Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bailout Helps Fuel a New Era of Wall Street Wealth

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
girl gone mad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-17-09 06:20 AM
Original message
Bailout Helps Fuel a New Era of Wall Street Wealth
"Many americans wonder how this can possibly be"?

The idea that the banks were going to take the money we were giving them and lend it back to us was always stupid. No one should be surprised that they chose to use the funds to speculate in markets, then pay themselves huge bonuses. That's what modern investment banks are designed to do.

Bailout Helps Fuel a New Era of Wall Street Wealth
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/17/business/economy/17wall.html?ref=business">New York Times


Even as the economy continues to struggle, much of Wall Street is minting money — and looking forward again to hefty bonuses.

Many Americans wonder how this can possibly be. How can some banks be prospering so soon after a financial collapse, even as legions of people worry about losing their jobs and their homes?

It may come as a surprise that one of the most powerful forces driving the resurgence on Wall Street is not the banks but Washington. Many of the steps that policy makers took last year to stabilize the financial system — reducing interest rates to near zero, bolstering big banks with taxpayer money, guaranteeing billions of dollars of financial institutions’ debts — helped set the stage for this new era of Wall Street wealth.

Titans like Goldman Sachs and JPMorgan Chase are making fortunes in hot areas like trading stocks and bonds, rather than in the ho-hum business of lending people money. They also are profiting by taking risks that weaker rivals are unable or unwilling to shoulder — a benefit of less competition after the failure of some investment firms last year.

So even as big banks fight efforts in Congress to subject their industry to greater regulation — and to impose some restrictions on executive pay — Wall Street has Washington to thank in part for its latest bonanza.

“All of this is facilitated by the Federal Reserve and the government, who really want financial institutions to get back to lending,” said Gary Richardson, a research fellow at the National Bureau of Economic Research. “But we have just shown them that they can have the most frightening things happen to them, and we will throw trillions of dollars to protect them. I have big concerns about that.”

Not all banks are doing so well. Giants like Citigroup and Bank of America, whose fortunes are tied to the ups-and-downs of ordinary consumers, are struggling to turn themselves around, as are many regional banks.

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/17/business/economy/17wall.html?ref=business">More...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-17-09 06:31 AM
Response to Original message
1. Giant fucking waste of tax payers money
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
corpseratemedia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-17-09 07:50 AM
Response to Original message
2. The Dems need to reregulate and break up these monster banks if they want to stay in power
I know personally the underhanded and ouright lies and crooked tactics banks like Wells Fargo are using to force people into foreclosure rather than renegotiate.

The DLC "moderate" Dems owned by the banks are blinding themselves to how angry the public is regarding their assistance in helping to perpetuate massive financial fraud.

I know GS gave the most money to Obama, but if he isn't aggressive enough (he really needs to replace Geithner as this debacle goes on), he will forever be tied to enabling the pillage of this country by the banks.

http://www.amazon.com/Takes-Pillage-Bailouts-Backroom-Washington/dp/0470529598
snip<

Top Ten Ways Things Could Get Worse from Here
Amazon-exclusive content from author Nomi Prins
The government has nearly convinced the public they have everything under control, when that’s far from the case. In fact, everything could go downhill fast. Here are ten all-too-likely scenarios I look at in my book, It Takes a Pillage:

1. The actual bailout has quietly ballooned to $16 trillion dollars (not including over $3 trillion set aside for money market funds), most of it given out with no strings attached. Wall Street firms could continue to tout the myth that ‘talent’ must be paid for – now with stupid sums of bonus money, funded by the American People.

2. The stock market, which has rallied substantially since the government started giving out free money to the banking industry, could tank on the realization that if that money needed to be paid back any time soon, the banks wouldn’t be good for it.

3. Because bigger is better still seems to be Fed policy, JPM Chase could acquire Bank of America – Merrill Lynch, creating one of the largest, federally subsidized banking firms in the world.

4. Because the bigger just can’t help getting badder, JPM Chase could also acquire Citigroup, and we’d be living with a monopoly economy.

5. We could sink into the delusion that the Obama administration has actually done something to restrain Wall Street, lulling us into a false sense of security. Then the remaining big banks will screw us again.

6. Congress could continue to ignore history and never reinstate the Glass-Steagall Act. That act made banks smaller, more specialized, easier to regulate and less expensive to bail out. Repealing it lead to this mess, and there’s barely a whisper heard in Washington of bringing it back.

7. As a Fed approved bank holding company, Goldman Sachs could buy a lot of small banks just to get access to all the money in savings and checking accounts to gamble with. Plus they’d have that great $250,000 FDIC guarantee they get per account. This would make them the biggest bank in the country.

8. Every bank and government agency with access to some aspect of a federal bailout could max out their subsidies chips at once – pushing the full bailout cost to over $26 trillion.

9. Many mid-sized and smaller banks didn’t need a bailout and have been better at allowing consumers access to credit. The largest banks, flush with federal funding and a poor record of helping average Americans, could buy them all up.

10. The Fed could continue to operate in secrecy, despite multiple moves by Congress to push for a full audit of its largesse. Right now, only the Fed knows what the real worst case scenarios might actually be....>snip


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-17-09 07:52 AM
Response to Original message
3. THANK GOD IT PASSED!!!
Remember that one?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frank Booth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-17-09 02:30 PM
Response to Original message
4. I wish the media would stop saying the big banks are profiting by taking risks.
There's only risk if there's downside. If you have the entire weight of the Treasury, Federal Reserve, and the poor sucker American taxpayers guaranteeing your losses, you've got no risk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-17-09 02:59 PM
Response to Original message
5. !

NOW we have Your Children’s Money too !!!
And there is not a fucking thing you can do about it!
Now THIS is “Bi-Partisan Consensus” !
Better get used to it!!
Hahahahahahahahaha!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karmadillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-20-09 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
6. Democrats prove very willing to dance with the ones who bought them.
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romulox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-20-09 10:35 AM
Response to Original message
7. Do DU's "free market' ranters not see these threads?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bgno64 Donating Member (255 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-20-09 11:10 AM
Response to Original message
8. We're screwed
Wall Street wins. If Dems crack down campaign contributions will all go to Repubs. If Dems try to hang onto the campaign cash, that means they can't crack down. Either way Wall Street gets what it wants, and we're hosed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 05:16 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC