|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
babylonsister (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-17-09 11:29 AM Original message |
Jindal, Landrieu call for removal of judge who wouldn't perform interracial marriage |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasObserver (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-17-09 11:29 AM Response to Original message |
1. Somewhere they're drawing up a complaint for the Judicial Conduct Commission. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yellowcanine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-17-09 11:31 AM Response to Original message |
2. It is time to outlaw use of "for the children" as an excuse for bad behavior. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bucky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-17-09 11:35 AM Response to Reply #2 |
4. Do you mean like for child support payment laws or for environmental laws? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yellowcanine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-17-09 11:38 AM Response to Reply #4 |
7. No-I mean as an excuse for what would otherwise be considered bad behavior. I will edit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProgressiveProfessor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-17-09 11:51 AM Response to Reply #2 |
9. There is much evil done in their name. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
enid602 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-17-09 12:30 PM Response to Reply #2 |
13. biracial |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bucky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-17-09 03:11 PM Response to Reply #13 |
16. There's more than one way to be "biracial". Often mixed black & white people don't get along. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-17-09 03:01 PM Response to Reply #2 |
15. That's just a cover-up to make this seem less overtly racial. But |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bucky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-17-09 11:33 AM Response to Original message |
3. Loving vs Virginia |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jack Rabbit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-17-09 11:35 AM Response to Original message |
5. Bipartisanship at last |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-17-09 12:17 PM Response to Reply #5 |
10. Ain't it grand?! :)nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ginnyinWI (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-17-09 11:37 AM Response to Original message |
6. if it is not against the law to refuse to marry someone-- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lolly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-17-09 11:42 AM Response to Reply #6 |
8. Not for a clergyman |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warpy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-17-09 12:23 PM Response to Reply #6 |
12. It's against the law for a government official |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bumblebee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-17-09 12:22 PM Response to Original message |
11. and what about Mr. Vitter (R)? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-17-09 12:52 PM Response to Reply #11 |
14. He is conspicuously absent, isn't he. He's probably applauding somewhere. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spanone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-17-09 03:17 PM Response to Reply #11 |
17. very good question, one would think a curious media would ask.....naaaaaaw |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cynatnite (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-17-09 03:19 PM Response to Original message |
18. That last line is just perfect! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Wed May 01st 2024, 06:17 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC