Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Dems "jarred" by drop in fundraising? Not really-false alarm from WaPo, again

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-25-09 06:32 PM
Original message
Dems "jarred" by drop in fundraising? Not really-false alarm from WaPo, again
http://mediamatters.org/blog/200909250023

The WashPost's dubious fundraising report

September 25, 2009 2:55 pm ET by Eric Boehlert


This A1 article is getting lots of attention, and fits in nicely with the Beltway's preferred Dems-are-in-big-trouble narrative:

Democrats Are Jarred by Drop In Fundraising


That's the headline. Should we count the problems with Paul Kane's article?

First, there's not one Democrat quoted in the Post piece who is "jarred" by the drop in fundraising, or anything like it. The Post simply makes that announcement itself. In fact, some Democrats quoted seem to suggest it was inevitable that a fall-off would occur given the historic amount of money the party raised during Obama's run. i.e. Don't fundraising tallies, even for committees that oversee Congressional races, often drop after presidential election year cycles, which now last two years long, including the primary season?

Yet Kane spends almost his entire article comparing fundraising tallies collected immediately after a presidential compaign, with tallies collected during one. Pretty obvious apples and oranges, no?

Then there's this graphic the Post used to show just how supposedly jarring the drop-off has been for Democrats.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Jane Austin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-25-09 06:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. I don't know about you, but I was already giving to
Obama's campaign in the summer of 2007.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-25-09 06:43 PM
Response to Original message
2.  I don't know. I know that I and many of my friends have stopped contributing.
I will only give my support to individual candidates.And many of us have written our reasons on the back of the empty envelpes we returned to party offices.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-25-09 07:09 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. This is about a current article that claims Dems are 'jarred' when
they are not. No, it's not about you or your friends. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-25-09 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. All My friends are happy with the President who we have supported
since the Primary with our time and money. And, we will continue with both.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-25-09 07:14 PM
Response to Original message
4. I read this in USA Today and they spin is the same-it is a GOP *WIN*
as opposed to the expected drop in funding for the Dems and the money FLOODING in to the GOP from the business boys trying to stop Obama
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-25-09 07:21 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. That damn librul media strikes again! It's so consistent, it's aggravating. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-25-09 07:21 PM
Response to Original message
7. I saw that OP in LBN yesterday and didn't click on..I knew
it was a big fearmongering headline(I know the corporatemediaWhores too well)..and I knew it would be hopping with disingenuous whiners saying they weren't donating anymore until President Obama did exactly as they wished.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-25-09 07:35 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Thank You! I knew I saw that, but checked GD and GD/P and
couldn't find it. I put this at the tail end of the LBN article, in case anyone else cares to consider being deceived. :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-25-09 07:43 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. I think the two desparate articles
dovetail nicely. :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 17th 2024, 07:09 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC