|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
rudy23 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-05-09 02:18 PM Original message |
Poll question: Which version of the public option would you like to see in the final bill? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GreenPartyVoter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-05-09 02:19 PM Response to Original message |
1. Oh, well as long as the words "Public Option" are used, it's good enough for me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mikelgb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-05-09 02:19 PM Response to Original message |
2. Single Payer Universal Option |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zywiec (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-05-09 02:21 PM Response to Original message |
3. The free option. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Overseas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-05-09 02:25 PM Response to Original message |
4. Open up Medicare in 2010 to all who want it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tridim (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-05-09 02:29 PM Response to Original message |
5. Unrec'ed for the obvious and lame snark. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rudy23 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-05-09 02:32 PM Response to Reply #5 |
6. Unrec'd----why exactly? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tridim (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-05-09 02:50 PM Response to Reply #6 |
7. Because snarky pessimism is counterproductive. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rudy23 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-05-09 03:01 PM Response to Reply #7 |
8. So is redefining the public option. Aren't most progressives AGAINST Dems redefining the PO? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
scheming daemons (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-05-09 03:14 PM Response to Reply #8 |
9. I'm sure you will be "redefining" it in a negative light when it comes out |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rudy23 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-05-09 03:38 PM Response to Reply #9 |
11. Why would I redefine the public optiion---I'm not obligated to serve lobbyists and lie to the public |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
damntexdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-05-09 03:22 PM Response to Original message |
10. Not just a strong, robust public option, but one available to all. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rudy23 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-05-09 03:39 PM Response to Reply #10 |
12. According to schaeming daemons, you'd be the one redefining the public option. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sebastian Doyle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-05-09 03:40 PM Response to Original message |
13. A strong robust untriggered public option available to anyone |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue_In_AK (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-05-09 03:52 PM Response to Original message |
14. Single payer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kenny blankenship (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-05-09 03:57 PM Response to Original message |
15. A public "public option" that is optional and public |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bvar22 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-05-09 04:46 PM Response to Original message |
16. A strong Public Option......, unfortunately... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stinky The Clown (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-06-09 12:03 PM Response to Original message |
17. I want the public option that KILLS the insurance industry |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Wed May 08th 2024, 09:52 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC