For those who enjoy legal entertainment: Orly Taitz v. Judge Land

Her latest filing. :rofl:

Apparently, she suspects him of ex parte discussions with AG Holder, collusion with President Obama based on stock holdings of Microsoft and Comcast and yes, uses the term "batshit crazy".

Enjoy!

http://ia311029.us.archive.org/1/items/gov.uscourts.gamd.77605/gov.uscourts.gamd.77605.24.0.pdf

Please please please.

They're all confined to a very small property in Libya, where they are forced to Keraoke until they actually decide to accept a brave rescue from Gaddafi, accompanied by Hugo Chavez.

himself from a moot case, in which the plaintiff has stopped action and fired the attorney, after which the attorney sought to be and was removed as counsel -- all in response to the judge's order that counsel show cause why she ought not be sanctioned for filing a frivolous suit, and all begging the judge to pile contempt penalties atop Rule 11 sanctions

Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq. (SBN 223433)
Attorney for the Plaintiffs
29839 S. Margarita Pkwy
Rancho Santa Margarita CA
ph. 949-683-5411
fax 949-766-7603
Telephone (949) 683-5411
E-Mail: dr_taitz@yahoo.com

Holder's stock holdings somehow influenced Judge Land because of "defacto" President Obama's personal relationship with Bill Gates. Or something like that -- it's hard to follow the stream of consciousness and random connections that litigious freak show is spewing here.

I can't wait to read Judge Land's response. My guess is he's love to pass this case on to someone else rather than deal with her. Of course she spins this as someone else is out to get her -- it's the paranoia thing. She needs to go back on her meds.

What a fucking idiot. Jesus.

and I POSITIVE she's NEITHER...

That was hilarious.

She's a fucking riot!

Her filings are hilarious!!

Accusing the judge of things you cannot prove is always a great idea.

Responding to "explain why I should not fine you $10,000" with "I demand you recuse yourself" for the {following made up stuff} is classic shit.

Judges give sanctions all the time. They have specific authority to hear such matters. He issued a show cause order, which put her on notice to appear and answer for her conduct. It's possible she could have behaved herself in response, come in with some kind of rational approach, and he would give her a lecture and hit her with $500, not $10,000. But Noooooooooooo! She had to file a Motion to Recuse, accusing him of things that are truly nothing but speculation.

I've been saying she'd be disbarred by mid 2010, and she's making me look good.

When I practiced, I did pro bono work as a probation monitor for the CalBar. The petn against Orly is really, really ugly. I think she is going down hard.

I don't want her to go down too terribly soon. While I appreciate the cost of wasting the court's (and taxpayer's) time, the entertainment value is immeasurable.

...it is an anonymous petition to have her disbarred and not just a CalBar complaint ~~ the small form that can be filed by a client or anyone. What is pending is a very ugly petition to yank her bar card.

I think this is a working link to the petition to disbar her:

http://www.scribd.com/doc/15546236/Taitz-State-Bar-Complaint

Just reading through the first few pages is enough. Wow. I had no idea - I have only been paying attention for the last few months when I first heard of her.

It is, IMO, extremely well done.

that was written sufficiently clearly that a legal education is not needed to grasp the import of it. Ms. Taitz has been very busy -- a shame no challenge to the legitimacy of Bu**sh**'s "election" ever saw as much court time.

I've been shaking my head at her all year. Most people do not realize how bizarre her conduct is for an attorney. She lacks the knowledge one gains from having been in court before. It's obvious she has no idea what she's doing.

Bizarre is a very apt description of her conduct. One usually does not see this unless there is some mega problem with the lawyer in addition to no experience. I cannot imagine showing such disrespect. Her conduct is just so un-lawyer like.

throw herself on the mercy of the court, that the Judge's order was a final chance of sorts.

I am amused that this was her response. :D

Who files a legal brief with "batshit crazy" in the text? LOL!

I am grateful to you legal-types who can dig through this stuff for the best nuggets. :D

No group is enjoying this more than the legal profession. Judges, lawyers, paralegals, etc. They all love the craziness she provides.

You keep thinking she's really someone like Sasha Baron Cohen in drag, and he's going to suddenly unveil and have a good laugh on all of us.

...I emailed a link to this thread to all my legal pals. It is like watching a train wreck. Since Steve Yagman and Manny Real, I have not really seen anything this entertaining in feddie court!

~~ who most likely is gonna make minced meat out of her for accusing him of judicial misconduct with NO facts whatsoever to support the allegation.

Do not fuck with a feddie judge....do not fuck with a feddie judge...

And it is almost without significant oversight. 99.9% of what they do will not be appealed, and most of what they have appealed will be sustained on appeal.

...I cannot imagine fucking with someone on the federal bench. Orly is out of her mind to even consider doing the shit she is doing.

Just wait.... she'll say it's the Obama thugs or brown shirts that control Judge Land and MADE him lock her up to avoid having the TRUTH come out.

...with Orly, that is not that far fetched! :hi:

who owns Microsoft stock and works for Obama who is a friend of Bill Gates so therefore Judge Land is prejudiced against Orly. And he said some mean things about her and because he mentioned the birthers and some people think the birthers are bat shit crazy, Judge Land is prejudiced against her and thinks she's bat shit crazy because he called the birthers by the pejorative term birthers that implies that the birthers are bat shit crazy. And he dismissed Captain Rhodes petition almost immediately without calling for evidence even though it wasn't a hearing for discovery or evidence and Orly had asked for an expedited decision which really means she wanted to show evidence but didn't want the defense to show evidence or respond to her evidence. The real truth is that Captain Rhodes wanted to serve her country in her role as an Army Captain and medical doctor but wanted to be sure her orders were legitimately from the legitimate Commander in Chief not the defacto Commander in Chief Barack Hussein Obama who is not a natural born citizen because the only birth certificate he has ever shown is a photoshop from the State of Hawaii. But none of this matters because Judge Land is out to get Orly because Eric Holder told him to and in fact, has told all of the judges in the United States to dismiss all of her motions and cases because Obama and his brown shirted thugs told Holder to get to all of the judges so that Orly would never have a chance to present evidence that Obama was born in Kenya.

She is buzzing around that judge's head like a buzy little fly... just landing on his desk... staring at him and looking for a place to bite him... and he is drawing up and aiming right for her a fly swatter about the size of Panama and she aint seeing a damn thing coming!

:evilgrin:

I think they get really, really angry when people do that. I think they write the names somewhere in indelible ink. They also can wait forever.
Martha Stewart and Marion Jones found out. Roger Clemens is going to very soon IMHO.

If Judge Land is like some of the judges I know, Taitz is in for one hell of shitstorm. Judges do not find anything funny about her antics.

According to the certificate of service, Orly hasn't gotten her pro hac vice petition approved yet. She isn't supposed to be filing things in court until that little procedural hurdle is cleared. Where is her local Georgia counsel in all this?

At any rate, if this is her pleading to show the court why she shouldn't be fined $10,000, it's highly inadequate. I hope she brings her checkbook next time she appears in court, or has arranged for someone to drive her car back to an office or someplace, because she's probably going to be spending some time as a guest of the federal marshals.

Not an attorney -- I found this funny and was looking forward to those of you who do understand the intricacies to educate people like me and point out even more amusing facts. Thanks for the comments -- it makes this all the funnier.

...and it is only to appear as counsel of record for that particular case ~~ not permanent admission to practice in that jurisdiction.

All throughout this, I wondered if various judges weren't allowing the 'birfer' case to be heard just so that we could just move past it.

...but there may be some procedure that allows one to file while the petition is pending. I never had to do that in feddie court...a pro hac vice ...so I am not sure.

I was reading on the registrar of actions on a major case the other day looking for a pleading I wanted to get copied, and there was some filing from an out of jurisdiction atty seeking permission to do something while her pro hac vice petn was pending. Now, of course, I cannot recall what the hell case I was looking at!

I've been trying to work the term "batshit crazy" into briefs for years, but it never seems quite appropriate.

I guess if you actually are batshit crazy, you lack that compunction.

Heh.

Think of it as a stimulus ticket for our comedy writers and stand-up comics. :)

Don't forget to read her affidavit at the end, either. Yes, that's right, she signs her own affidavit that she's acting in good faith and such and has the gall to attach it as an exhibit like it's actual evidence. Like putting "affidavit" on the top of a page MAGICALLY makes that which is written on such page any less BS. Such exhibit almost contained more :rofl: than the pleading before it. But not quite.

I read the filing AND the bar complaint against her in its entirety. Well worth the time spent :evilgrin:

Protip for those just now acquainting themselves with Oily Taint: Read the bar complaint linked upthread, in full. There are some true gems in there. My personal favorite was Oily Taint trying to pass off Dred Scott as valid law.

Edit to add link to the post that linked to CalBar complaint: http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x6686293#6686617

LOL!

Edit -- you only need 3 more to remove this from the GP, but you can't undo teh crazee. :hi:

I seldom rec as I mostly lurk, but this was some good shit. :hi:

...especially when they come in waves. :D

Thanks for the rec. This is one crazy biotch!

Edit for careless spelling error

have ... or ... will likely have evidentiary support ..."

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure > III. PLEADINGS AND MOTIONS > Rule 11
http://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcp/Rule11.htm

She believes her contentions and that's enough, at least in Orly World.

It is bound to be 'one of a kind', rofl. I just love her 'six degrees of Kevin Bacon' argument re Holder, gotta give her points for creativity even if it's a batshit crazy kind of creativity!

Thanks for posting this, it is a delicious read.

Recommended while :rofl: