Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

UCLA: Broken Laws, Unprotected Workers

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Nikki Stone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-10-09 05:29 PM
Original message
UCLA: Broken Laws, Unprotected Workers
Edited on Sat Oct-10-09 05:32 PM by Nikki Stone1
http://www.unprotectedworkers.org/index.php/broken_laws/index


At the start of the 21st century, America's workplace laws are failing to protect our country's workers. In industries ranging from construction and food manufacturing to restaurants, janitorial services and home health care, workers are enduring minimum wage and overtime violations, hazardous working conditions, discrimination, and retaliation for speaking up or trying to organize. They have little recourse because of their need for work, especially during the recession. Until now, however, advocates and policy makers lacked representative and reliable data on the magnitude of the problem, the workers who are most affected, and the industries that are the biggest culprits.

Broken Laws, Unprotected Workers is the first study of its kind, exposing systematic and routine violations of employment and labor laws in core sectors of the economy. In 2008, we conducted a landmark survey of 4,387 workers in low-wage industries in the three largest U.S. cities-Chicago, Los Angeles, and New York City. We used an innovative, rigorous methodology that allowed us to reach vulnerable workers who are often missed in standard surveys, such as unauthorized immigrants and those paid in cash. Our goal was to obtain accurate and statistically representative estimates of the prevalence of workplace violations.

The study found that:

* Workplace violations are severe and widespread in the low-wage labor market. In our sample, 26% of low-wage workers were paid less than the minimum wage in the week prior to the survey, and 76% of those who worked more than 40 hours were not paid the legally required overtime rate.
* Job and employer characteristics are key to understanding workplace violations. For example, the industry and occupation of a worker's job was one of the strongest predictors of violations.
* All workers - regardless of legal status, race, gender and nativity - are at risk of workplace violations, though some groups are more vulnerable than others.
* More than two-thirds of our sample experienced at least one pay-related violation in the previous work week. Assuming a full-time, full-year work schedule, we estimate that workers lose an average of $2,634 annually due to workplace violations, out of total earnings of $17,616.



I have downloaded this study and it's horrifying.

From the report:


Minimum wage violations:

Fully 26 percent of workers in our sample were paid less than the legally required minimum wage in the previous work week.* These minimum wage violations were not trivial in magnitude: 60 percent of workers were underpaid by more than $1 per hour.

Overtime violations:

Over a quarter of our respondents worked more than 40 hours during the previous week. Of those, 76 percent were not paid the legally required overtime rate by their employers.

Like minimum wage violations, overtime violations were of substantial magnitude. The average worker with a violation had put in 11 hours of overtime—hours that were either underpaid or not paid at all.

“Off-the-clock” violations:

Nearly a quarter of the workers in our sample came in early and/or stayed late after their shift during the previous work week. Of these workers, 70 percent did not receive any pay at all for the work they performed outside of their regular shift.

Meal break violations:

The large majority of our respondents (86 percent) worked enough consecutive hours to be legally entitled to at least one meal break during the previous week. Of these workers, more than two-thirds (69 percent) received no break at all, had their break shortened, were interrupted by their employer, or worked during the break—all of which constitute a violation of meal break law.


Pay stub violations and illegal deductions:

In California, Illinois and New York, workers are required to receive documentation of their earnings and deductions, regardless of whether they are paid in cash or by check. However, 57 percent of workers in our sample did not receive this mandatory documentation in the previous work week.

Employers are generally not permitted to take deductions from a worker’s pay for damage or loss, work-related tools or materials or transportation. But 41 percent of respondents who reported deductions from their pay in the previous work week were subjected to these types of illegal deductions.

Tipped job violations:

Of the tipped workers in our sample, 30 percent were not paid the tipped worker minimum wage (which in Illinois and New York is lower than the regular state minimum wage). In addition, 12 percent of tipped workers experienced tip stealing by their employer or supervisor, which is illegal.

Illegal employer retaliation:

We found that when workers complained about their working conditions or tried to organize a union, employers often responded by retaliating against them. Just as important, many workers never made complaints in the first place, often because they feared retaliation by their employer. One in five workers in our sample reported that they had made a complaint to their employer....


There are many, many more.

At risk: Women and the foreign-born workers. Even college education did not protect workers from abuse.

This report is a MUST read if you want to see the true state of labor in the US and it can be downloaded free.


TWIX VOY thread on retail being hell goes right along with this report.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=389&topic_id=6687745&mesg_id=6687745
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-10-09 05:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yikes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikki Stone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-10-09 05:33 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Pretty unbelievable.
:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-10-09 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Note there's lots of other good & interesting labor info on the main UCLA labor research website...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikki Stone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-10-09 06:38 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. +1
And thanks for putting the link on this thread. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-10-09 05:41 PM
Response to Original message
4. Republican pooh-poohing begins in 3 . . . 2 . . . 1
You can hear their minimizations now. "This is based on old data. It's bad for business to pay workers. More tax cuts."

That is, if the popular media deign to notice this at all. Hard to get overpaid blow-dried millionaires to give a rat's ass about the help.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Igel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-10-09 09:49 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. I did what I usually do.
Look at the first page of the summary to see what kinds of conclusions the data are taken to support and then skip down to the way the data was collected, processed, and analyzed, what the assumptions were.

If I don't know what to make of that, I tend to realize that I won't know what to make of the rest of the report so I don't waste my time reading it--however outrage provoking or self-righteous-making it would be.

I'm not sure what I think about how they went about getting their sample. It guarantees that the sample will be tainted, since those who have been interviewed will then recruit people to be interviewed. Then they try to adjust the data to account for differences between those who are key members of large social networks and those who aren't. But does the adjustment get rid of biases? What kind of biases does the sampling method introduce? Dunno. I really don't; I have to think about it for a while, sort through what drawbacks I can come up with. But all the data is self-reported, with no hint that they looked at pay records and time clock cards, and that's also not confidence inducing.

This is at the border of politics and research. It's a place I'm not very comfortable at. (There are those that do very similar kind of research, but their politics are neither here nor there--it's when the researchers are advocates that it gets difficult. You don't want to say they're biased, even though given the same kind of conditions for a researcher doing drug research the charges of bias flow freely.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izquierdista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-10-09 05:47 PM
Response to Original message
5. I'll bet they didn't have to go far
You could find all those violations within a 15 walk from the UCLA campus, a lot of them without even having to leave campus. That was one thing that struck me about my time there -- it was set in the wealthiest part of Los Angeles, and every day all the bus lines disgorged hundreds of lower income people on campus and in the neighborhoods around it, each hoping that they could earn just a little bit of that money to see them through.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-10-09 05:51 PM
Response to Original message
6. K&R!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Trillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-10-09 06:38 PM
Response to Original message
8. This makes me so bleeping MAD,
I can't possibly post what I really FEEL.

:kick: & Recommend

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-10-09 06:52 PM
Response to Original message
9. Despite all of this, a whole lot of people even here are violently Anti-Union.
:grr:

It makes me sick when I see Anti-Union Bullshit here. We hear all the exaggerations about how evil and corrupt unions are, and we see total ignorance about all the benefits all of us and our entire nation have gained from strong unions in the past 100 years.

We need to revitalize unions. We need to rebuild unions as a major power for workers and democracy. unions are the only significant way for people in lower income brackets to gain a loud voice with employers, corporations, and politicians. Isn't that exactly what we all know is needed?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-10-09 07:26 PM
Response to Original message
10. Many people I know refuse to believe it when I tell them Wal-Mart does this shit.
I know for a fact that the Americans With Disabilities Act, for example, is violated every day. I have great trouble finding a full-time job because of my Asperger's Syndrome. IMO this is partly because of the "Is a good team player" management fetish and partly because us "Aspies" by nature don;t give a damn about sucking up to the boss's ego.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikki Stone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-10-09 07:29 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. You should talk to Twix Voy, who took us through a stroll at the hell that is Target
This is one reason I put this study up. I wanted to back Twix Voy because I thought that thread on retail hell was spot on, but I needed to find the proof.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
juno jones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-10-09 10:45 PM
Response to Original message
13. K&R! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 12:26 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC