Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why is the Nobel Peace Prize awarded?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-09-09 01:07 PM
Original message
Why is the Nobel Peace Prize awarded?
I think a good portion of the complaining about this award might have been avoided if people would have taken a few seconds to learn why the award is given.


From The Nobel Peace Prize: From Peace Negotiations to Human Rights
by Francis Sejersted
Chairman of the Norwegian Nobel Committee, 1991-1999
Read the entire article

1.Where the Peace Prize is concerned, the wording has been seen as opening up opportunities to engage in processes which have not yet reached a conclusion, but where there has been clear evidence of progress...

2.The Prize, in other words, is not only for past achievement, although that is the most important criterion. The committee also takes the possible positive effects of its choices into account. Among the reasons for adding this as a criterion is the obvious point that Nobel wanted the Prize to have political effects. Awarding a Peace Prize is, to put it bluntly, a political act – which is also the reason why the choices so often stir up controversy.

3.The mention in the will of the "abolition or reduction of standing armies, and the holding and promotion of peace congresses" reflects the period in which the will was written. The approach today is to see it as pointing to general disarmament and the dissemination of the concept of peace. The most important provision, however, is contained in the term "fraternity between nations." This general and open provision has provided a basis for the wide definition of peace-related work which the committee has applied right from the start.

4.The selection of individual prize-winners is never easy, but the focus on particular cases does make it possible to take into consideration the whole range of relevant factors, whether of a universalist or culturally related kind, and to strike a balance. The Laureate will symbolise good will and purity of heart all over the world, but the choice must also win sympathy in his or her own cultural environment. It is the committee's experience that it is possible to find worthy candidates who represent universal ideals of human rights in the most varied cultures.

5.Laureates must be more than skilled diplomats; it is important for them also to be able to stand out as symbols of good will. Only then can the Peace Prize contribute, in the words of Laureate Elie Wiesel, "to turning history into a moral endeavour."



Of course, there are some who would complain and use this award as an excuse to bash Obama whether or not they understood the reasons for the award, so...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-09-09 01:08 PM
Response to Original message
1. Thank you
:hug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JeffR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-09-09 01:09 PM
Response to Original message
2. I'm pretty sure it's awarded to piss off a bunch of DUers
:think:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Posteritatis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-09-09 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Created in the 1890s by time travellers from the year 2009 in the most epic troll ever...
... The sad thing is that isn't the most infeasible thing I've heard lately. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JeffR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-09-09 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. !
Time trolls!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC_SKP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-09-09 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #2
27. LOL! And it WORKS!!!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RetroLounge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-09-09 01:09 PM
Response to Original message
3. How is anyone bashing Obama?
He didn't nominate himself.
He didn't ask for it.
And he accepted it with a perfect amount of humility.

He just hasn't eared it YET.

RL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulsby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-09-09 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. based on the committees ADMISSIONs
he did qualify for it.

i quote their citation: “for his extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and cooperation between peoples"

he has certainly made extraordinary EFFORTS. the fact that THUS FAR they haven't accomplished much , which is understandable considering the degree of fuckupitness he inherited and that politics takes time, isn't a criticism of obama. but some think that means he shouldn't get the award.

if one recognizes that the award is admittedly given for EFFORTS not necessarily ACCOMPLISHMENTS, then by that metric - obama qualifies imo

\
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johonny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-09-09 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #7
18. I agree
You can say you wouldn't have voted for him had you the choice, but it's hard to say he didn't earn it. It's not like the science prizes, based on the criteria he pretty much earned it. There's a reason they separate this prize out from the other ones.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulsby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-10-09 11:27 PM
Response to Reply #18
31. exactly.
heck, they seperate it by nations iirc. norway gives the nobel peace price and sweden gives the scientific stuff...

iirc

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WonderGrunion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-09-09 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #3
20. His work towards global nuclear disarmament
Starting with Obama-Lugar back in 2007 was enough to earn it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-09-09 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
4. Maybe it will encourage him to stop escalating the Afghan conflict
Then it would be definitely well placed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Journeyman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-09-09 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
8. I thought that Prize lost all luster decades ago. . .
When the award was given to Henry Kissinger in '73, as he orchestrated the bombing of Cambodia and plotted to overthrow Chile's democratic government (among other crimes), the Committee showed itself to be clueless and its prize a hollow bauble.

Congratulations to President Obama for winning the award. I just don't find the award itself all that prestigious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-09-09 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. People resigned from that committee over Kissinger's nomination.
It's in extremely poor taste (and demonstrates a considerable amount of ignorance, IMO) to bang that drum. But do feel free to continue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Journeyman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-09-09 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Yes, yes -- history, facts, knowledge -- terribly poor taste to remember . . .
showing my ignorance by exhibiting my understanding. . .

I'll work harder to believe as others do. It won't give succor to my beliefs but it seems very important to you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-09-09 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. How does one give succor to beliefs? WTF?
As for history, facts, and knowledge... yes, people on the the committee that decided on that award resigned in shame. I suppose you think mentioning it now makes some meaningful point. What would that be, exactly?

Seems to me that your only goal is to say whatever you have to to rain on the parade (a goal shared by many on this site, for whatever bizarre reason). Just like the Repukes, Freepers, Islamic extremists, etc.

Well done, really. Be proud.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackRiddler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-09-09 01:55 PM
Response to Original message
12. Because it's a way for a committee of the Norwegian Parliament to influence the global agenda?
Because let's face it, noble as the intentions may be, the weight accorded to the decision of five nice members of the Stortinget is out of proportion. The prize is at its best when it provides a PR boost to groups who could actually use it, like the Ban Landmines campaign, or Ebadi's fight for women's rights in Iran. When the committee aspires instead to editorialize on ongoing world politics in a realpolitik fashion, not so much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-09-09 02:08 PM
Response to Original message
13. This should be pinned at the top of GD
:kick:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-09-09 02:36 PM
Response to Original message
14. A redqueen quote from another thread:
"The award isn't for past achievement... it's for promoting peace, disarmament and fraternity between nations... people seem to want to focus on their dissatisfaction with Iraq & Afghanistan policy and just ignore the blatantly obvious effect he's had on international relations."

:kick:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-09-09 02:41 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Thanks, Swamp Rat.
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-09-09 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Just stopping to read a bit more and think before posting might prevent further misunderstandings.
I am somewhat disappointed by a few of my friends here, who have called or insinuated that those of us celebrating are warmongers, etc. :(



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johonny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-09-09 02:51 PM
Response to Original message
17. agreed
I also think it's the committee's suggestion as to what they'd like to see from the future out of Obama. Obama pretty much knows what Europe thinks of escalating the war in Afghanistan, if he didn't already. It's odd Obama's message has played so loudly in Europe and yet so softly in the US.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kind of Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-09-09 02:55 PM
Response to Original message
19. Hey! This OP seems oddly familiar.
:rofl: Happy to recommend. :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-09-09 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. LOL!
Yeah, I thought yours wasn't getting enough attention... thought maybe a different subject line might help. Also, I like to emphasize things. :7

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kind of Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-09-09 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. That's is so cool, Redqueen. I like the way you think!
:hi: :hug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CrownPrinceBandar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-09-09 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
21. Thanks for this, RQ.............
I think points 2 and 3 are the most important aspects of his award. I see his being awarded as a declaration of what the world expects from Obama, rather than a love-fest for what he's done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BumRushDaShow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-09-09 03:18 PM
Response to Original message
24. K&R
:kick: for the voice of reason.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-09-09 04:25 PM
Response to Original message
25. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beaverhausen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-09-09 04:35 PM
Response to Original message
26. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC_SKP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-09-09 04:36 PM
Response to Original message
28. "Fraternity Between Nations..."
Hear, Hear!!!

:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SidneyCarton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-09-09 04:53 PM
Response to Original message
29. k&r for rational thought.
Edited on Fri Oct-09-09 04:53 PM by SidneyCarton
Reason is a value oft invoked on this board, but all too rarely encountered. Thanks RQ.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-09-09 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
30. Obama put a stop to Bush's drunken medium range missile penis waving...
... and started talking to other nations as a reasonable, honest, and straightforward adult. The Norwegians recognized and acknowledged that.

Obama deserves the Nobel Peace Prize for this alone and the USA shares this honor because we chose not to let a bunch of adolescent posturing dicks, schoolyard bullies, draft dodgers, cowards, thieves, venal bible thumping perverts, reckless drivers, vapid beauty queens, and incurious incoherent puppets lead our nation any longer, by casting off our historical racism to elect a man of exceptional character and great intelligence.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC_SKP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-10-09 11:43 PM
Response to Original message
32. kick nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 09:02 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC