Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama should re-hire Van Jones

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Trocadero Donating Member (892 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-04-09 02:42 PM
Original message
Obama should re-hire Van Jones
He should say, I was wrong not to support him. He is a good man. I need him. America needs him. I am the President. End of story.

And then watch Beck shit is pants in apoplexy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Don Caballero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-04-09 02:50 PM
Response to Original message
1. I totally agree
I just wish he did not sign that conspiracy petition. I believe this is what brought down this true progressive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dimenzio Donating Member (1 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-04-09 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. Certainly
If he decided to re-hire Van Jones, it would certainly make the republicans happy. ^^
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-04-09 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. Anybody refusing to sign a "conspiracy petition" is not suited to serve in government.
It has been proven that important evidence relevant to the greatest mass murder in this country's history has been purposely withheld from "investigators."

That's what's known as a mass murder conspiracy, be the cover-up after the fact or otherwise.

Think for yourself. Stop letting the people in government control your brain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-04-09 04:36 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Obama should hire David Icke then. He has been fighting the reptillians way longer than Van Jones
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-04-09 04:45 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Your post makes no sense.
I can't even imagine what went through your head unless you're just displaying some kind of nonsense you've been programmed to respond with.

I'd be interested in hearing from you again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HipChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-04-09 04:50 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. Haha! good one!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-04-09 04:52 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Totally
I can't stop laughing. It's just so funny.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-04-09 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #1
13. I agree
Even if Van Jones was right to agree with 9/11 transparency/accountability he should have refused to sign the petition. Even if the 9/11 Commission failed to conduct a proper investigation we should pretend they did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rmp yellow Donating Member (136 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-04-09 03:20 PM
Response to Original message
2. Obama is too pragmatic to commit that kind of political suicide
The backlash would be too strong. I think a less controversial man or woman on that job would be more advisable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laconicsax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-04-09 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. To what end?
Do you think that the RW noise machine would be up in arms about Obama campaigning to bring the Olympics to the US if the various controversies were based in reality. Everything he does winds up being part of a manufactured controversy.

There has to be a point where this makes the controversial choice is no less advisable than the less controversial choice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donheld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-04-09 03:21 PM
Response to Original message
3. Yes he should
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-04-09 03:22 PM
Response to Original message
4. I think he should hire Ron Paul instead.
Although I don't think he would like working for a black man.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laconicsax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-04-09 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Why should Obama hire an anti-Government racist?
People who want to dismantle the Government shouldn't be put in positions within the Government. The * years are a fantastic testament to that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Don Caballero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-04-09 03:47 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. Ron Paul is a vile human
An open racist whose stated and open goal is to divide the country. Why is he even allowed to serve in our government?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-04-09 04:15 PM
Response to Original message
10. I wouldn't stop lolling for days.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-04-09 04:55 PM
Response to Original message
16. I thought Van Jones
Edited on Sun Oct-04-09 04:56 PM by noise
was being prosecuted for signing a 9/11 petition.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Trocadero Donating Member (892 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-04-09 05:25 PM
Response to Original message
17. Twitter @whitehouse
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC