Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Forget congressional banking reforms. President announcing Global reforms

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Ruby the Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-25-09 04:19 PM
Original message
Forget congressional banking reforms. President announcing Global reforms
Wow!

Good stuff!

Live on MSNBC right now...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-25-09 04:20 PM
Response to Original message
1. Is "announcing" the same as "enacting"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ruby the Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-25-09 05:03 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Of course not
What dropped my jaw was the policy points that were announced as "agreed to globally". Executive pay tied to long term results was a huge one.

The only way to reign in multi-nationals (and their multi-national shareholders) is via a mutually agreed-to multi-national set of regulations.

I think it is exciting as I have been concerned as to whether Congress has the collective cojones to reign them in nationally.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-25-09 04:26 PM
Response to Original message
2. Words are cheap. We cannot win without substantive action.
Just like the health care debate. We're interested in the details of the final bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enid602 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-25-09 04:37 PM
Response to Original message
3. regulations
Geithner said (prior to the reform legislation being submitted to Congress) that such reform would only be enacted if other industrialized countries adopted the same regulations. This was a thinly-veiled threat to the Brits, who maketed London as a place to avoid Oxley-Sarbannes legislation which passed after the Enron fiasco.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ruby the Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-25-09 05:27 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. I was not aware of this. Thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-25-09 04:51 PM
Response to Original message
4. How about we forget about the global reforms and concentrate on our own mess?
Why don't we try something enforcable to start with and let the rest of the world worry about itself for a while?.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ruby the Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-25-09 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Can you seperate Wall Street out from the global economy?
These damn crooks will just pull a Haliburton and move their HQ to Dubai or somewhere and keep on raping and pillaging.

Besides -- we can't even get Congress to stand up to Big Insurance and Big Pharma. You think they are going to stand up to the banks?

I don't recall Glass-Steagall being reinstated and Gramm-Lehey being repealed. It has been a damn YEAR since TARP. Where is the regulation from our own reps?

*crickets*

This has to be done globally or it won't be done at all, IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kaleko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-25-09 06:17 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. Exactly right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-25-09 04:53 PM
Response to Original message
5. International Law and Regulations are worthless without full commitment .
I would much rather Obama focus on National Banking reforms. That way at least something would get done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turbineguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-25-09 05:23 PM
Response to Original message
8. This is of course
the correct approach.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ruby the Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-25-09 06:10 PM
Response to Original message
10. Video up now:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
timtom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-25-09 06:18 PM
Response to Original message
12. NWO
Any questions?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ruby the Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-25-09 06:59 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Yep, I gots one.
Edited on Fri Sep-25-09 07:04 PM by Ruby the Liberal
What is it about the massive FAIL in attempting to regulate multi-national corporations nationally that you are missing?

Please explain to the class how you suggest we crack down on the immoral/illegal casino without making it a global mandate...

Edit for spelling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
timtom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-25-09 07:08 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. So, you REALLY think this is all being done for the good of
humankind, do you?

I feel better about global economics already. Thanks, Ruby.

(I'm just a little uncomfortable with the video of real live jackbooted thugs in Pittsburgh, working hand-in-glove with the military, in clear defiance of the Posse Comitatus Act of 1878.)

An attempt to curb immoral/illegal corporate activities, says you.

NWO says I.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ruby the Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-25-09 07:20 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Look, I want to see Tibet free as well,
but this has nothing to do with the anarchists in Pittsburgh. That city was simply unprepared for an event of this magnitude. Lessons from Seattle and Paris were ignored. I have family there. They didn't prepare correctly, or underestimated the effect on the city.

I just feel strongly that we will not be able to kill all of the cockroaches unless we take a holistic approach. No more hiding funds overseas to escape random regulation (and taxation) while taking taxpayers to the cleaners to keep the scam going.

I appreciate your concerns. Trust me on that. Those who sacrifice freedom for safety deserve neither.

I just don't see another equitable way around this when we have multi-nationals with multi-national ownership (shareholders).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 04:56 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC