Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Princeton to add gender neutral campus housing option next year

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
ccharles000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-14-09 04:45 PM
Original message
Princeton to add gender neutral campus housing option next year
I've never legit gotten to break a story before, but I just found out that some news I've known for 24 hours is now public: Princeton will have a gender-neutral housing option starting in this spring's housing lottery for the 2010-11 school year.

The proposal, authored by student members of the Undergraduate Life Committee, with the help of yours truly, was approved by the ULC two weeks ago and then got a necessary second endorsement from the Council of Masters (of the six residential colleges) yesterday. It's a pilot program which designates Spelman Hall, an apartment-style housing option for upperclass students (in which, significantly, every student gets their own bedroom), as gender-neutral. Instead of having to draw in groups of four students of the same gender, there will be no gender requirement on groups entering the Spelman draw. The ULC, the USG, the Housing office, and anyone else with a stake in the issue will be watching pretty closely to see how this plays out next year. Depending on interest, they may choose to expand gender-neutral housing to other upperclass dorms, or to keep it restricted to Spelman.

This is a big step forward for Princeton, which, until the ULC undertook this proposal, was the only university among the Ivy League and a set of other R1 universities that had never actively considered a gender-neutral housing proposal. While this pilot program may go on to affect relatively few people next year—particularly since it's only an option for students eligible for the Spelman draw anyway—it's a major change in university policy that brings Princeton quite dramatically and unequivocally into the 21st century. I can't help gloating that it puts us ahead of Yale (which withdrew its pilot program last year to considerable undergraduate ire), and the fact that it happened with relatively little fanfare speaks very, very well for this university and its administration.

http://www.campusprogress.org/page/community/post/emilyrutherford/C2nQ
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
JonQ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-14-09 04:49 PM
Response to Original message
1. Well that's it
now that they're living together what's to stop college kids from having sex?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MNDemNY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-14-09 04:53 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Their mother's voices?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JonQ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-14-09 04:55 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. If they're hearing their mothers voices
mid-intercourse either because they called her or because they're imagining it I would say that raises further issues.

That's usually the last thing on my mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ms. Toad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-14-09 04:55 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Oberlin's done it informally since 1968
when they made dorms co-ed, and couples quickly figured out how that two couples could get one guy's room and one women's room and swap roomates.

Formally, since the 2007-2008 school year.

http://www2.oberlin.edu/175/didyouknow-coed.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
imdjh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-14-09 04:52 PM
Response to Original message
2. Why would any guy want to live with girls? They're moody and notoriously bad housekeepers. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MNDemNY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-14-09 04:53 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. And they gots "cooties".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JonQ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-14-09 04:56 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. That's a stereotype
in reality the latest studies have shown only 15-23% of college age girls have cooties. And of those only about 5% are contagious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KamaAina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-14-09 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. They have a vaccine for that now
and no, it won't give you autism! :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 06:08 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC