Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Democrats Ponder Health-Care Suicide

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-04-09 02:18 PM
Original message
Democrats Ponder Health-Care Suicide
http://www.commondreams.org/view/2009/10/04-4

<snip>
If Democrats enact something like the health-care bill emerging from the Senate Finance Committee, they may call it a legislative victory and it may keep the campaign donations flowing from the insurance industry, but the Democrats would surely infuriate millions of American voters.

Indeed, it seems like some Democrats, such as Sens. Max Baucus and Kent Conrad, have lost themselves so much in the inside-Washington reeds of legislating a convoluted compromise acceptable to the insurers, that they are inviting an angry backlash from average Americans.

The danger for Democrats is that this industry-friendly legislation would impose new burdens on citizens, including government fines for failing to sign up for a health-insurance plan, without guarantees that the coverage won't be almost as crappy and expensive as it is now. The bill rejects a public option that would put competitive pressure on private insurers.

Plus, key elements of the bill, like the so-called shopping "exchanges," aren't to take effect until 2013, meaning that Americans will have watched this messy process unfold for months and then be told that the current system, which has cruelly pushed millions of sick people into bankruptcy, will get four more years to bankrupt more Americans.

By contrast, Medicare, the single-payer health system for senior citizens, was signed into law on July 30, 1965, and took effect on July 1, 1966, less than a year later.

...more
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Sebastian Doyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-04-09 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
1. The Baucus disaster must die in committee
and his political career must die in his next primary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BzaDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-05-09 06:04 AM
Response to Reply #1
20. Will never happen. Bank on it. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-04-09 02:24 PM
Response to Original message
2. They enact this legislation and the mask will be off
They will no longer be the party of FDR.

The DLC will have succeeded in one thing and that is in totally destroying the Democratic Party.

This might be the action that leads to an independent movement or the death of both political parties.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hydra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-04-09 02:29 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. The mask was off months ago
But a disturbing number of people are still hoping for something different.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-04-09 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Well said...
FDR: You got that right
ER: It's so sad...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-04-09 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. If there is an afterlife
and those in it can see what is going on, the man must be in the need of a major sedative.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
inna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-04-09 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. it's not by "accident" that this monstrosity of a reform does not kick in

until 2013.

i'm absolutely dismayed and i've never been so disappointed by the political process as i am now.

:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-04-09 02:36 PM
Response to Original message
4. We MUST keep up the pressure on these Senators
Because it doesn't matter how much money the insurance industry gives these clowns for their reelections, it won't buy one single vote of anyone that's pissed off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Davis_X_Machina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-04-09 02:46 PM
Response to Original message
6. After passing in 2006 a must-purchase mandate, and fines...
Edited on Sun Oct-04-09 02:47 PM by Davis_X_Machina
...for non-compliance, without even offering a public option, the Democrats lost control of the Massachusetts state legislature for the first time in a generation. After all the protests clogged the jails.

Oops.

That didn't happen -- in fact, this week there was a Boston Globe poll showing 2-1 support for the Massachusetts plan, with only 11% of respondents voicing support for repeal.

And the State House losses? Still 10-1 Dem in the lower House, 7-1 in the Senate. With a Democratic governor.

Let me know when the riots start.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-05-09 06:23 AM
Response to Reply #6
22. People who aren't sick are happy in MA
Fuck the sick people--who cares about them? They're a minority.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-04-09 02:48 PM
Response to Original message
7. I've not heard one Democrat (other than Baucus) come out in support of the Baucus
bill. As such I have no idea why people fear it becoming THE Democratic bill?

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-04-09 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. Because the media treats it as such.
I too don't understand why it's the only bill talked about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-04-09 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #7
16. Agreed -- Baucus Junk is going to get thrown out pretty much. Media and some DU'ers
act as if Baucus is the final bill. I doubt anything from Baucus makes it into the final bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BzaDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-05-09 06:07 AM
Response to Reply #16
21. I can't wait to see your posts after you are so spectacularly proven wrong.
Edited on Mon Oct-05-09 06:20 AM by BzaDem
There are many provisions in the Baucus bill that I'm sure I don't like any more than you. But it is clear that that is the direction the merging of the bills is going. It may very well be amended on the floor (and then again in Congress), but it will very likely start out with many components of the Baucus bill. I doubt I will be able to convince you until the bill hits the floor, but at that point there won't be any need for more debate over it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-05-09 07:59 AM
Response to Reply #21
24. call your Senators and Reps rather than "pre-gloating" over my "spectacular wrongness"
Reid, Baucus ready to split on public option as vote nears
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=103x486538
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-04-09 04:02 PM
Response to Original message
9. the blue dogs need to be neutered
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-04-09 04:13 PM
Response to Original message
11. If they do, they are getting
virtual knee pads from me for Christmas for giving the insurance companies a fabulous blow job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
inna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-04-09 04:17 PM
Response to Original message
13. one of the readers' comments from the link in the OP....
It's hard to fully absorb the enormity of what has taken place. Only 11 months ago today, the Democrats were in a position where they could have marginalized the Republican Party as a force in US politics, for decades to come. Today, they are on the verge of party suicide, having accomplished the near-impossible feat of bringing the utterly-discredited Republicans back from the grave.

The net result of the Obama administration will be to have breathed the Republicans back to life, while impoverishing most Americans & continuing most of Bush Jr's policies. At the end of the Obama era, the USA will still be ruled by the same 2-party system that has ruled since the Civil War -- a fantastic triumph for the plutocracy, & an unmitigated disaster for everyone else.

The function of the Dem Party has nothing to do with "serving the public." Its mission, rather, is stabilizing the political system -- providing the illusion of "choice" while offering no real choice, & ensuring continuity of corporate rule. // This is the ONLY possible outcome in a system that forces voters to choose between 2 big-business parties. The "magic ingredient" is the gullibility of voters who believe Democrats are "The Lesser Evil."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-04-09 04:19 PM
Response to Original message
14. With people like Baucus, Conrad & Lieberman on your side
The concept of "60" is just so ridiculous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-04-09 05:50 PM
Response to Original message
15. THERE ARE 5 BILLS OUT THERE. BAUCUS IS THE ONLY ONE THAT IS SO CRAPPY
Baucus is not going to get "ENACTED"

All of that shit is going to get thrown out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-04-09 05:52 PM
Response to Original message
17. I suppose people claiming to be on our side talk like the Baucus bill is the only one...
because they want things to look as bad as they can possibly make them look.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-05-09 05:05 AM
Response to Reply #17
19. No, because we know who is calling the shots in Congress..
Big pharma, big insurance and big medicine with their huge campaign donations.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
njk83 Donating Member (2 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-05-09 05:00 AM
Response to Original message
18. No public option + mandate = corporate welfare
Edited on Mon Oct-05-09 05:01 AM by njk83
It seems less likely that we will get a public option as time goes by. Why even have reform? It'll just inject more money into a pool of private insurers to get more people covered, but it won't do anything to lower costs.

Combine that with a mandate and you see how potentially dangerous this is for Democrats, and the country as a whole. People will be forced to pay for something they cannot afford, and will for the first time put actual legitimacy into the GOP's "change you can't afford" message.

I'd rather see reform not pass if there's no public option. Without it we are just giving the insurance companies even more power and making the system worse for the individual.

This is a potentially huge clusterfuck for the Democratic Party and our government as a whole. Mark my words, if this passes with a mandate but no real public option the Democrats will lose BIG in 2012, and the Republicans will come back to deregulate and undo any small bit of actual progress Dems will have made from 2009-2013. Furthermore millions of people will be forced into bankruptcy by what is essentially a corporate mandate. Disgusting that this is even being discussed.

I will lose nearly all faith in the political process if it goes down this way. I hope that it doesn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gravel Democrat Donating Member (598 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-05-09 06:52 AM
Response to Original message
23. It didn't start out like this...


]br]


Fool me once, shame on you

fool me twice? I don't think so







tax speculation

end the war
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 05:14 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC