|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Are_grits_groceries (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-02-09 09:33 AM Original message |
W.H. didn’t make calls backing public option |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joeycola (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-02-09 09:36 AM Response to Original message |
1. so, the WH is leaving Congress to get the blame for any health bill. That |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chimpymustgo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-02-09 09:39 AM Response to Reply #1 |
4. That is NOT leadership. That is NOT affecting CHANGE we can believe in. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joeycola (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-02-09 09:46 AM Response to Reply #4 |
5. Bingo |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Echo In Light (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-02-09 09:57 AM Response to Reply #4 |
9. That is a phony opposition-to-corporate-rule party within a phony Rep Democracy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SammyWinstonJack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-02-09 10:20 AM Response to Reply #4 |
19. Bullshit from the start. Duped and bullshitted all for bi-partisanSHIT. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
debbierlus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-02-09 09:07 PM Response to Reply #19 |
47. C'mon. It is rather obvious when he is talking about bipartisanship with criminals |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
closeupready (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-02-09 09:38 AM Response to Original message |
2. Underscoring perceptions that a staffer failed to tell him he won the election, and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
QC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-02-09 09:38 AM Response to Original message |
3. If he fights for something, he might lose. Better to float above it all |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vidar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-02-09 09:56 AM Response to Reply #3 |
8. Sums it up very nicely. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
QC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-02-09 09:59 AM Response to Reply #8 |
11. Thanks, but it's frustrating to see how risk-averse he is. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vidar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-02-09 10:45 AM Response to Reply #11 |
25. I agree. He's intelligent, eloquent & charismatic; but he's the diplomat when a fighter is needed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SemiCharmedQuark (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-02-09 10:47 AM Response to Reply #11 |
26. I absolutely 100% agree with this assessment. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-02-09 09:50 AM Response to Original message |
6. And this sort of shit is why I'm criticizing Obama on his |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nashville_brook (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-02-09 10:25 AM Response to Reply #6 |
22. i'm with you on this one, Cali -- very disappointing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rudy23 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-02-09 09:55 AM Response to Original message |
7. To me, Obama has been completely transparent on this, judging by Rahm's actions |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AllentownJake (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-02-09 10:00 AM Response to Reply #7 |
12. I got an IM saying you posted something very harsh about President Obama |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Autumn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-02-09 11:22 AM Response to Reply #12 |
28. LOL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AllentownJake (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-02-09 11:52 AM Response to Reply #28 |
30. It was pretty hilarious |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rudy23 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-02-09 11:45 AM Response to Reply #12 |
29. But when I suggest there's a blindly loyal Pro-Obama army on here, I'm a nutball |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MNDemNY (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-02-09 12:29 PM Response to Reply #29 |
35. No, he's "playing chess". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Frank Booth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-02-09 09:00 PM Response to Reply #29 |
45. That army is quickly diminishing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
unkachuck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-02-09 09:23 PM Response to Reply #45 |
48. he's not even.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ddeclue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-02-09 12:27 PM Response to Reply #12 |
33. and?? so??? who cares? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
maglatinavi (614 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-02-09 07:28 PM Response to Reply #7 |
42. rudy 23 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AllentownJake (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-02-09 09:58 AM Response to Original message |
10. Change we can Believe in |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CrispyQ (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-02-09 10:10 AM Response to Reply #10 |
14. Indeed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wroberts189 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-02-09 10:11 AM Response to Reply #10 |
15. Call it as you see it, but the fat lady has not sung yet. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
closeupready (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-02-09 10:19 AM Response to Reply #15 |
18. Oh, right. He's playing chess. For those of you still pushing that meme, watch |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wroberts189 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-02-09 11:01 AM Response to Reply #18 |
27. Not Chess... Poker. ... wait for the fat lady.. the song will be good. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-02-09 10:02 AM Response to Original message |
13. Maybe cause it'd be better if that half-assed crap DIED in committee? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KittyWampus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-02-09 10:31 AM Response to Reply #13 |
24. shhh! The usual Reactionary Screamers on DU are too busy pretending to be so fucking smart |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Frank Booth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-02-09 09:05 PM Response to Reply #13 |
46. Please see this thread: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Historic NY (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-02-09 10:15 AM Response to Original message |
16. So tell me again why did Obama even bring it up to reform healthcare. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chimpymustgo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-02-09 10:17 AM Response to Reply #16 |
17. And then request that the bill come out of the right-wing FINANCE committee. Recipe for failure. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tim01 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-02-09 10:24 AM Response to Original message |
20. I honestly wish they would scrap the idea at this point. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kansas Wyatt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-02-09 10:25 AM Response to Original message |
21. He's playing multidimensional chess, huh? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
QC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-02-09 07:49 PM Response to Reply #21 |
43. Our very own Spock! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KittyWampus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-02-09 10:28 AM Response to Original message |
23. Why would he bother wasting his time? It was a foregone conclusion what pile of crap would come out |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
librechik (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-02-09 12:13 PM Response to Reply #23 |
32. Because he cares about us citizens and our needs? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grantcart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-02-09 11:55 AM Response to Original message |
31. If it is scripted all the way through conference committee why would you make a phone call |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cliffordu (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-02-09 12:29 PM Response to Reply #31 |
34. Lotta hate in this thread. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-02-09 01:02 PM Response to Reply #34 |
39. As Lord Helmut so eloquently stated about a simliar thread.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cliffordu (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-02-09 01:04 PM Response to Reply #39 |
40. Yep, yep..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gateley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-02-09 12:36 PM Response to Original message |
36. Go ahead and laugh, but I think they have a plan to just get anything through |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chimpymustgo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-02-09 12:53 PM Response to Reply #36 |
37. Kinda like Jesus... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gateley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-02-09 12:56 PM Response to Reply #37 |
38. Nope -- Jesus has never proven anything to me. Obama has. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-02-09 01:09 PM Response to Reply #36 |
41. I'm not laughing but then I've |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Captain Hilts (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-02-09 08:41 PM Response to Original message |
44. Sad. They've got their govt.-sponsored healthcare already. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Faryn Balyncd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-02-09 09:35 PM Response to Original message |
49. Why in hell is Obama NOW calling ROCKEFELLER to pressure him to support Baucus's corporate welfare? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Mon May 06th 2024, 09:01 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC