Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NYT: Buyout Firms Profited as a Company’s Debt Soared (recommended reading after MM's Capitalism)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
JHB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-05-09 07:19 AM
Original message
NYT: Buyout Firms Profited as a Company’s Debt Soared (recommended reading after MM's Capitalism)
New York Times Page 1 story on the Simmons Matress company (think "Beautyrest"), it's bankruptcy, and the money extracted from it by private equity firms trading it and loading it up with debt.

If Michael Mooore's Capitalism: A Love Story has you up in arms, or if you think it was too emotional and skimped on facts, this is an article (and others like it) you need to read.

What this article recounts happening to Simmons has happened to thousands of companies since the 80's, and this sort of flipping and remote control managment has been one of the prime engines in gutting our manufacturing base. It continues to destroy companies today: take a company with consistent if mediocre profits, load it up with debt, sell assets and break the workers to make it "more efficient" (all the while extracting big salaries and fees), then flip it to somebody else for a big profit, until the last sucker has nothing but a brand name.


http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/05/business/economy/05simmons.html?_r=1&hp

Simmons says it will soon file for bankruptcy protection, as part of an agreement by its current owners to sell the company — the seventh time it has been sold in a little more than two decades — all after being owned for short periods by a parade of different investment groups, known as private equity firms, which try to buy undervalued companies, mostly with borrowed money.

For many of the company’s investors, the sale will be a disaster. Its bondholders alone stand to lose more than $575 million. The company’s downfall has also devastated employees like Noble Rogers, who worked for 22 years at Simmons, most of that time at a factory outside Atlanta. He is one of 1,000 employees — more than one-quarter of the work force — laid off last year.

But Thomas H. Lee Partners of Boston has not only escaped unscathed, it has made a profit. The investment firm, which bought Simmons in 2003, has pocketed around $77 million in profit, even as the company’s fortunes have declined. THL collected hundreds of millions of dollars from the company in the form of special dividends. It also paid itself millions more in fees, first for buying the company, then for helping run it. Last year, the firm even gave itself a small raise.

Wall Street investment banks also cashed in. They collected millions for helping to arrange the takeovers and for selling the bonds that made those deals possible. All told, the various private equity owners have made around $750 million in profits from Simmons over the years.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-05-09 07:21 AM
Response to Original message
1. Wall Street is destroying the nation
Pure and simple. There will be no future for this country as long as these people continue to operate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
charlie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-05-09 07:35 AM
Response to Original message
2. Remember Goodfellas?
"Partner" with a business and use its line of credit to order all the high-dollar merchandise you can get away with. As deliveries come in the front, smuggle it out the back. Once its bled dry and buckling under ruinous debt, torch it to cover your tracks (and maybe collect a nice insurance dividend).

And if the owner, your "partner", complains?

FUCK YOU. PAY ME.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Altoid_Cyclist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-05-09 08:51 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. There's only one thing that seperates Wall Street and "organized crime".
"Organized Crime" is probably more honest in the way that they conduct business.

Wall Street has too many talking heads on TV covering up their misdeeds to ever be completely exposed for the criminal enterprise that it has become.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomClash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-05-09 07:39 AM
Response to Original message
3. Another Form of Disaster Capitalism nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-05-09 09:02 AM
Response to Original message
5. Recommended.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JHB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-05-09 10:51 AM
Response to Original message
6. .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brentspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-05-09 04:52 PM
Response to Original message
7. This is the true face of capitalism as beloved by libertarian capitalist zealots
Edited on Mon Oct-05-09 05:06 PM by brentspeak
Their idea of "capitalism" has absolutely nothing to do with old-fashioned enterprise or entrepreneurship or simply owning a business in general; it has everything to do with obtaining and squeezing maximum profit using whatever means necessary and regardless who or how many get crushed as a result - just the way the uber-capitalists like it. And there was no government interference involved whatsoever in the Simmons story, no way to pin the blame on "government regulation." The people who ideally deserved to have lost their shirts walked away with millions; everyone else was destroyed.

Markets don't "regulate themselves". The wrong people got unjustly rewarded, while the right people got unjustly annihilated. Milton Friedman proven spectacularly wrong yet again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JHB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-05-09 06:30 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Spot on. Actual entreprenuers see a company with an established product and market, whereas...
...these swindlers ("corporate raider" was an apt term) just see a pool of money that isn't in their pocket yet. They see no value except what they can siphon off.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 04:35 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC