Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Let’s be clear, Rush was rejected by his kind, a bunch of “rich white guys”

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
wndycty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-15-09 10:37 AM
Original message
Let’s be clear, Rush was rejected by his kind, a bunch of “rich white guys”
Edited on Thu Oct-15-09 10:39 AM by wndycty
Let’s be clear, Rush was rejected by his kind, a bunch of “rich white guys”

cross posted at: http://blog.windycitywatch.com/2009/10/lets-be-clear-rush-was-rejected-by-his.html

Sure Reverends Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton threatened to raise hell if the investors group Rush Limbaugh was part of was allowed to purchase the St. Louis Rams, the NFL Players Association spoke out against his bid and a number of African American players said they wouldn’t play for him, but at the end of the day he was not rejected by them, he was rejected by a bunch of “rich white guys.”

Rush wants you to think he is a victim and it’s a rejection of his conservative politics, but this is not about politics, this is about bigotry and business. The other “rich white guys” rejected Limbaugh’s special brand of racism, homophobia and misogyny and know that it is bad for business. Limbaugh’s mistake was thinking that other “rich white guys” would embrace his bigotry or at the least they would ignore it.

Before blaming liberals, minorities, women, the LGBT community and the media, Limbaugh needs to accept the fact that they (we) did not make the decision to prevent him from owning an NFL franchise. They (we) don’t have that power.

Limbaugh’s first call should be to his partner in the deal, “rich white guy” Dave Checketts, who made the decision to dump him from the group. Checketts had the opportunity to say “Rush, forget the haters I got your back, we are going to forge ahead and win this bid. Don’t you worry, after all we are ‘rich white guys.’”

Instead Checketts effectively said “look man, you aren’t worth the trouble. Besides most of us ‘rich white’ guys don’t think like you.”

Checketts made his decision because he knew that other “rich white guys,” including NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell and Indianapolis Colts owner Jim Irsay, were opposed to Limbaugh being part of the group bidding on the Rams.

I don’t blame Limbaugh for being upset and feeling betrayed. I am sure he is friendly with a lot of NFL owners, many of who share his conservative political ideology. They most likely run into each other at airports as they land or take off in their private jets, they probably share luxury suites at sporting events and they probably dine together at swanky restaurants. Some (NOT ALL) of them might have even sent him a complimentary note or two telling him how funny it is when he calls President Obama a “Halfrican American” or “Barack the Magic Negro.”

While I mentioned some owners share Limbaugh’s views, it would be negligent of me not to acknowledge the good guys like Goodel, Irsay and Dan Rooney of the Pittsburgh Steelers, who have worked hard to make sure that the league leads by example when it comes to diversity and social responsibility.

Limbaugh probably thought the other NFL owners would have his back, after all they have the whole “rich white guy” thing in common. But unlike Limbaugh, they know that if they want to remain rich Limbaugh is someone that they cannot afford to do business with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-15-09 10:40 AM
Response to Original message
1. limbaugh was rejected because of his extremist views /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-15-09 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
2. I think his history of drug abuse has more to do with it
than his rabid broadcasting style. After all, those rich, white football owner guys mostly share his politics.

I'm glad this is hitting him hard, that it's the end of a lifelong dream he's had. It's high time Mr. Arrogance had something happen to deflate that ego.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rvablue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-15-09 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #2
10. They share his politics but they aren't on the airwaves every day spewing bile
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wndycty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-15-09 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #10
13. Dan Rooney, Pittsburgh Steelers, doesn't share his politics
He backed Obama

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rvablue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-15-09 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #13
20. That's fine. Like to learn new things. But look at this:
Sorry for the link to Politico.....


NFL owners, team officials, players and coaches have overwhelmingly favored Republicans with their political contributions, according to a study released Thursday by the Center for Responsive Politics.



http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0909/27299.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wndycty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-15-09 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. I have no problem with that. . .we can't force folks to think a certain way. . .
. . .people who hold opposing political views are not the enemy, just for holding opposing views.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-15-09 10:42 AM
Response to Original message
3. Happy, happy, joy, joy!
I'm doing stimpy's dance right now
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cbdo2007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-15-09 10:43 AM
Response to Original message
4. Look at the sponsors running from Glen Beck. The last thing a football team needs is a liability
like Limbaugh pushing sponsors or fans away due to his ridiculous viewpoint.

I really think the Beck situation had a direct influence on this as I'm not sure if that hadn't just happened that we would be seeing this outcome.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
randr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-15-09 10:43 AM
Response to Original message
5. Rush and his minion of minority are unacceptable in American society
As soon as everyone stops thinking this asshole has any power, with his audience of 1/2 of one percent of the American population, half of which listen because they hate him, we can move on and remember that this is a great country with high values. He is not one of us!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CoffeeCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-15-09 10:47 AM
Response to Original message
6. Rush Limbaugh is an embarrassment...
The crazy, arch-conservatives with which he surrounds himself, make him feel invulnerable--because they're so
busy praising his nutty rants.

And I'm sure Rush travels in elite circles, and that most people are polite to him--the truth is that Rush
is an embarrassment. Only the fringe 10 percent agree with him. To the rest of the world he's a circus act.
He's not respected, even though his success is acknowledged.

The vast majority of people in this country think Limbaugh is a joke. You only have to listen to his show
for a couple of hours--to understand what a clown he is. Then, you've got the drug habit and the yucky
rumors about his trips to the Dominican Republic.

I am very glad this happened though. Between his callers, the crazy conservatives who adore him and the sycophants
who surround him---it's rare that Rush really understands how the world views him. Beyond the "golden EIB microphone"
is reality---and it's great that Rush finally got a heavy dose of it.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newtothegame Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-15-09 10:54 AM
Response to Original message
7. Can we drop the race part of it please? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bullwinkle428 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-15-09 10:56 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. Rush is the one who dragged race into this, on countless occasions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wndycty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-15-09 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #7
12. Race has everything to do with it, he was not rejected because he is a conservative
He was rejected because he was a bigot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flying Dream Blues Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-15-09 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #7
14. Why? He's made no bones about the fact he's a racist. Not exactly
what the NFL is looking for in SO many ways, but racism is certainly a part of it.

He's a hateful man and I hope this is just the beginning of him getting what he deserves. I put a great deal of the blame for the toxic political environment squarely on his shoulders.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nolabear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-15-09 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
8. Darn. I was SO looking forward to hearing the opposing teams' cheers.
Gimme an "O"
Gimme an "X"
Gimme a "Y"

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-15-09 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
11. He was rejected because the rich white guys couldn't get...
the rich black guys to play for him.

Which means he was rejected for his racism
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wndycty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-15-09 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #11
15. And maybe some of those rich white guys deplore him for what he is. . .
. . .I bet you Dan Rooney is not a fan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proteus_lives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-15-09 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. Yep.
Rich white guy doesn't always equal hardcore rethug. Anymore than poor/middle class black always equal Democrat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wndycty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-15-09 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. I hope I made that clear in the OP
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Festivito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-15-09 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
18. He was their hired help, not their buddy. /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-15-09 12:17 PM
Response to Original message
19. Not all 'rich white guys' are created equal.
Some of them do something good with their money
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lukasahero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-15-09 01:04 PM
Response to Original message
22. You're right but you're also wrong
You're right that he was rejected by rich white guys. But you're wrong (and this is where Rush is wrong, too) when you say they're "his kind". They're not - not by a long shot. They think he's a loud-mouth, drug-addled, delusional, uneducated blowhard. They're right, of course.

Just because someone has money doesn't automatically put them in the same class as others who have money. Rush, and the ignoramuses who follow him, need to learn that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wndycty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-15-09 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. That is why I used quotes for "rich white guys" because he thinks that is all he needs. . .
. . .to be accepted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lukasahero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-15-09 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. Ah
Wasn't sure why you used the quotes (could read 2 ways - I picked wrong :blush:)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wndycty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-16-09 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. No problem
I took a risk by using "rich white guys" a lot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Initech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-16-09 04:12 PM
Response to Original message
26. That piece of shit deserved what he got.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 11:47 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC