Committee debated the amendment for about an hour and finally voted on strict party lines to defeat the Kyl amendment.

more...

http://seminal.firedoglake.com/diary/8414
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
hobbit709 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-24-09 07:42 AM
Response to Original message
1. Yep. The old when you throw a brick at a pack of dogs.
The one that yelps the loudest, etc. They make it so obvious as to who owns them.
Whoever it was that that said Congress should wear suits with their sponsors decals on them like NASCAR drivers was right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 06:15 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC