Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

House Democrats looking at windfall profits tax on insurance industry

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-08-09 05:15 PM
Original message
House Democrats looking at windfall profits tax on insurance industry

House Democrats looking at windfall profits tax on insurance industry
By Jared Allen - 10/08/09 10:59 AM ET


House Democrats are floating the idea of a windfall-profits tax on the private health insurance industry as a way to finance their healthcare overhaul, and to drum up support among members of a divided caucus.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) called the windfall profits tax idea "very preliminary," saying she's asked House Ways and Means Chairman Charles Rangel (D-N.Y.) to look at how much the tax could raise.

I have asked Chairman Rangel to see what is in it for us," Pelosi said. "There's more that the insurance companies could contribute to this health care reform. They're going to get 50 million new consumers, many of them subsidized by the taxpayer. They can put more on the table."

The idea was brought up in a leadership meeting on Wednesday night and brought before the entire caucus on Thursday morning, according to Rep. Gerry Connolly (D-Va.).

Connolly said no specific structure or tax rates were discussed, nor was it estimated how much revenue could be brought in through a tax on the profits of the largest health insurance companies, but Connolly said the idea had wide support.

“I sense that would be a very popular thing to do in our caucus,” Connolly said.

Connolly did not say who was responsible for pushing the tax, but the profits of the largest private health insurers have been under close scrutiny by two high-ranking Democrats who don’t see eye to eye on the other major portions of the House health reform bill: Energy and Commerce Chairman Henry Waxman (D-Calif.) and Rep. Bart Stupak (D-Mich.), who chairs the Oversight and Investigations subcommittee on Waxman’s panel.

more...

http://thehill.com/homenews/house/62211-house-dems-considering-windfall-profits-tax-on-insurance-industry
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MNDemNY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-08-09 05:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. 75% or more, please.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-09-09 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. apparently they will then pass it on to us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-08-09 05:17 PM
Response to Original message
2. 99.99999%
That way their priorities are re-adjusted
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Fields Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-08-09 05:18 PM
Response to Original message
3. wonderful idea. let's get it done!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yodoobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-08-09 05:21 PM
Response to Original message
4. Tax profits at 90%. Use the revenue to fund healthcare
simple.
elegant
effective

Win/Win for everyone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-08-09 09:59 PM
Response to Original message
5. How about diverting campaign contributions from the Health Insurance Indusrty..
...to fund the Public Option?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yoyossarian Donating Member (821 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-08-09 10:16 PM
Response to Original message
6. K & R! You're always on top of things, babysis!
(more from the same story)

Waxman, a strong supporter of a “robust” public option, and Stupak, whose insistence on prohibiting any publicly funded healthcare plans from covering abortions has put him at odds with House leaders and complicated efforts to complete work on three House bills, have requested volumes of documents from the nation’s largest private insurers regarding their profits and the compensation paid to top executives.


I looked this guy up on Wiki:

He is currently one of several strongly pro-life Democrats in the House (others include Tim Holden, James Oberstar, Dan Boren, Gene Taylor, and Jim Marshall); his 2004 congressional campaign was endorsed by the National Right to Life Committee.

Stupak is a member of the House Energy and Commerce Committee, his only committee assignment. He serves on the Telecommunications & the Internet; Commerce, Trade & Consumer Protection; Environment and Hazardous Materials subcommittees; and as the Chairman of the Oversight and Investigation subcomittee.

(snip)

While in Washington, DC, Stupak rents a room for below market rent at the C Street facility of The Family, a Christian organization which operates the property as a tax-exempt church and a residence for several congressmen and senators.

When asked if he takes part in "fellowship" activities at the Family's C Street Center, Stupak said that he just rents a room, but does not know what goes on there. Stupak refuses to "discuss what goes on there, because I'm not there. ... Are there other activities going on there? Yes. But what goes on and things like that, I don't know. I have my room there." Pressed again about whether he's "involved" in any "activities" at the house, Stupak responded, "I have a room there. And I participate in a Tuesday night dinner once in a while there. ... So there is no regimen. There is no group stuff I have to do. ... You guys ... are grasping at straws that's not there. I rent a room there." "I do not belong to any such group. I don't know what you are talking about. ... I have no affiliation," he adds.


He calls himself a Democrat--but with his apparent religious-fundamentalist mindset, it's hard for me to trust his true intentions... for our intentions here, though, I'll just hope he's as avaricious as he is seeming-stupid; whatever it takes to get the job DONE.

God, sometimes I get so sick of politicians; Reeps OR Dems, they've sold our souls out from under us--and not even for a reasonable rate; they get half a million in contributions, then turn around and reward their sponsors with BILLIONS of dollars... it's like they're trading our futures for glass beads or magic beans or something, cuz they just don't "get" the math at those levels...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yoyossarian Donating Member (821 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-09-09 10:19 PM
Response to Original message
8. Kick!
This is just too good to sink like a stone!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 03:25 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC