Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama quietly deploying 13,000 more US troops to Afghanistan

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
jeffbr Donating Member (377 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-13-09 09:41 AM
Original message
Obama quietly deploying 13,000 more US troops to Afghanistan
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/oct/13/obama-afghanistan-troop-deployment

Obama quitely deploying 13,000 more US troops to Afghanistan
Move is separate from Nato commander General Stanley McChrystal's request to increase troop levels
Ewen MacAskill in Washington

President Barack Obama is quietly deploying an extra 13,000 troops to Afghanistan, an unannounced move that is separate from a request by the US commander in the country for even more reinforcements.

The extra 13,000 is part of a gradual shift in priority since Obama became president away from Iraq to Afghanistan.

The White House and the Pentagon both announced earlier this year that the number of US troops in Afghanistan was to be raised by 21,000, bringing the total at present to 62,000, with the aim of 68,000 by the end of the year.

But the Washington Post, based on conversations with Pentagon officials, said that on top of those an extra 13,000 "enablers" are also being deployed. They are mainly engineers, medical staff, intelligence officers and military police. About 3,000 of them are specialists in explosives, being sent to try to combat the growing fatality rate from roadside bombs.

The deployment of such non-combat troops is in line with the professed aim of the new US commander, General Stanley McChrystal, to try to win the hearts and minds of the Afghanistan population...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bridgit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-13-09 09:42 AM
Response to Original message
1. A very dangerous world
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niyad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-13-09 09:44 AM
Response to Original message
2. winning the hearts and minds of people whose country we have been destroying for eight years.
how are military police and intelligence personnel supposed to win hearts and minds?

just think of all the good that could have been done in this country, winning hearts and minds, if we had spent the trillion or so on assistance, instead of blowing their country up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thunder rising Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-13-09 09:45 AM
Response to Original message
3. This wasn't even considered news when Bu$h did it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-13-09 09:46 AM
Response to Original message
4. Anything that helps those currently deployed to stay safer and perform
their jobs better, anything that helps our relations with the locals, anything that helps limit casualties, is welcome. I have no problem with this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeycola Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-13-09 10:23 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. If the Adm. would have been open about it would not have cause
this to be news.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-13-09 09:47 AM
Response to Original message
5. in exchange for the 13K or so who are rotating OUT.. net gain= 0
this was reported last night on Rachel Maddow's show ( I think it was her show..might have been Countdown)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beachmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-13-09 09:48 AM
Response to Original message
6. They're support troops, not combat troops. The first time I read this
headline, I thought it was news. Then I read the story. Kind of annoying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeycola Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-13-09 10:24 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. What is beyond annoying is that the Adm did not even
include these extra 13T in its inital announcement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-13-09 09:51 AM
Response to Original message
7. Digging the hole deeper. Followed by digging more graves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SIMPLYB1980 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-13-09 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
10. Not so quiet considering we are talking about it.
God the stupid it burns.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 12:36 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC