Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Coburn introduces amendment to prevent study of political science; m$m does that

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-08-09 07:46 PM
Original message
Coburn introduces amendment to prevent study of political science; m$m does that
GAK!

http://crookedtimber.org/2009/10/07/tom-coburn-doesnt-like-political-science/

Tom Coburn Doesn’t Like Political Science

by Henry on October 7, 2009


He has just introduced an amendment to prevent the NSF from funding political science research (PDF). Apparently, Fox News and CNN pundits can do our job better than we can.

The largest award over the last 10 years under the political science program has been $5.4 million for the University of Michigan for the “American National Election Studies” grant. The grant is to “inform explanations of election outcomes.” The University of Michigan may have some interesting theories about recent elections, but Americans who have an interest in electoral politics can turn to CNN, FOX News, MSNBC, the print media, and a seemingly endless number of political commentators on the internet who pour over this data and provide a myriad of viewpoints to answer the same questions.


Whether the answers provided by this ‘myriad of viewpoints’ are good ones, I will leave as an open question. I obviously have a dog in this fight as a political scientist who will probably apply for NSF funding in the future. But I also think that there are measurable Good Things (in terms of understanding how our system of politics works etc) that come from good empirical work in political science. And the politics of Coburn’s amendment are not precisely difficult to discern (among his stated objections are that this money has gone to fund research concluding that the US is increasingly willing to torture suspected terrorists, and carefully unspecified work – doubtless some form of shameless subsidized leftwing punditry – by Paul Krugman). If you feel that political science doesn’t deserve any funding, feel free to say so in comments. If you disagree with Coburn (and are a political scientist) and live in the US, get on to your senator’s office to say so (and ideally, contact your university’s research vice president’s office or whatever while you are at it – they are likely to have good contacts). This may come up for a vote today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Cant trust em Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-08-09 07:47 PM
Response to Original message
1. Who needs data when then can just have baseless opinions? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-08-09 08:19 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Mind-blowing. He advocates listening to the talking heads for
political science, and that's all it takes? Oi.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bleacher Creature Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-08-09 07:55 PM
Response to Original message
2. Today's not a good day to be a sane person from Oklahoma. NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ezgoingrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-08-09 07:59 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. It's never a good day to be a sane person from Oklahoma.
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
provis99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-08-09 10:34 PM
Response to Original message
5. as a political scientist,
Coburn is now my least favorite Congresscritter. Ever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-08-09 10:38 PM
Response to Original message
6. He's basically trying to institutionalize ignorance by cutting funding to political science programs
Gotta keep the peasants away from those goddamn movable type printing presses, lest they learn how to read and then rebel against the landed gentry! We cannot have that! Everybody has a fucking place in society, and unless they are of the monied aristocracy, then they belong at the fucking bottom with the garbage! :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-09-09 06:54 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. Exactly. He wants to keep people 'down on the farm' and dumb 'em
down. Very sad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ardent15 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-08-09 10:39 PM
Response to Original message
7. Fuck you, Coburn.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Okie4Obama Donating Member (188 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-08-09 10:41 PM
Response to Original message
8. Please, Coburn, make us look MORE like backward rednecks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmowreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-09-09 07:03 AM
Response to Original message
10. I know how to make Coburn happy
Move government political science research funding from NSF to the National Endowment for the Humanities, at the same funding level it receives now.

The National Endowment for the Humanities can then tell Tom Coburn that you "pore" over electoral politics, but the money going to fund the Iraq war or any of a million other pet Repuke priorities is "pour"ed down the drain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 10:23 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC