Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Poll: Palin plummets, Huckabee leads field of GOP hopefuls for 2012

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
stevedeshazer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-19-09 09:30 PM
Original message
Poll: Palin plummets, Huckabee leads field of GOP hopefuls for 2012
http://www.examiner.com/x-13600-Philadelphia-Opinion-Polls-Examiner~y2009m10d19-Poll-Palin-plummets-Huckabee-leads-field-of-GOP-hopefuls-for-2012

:rofl:

<snip>

Two recent polls show a further decline in support for Sarah Palin while Mike Huckabee leads a hypothetical field of Republican candidates for President in 2012.

Sarah’s slide is a rather sudden one after several months of maintaining fairly steady numbers. The presence of the electrifying GOP upstart who joined John McCain’s Presidential ticket last year was greeted warmly by Republicans and many independents alike. Her recent struggles have been reported on by the likes of Gallup and Rasmussen Reports. In late-July Palin’s favorable ratings dropped into the negatives for the first time. Now her numbers amongst adults are mired at a 40% positive against 50% negative split, by far the worst ratings she has received since her introduction to the national stage in late-August of last year.

----

I don't believe anything this crappy website says but it's fun to see the right wingers humping Mike Huckabee as a front-runner. What, Duncan Hunter and Tom Tancredo haven't declared yet? And where is Kenneth the Page?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MrModerate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-19-09 09:33 PM
Response to Original message
1. Huckabee: the genial psychopath.
He'd be fun to run against too. Not as much fun as Palin, but that was always verrrrry unlikely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-20-09 05:22 AM
Response to Reply #1
9. Definitely has the fundy psycho eyes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-19-09 09:35 PM
Response to Original message
2. Who would pay for a poll now?
In three years, Huckabee's going to be older and more out of touch. Palin will be about as welcome (and redolent) as one of those dead fish she's so fond of. I think the Republican nominee will be someone practically nobody's heard of yet. Look for a medium-size state governor, or some middle of the pack Senator.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevedeshazer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-19-09 11:34 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Hell yes.
A poll in October 2009 will have no bearing on a poll in October 2012.

I'm just having fun.

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-20-09 07:37 AM
Response to Reply #6
12. Whoops, not directed at you
I was thinking that someone, somewhere sank money into a poll of Republican presidential hopefuls in October 2009. The sheesh factor was too much for me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BolivarianHero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-19-09 11:36 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. Please let it be Tom Coburn...
That guy is so big a moran that he makes * look like Eisenhower and Eisenhower look like Lincoln.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chulanowa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-19-09 09:37 PM
Response to Original message
3. I guess they realized Palin has ovaries
and came to their conservative senses!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-19-09 09:41 PM
Response to Original message
4. Wayne DuMond
Cough! Ahem! Oh did I say that?!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-19-09 09:48 PM
Response to Original message
5. If Obama is our generation's FDR, then Palin is our generation's Dan Quayle.
She hasn't just jumped the shark, she's actually jumped Fonzie jumping the shark.

I never thought I'd see the day, but apparently George W. Bush has ruined stupid for the Republicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-20-09 05:12 AM
Response to Original message
8. I'm kind of rooting for a GOP primary field that begins with their
candidates gnawing the flesh off each other and pretty much stays that way through at least May or June of 2012.

Part of that would be the various little GOP darlings trying to out-crazy each other to grab the lion's share of the nutbag demographic.

The more successful the eventual nominee is in appealing to the unstable and crazy GOP primary voter, the easier it will be for us to re-elect Barack Obama. In a manner of speaking, in winning the Republican nomination, a Republican candidate ensures his or her defeat in the general.

IMO Huckabee is the most formidable of their possible candidates because on the surface he seems perfectly calm and normal. Given real power, the other Mike Huckabee -- the psychotic Far-Right demon -- would emerge.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-20-09 05:36 AM
Response to Original message
10. One of the variables that could change the polling outcomes is the
popularity of the incumbent.

Palin, Romney, and Huckabee have no electoral scaffolding. They're free agents, so to say. They have no current office to build a positive profile on one hand and no current office for their opponents to pluck objections. It's clear the three of them are extremely interested in living in the White House.

Republican supporters of Sarah Palin, IMO, risk losing the gamble that she can win their nomination and in the process, they also risk losing their own positions in the GOP apparatus. Public GOP enthusiasm for Palin has visibly cooled. I don't think she believes she's history yet, but that doesn't mean she's viable either. I'd like to see her jump in to the Republican primary and scramble the outcomes in Iowa and New Hampshire at least.

Romney and Huck both are ego-monsters. The best outcome for us is that they both perceive the GOP nomination within their grasp and behave in monstrous ways, often in the public eye, to secure their position as "frontrunner." Maybe Huckabee wins in Iowa and maybe Romney in New Hampshire. That ought to prolong the bitterness, the discord, the hyper-competitive ego-driven nomination process well into the spring.

Likely there'd be at least one dark horse candidate to rise on the GOP horizon after Palin falters. In another set of circumstances it might have been John Ensign or Mark Sanford. Instead, it could be Mike Pence, the bullet-headed fascist from Indiana, or someone even worse. I'm not thinking Jindal here and not Gingrich. But if Huckabee and Romney are deadlocked by late March it could set the stage for a Jeb Bush late entry.

The Republicans are so crazy it's really difficult to guess what they'll do next.

If Palin's internal polling suggests that she cannot easily win either Iowa or New Hampshire or both, I could see her making a third party run, which would likely draw a few flies away from the eventual GOP ticket.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-20-09 06:11 AM
Response to Original message
11. And In 2005....
The "pundits" were all certain that Hillary would be the Democratic nominee...there wasn't anyone else on the radar close to her while Barack Obama wasn't on many radars. Such is how good the "punditry" and the "activists" represent the rank and file.

The GOOP is a very fluid party right now with no real leadership or direction. The only thing that is binding is its hate. I'm not surprised by Hucklenutz doing so well...he's the least "offensive" of the candidates. Mittens still is a moron and a Mormon...still unelectable in the current GOOP primary set up and Mooselini continues to piss off the party regulars and remain the butt of jokes. By not being either of the two, Hucklenutz is carefully positioning himself as the "reasonable" rushpublican despite being as bat shit crazy as any of 'em.

A lot rides on next year's elections...moreso for the GOOP than Democrats. They can't afford any more losses and it would be hard considering most of the remaining rushpublicans come from the reddest districts around. If they fail to recapture either house, their current leadership stands a good chance of paying the price and in a party that is fragmented and heading further off the abyss the void will lead to even greater divisions into 2012. Hate may keep a party together, but it won't win elections.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecstatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-20-09 07:42 AM
Response to Original message
13. Huckabee has been allowed to campaign in the form of a TV show
Of course he's the GOP choice for 2012.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peekaloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-20-09 07:53 AM
Response to Original message
14. Kenneth the Page lacks the proper negotiating skills.
Although his belief in local folklore may get him face time with the crazies asking his opponents to sign a piece of paper with "I'm a big fat liar" is not a good campaign tactic. :dunce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim__ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-20-09 07:56 AM
Response to Original message
15. Too bad. I'd love to see Palin get the repub nod. - n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 10:46 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC