Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WSJ: Worthless tripe... Look at this crap...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
ReverendDeuce Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-22-09 01:36 PM
Original message
WSJ: Worthless tripe... Look at this crap...
I was in the company break room grabbing a coffee and picked up the WSJ and flipped around to the opinion page and found this gem of uncredited prose:


The Public Option Makes a Comeback
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704500604574485452637584852.html

... snip ...

But the reality is that no one wants a public option except the political left. Doctors and hospitals hate the idea as much as insurers do—and they're far from natural allies. The media are able to counterfeit public support, such as this week's Washington Post/ABC News poll showing 57% in favor, only by asking rigged questions about "choice" and "competition." Who's opposed to that?

The negotiators crafting the Senate bill, headed by Majority Leader Harry Reid and White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel, may attempt some backdoor public option. They might allow states to opt in, or to opt out. Or the new entitlement might be "triggered" if certain conditions aren't met. No one should be fooled. For liberals the key is to get the architecture in place this year and expand it over time, much like Henry Waxman and the late Ted Kennedy did with Medicaid in the 1970s and '80s.

At least for now, we still don't see how Democrats get to 60 votes with a public option. But its revival shows that the Democratic Party's left is running this show, and how radical their plans for U.S. health care really are.


I went back to my office, grabbed a Sharpie pen, circled this piece and wrote "Total bullshit!" and left the paper open for the next visitor the the breakroom.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NoSheep Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-22-09 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
1. Good for you. I do that too. We get it at work and I frequently editorialize on page 1.
B-) I'd piss on it if I thought I could get by with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SidneyCarton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-22-09 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
2. If no one wants the PO but the political left...
Then the Republicans are doomed, because apparently the "political left" comprises between 60-80% of the electorate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-22-09 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. Apparently about two-thirds of the country is now the political left
The dinosaurs at the Wall Street Journal should be gettin' a leetle nervous about now, methinks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
randr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-22-09 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
3. You must remember that the WSJ is now Faux Country
and hardly worth a gander.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YOY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-22-09 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
4. Rupe a dupe!
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikki Stone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-22-09 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
5. It's now a Rupert Murdoch rag: you can't trust it anymore.
...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughBeaumont Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-22-09 01:45 PM
Response to Original message
6. War is Peace. Freedom is Slavery. Ignorance is Strength.
Edited on Thu Oct-22-09 01:48 PM by HughBeaumont
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-22-09 01:47 PM
Response to Original message
8. Awesome! I might just try that too!
I just had to redirect our local Pubbie to some facts misrepresented in said rag... regarding Pubbie input in the health care bill creation and vetting process... he showed me a WSJ article saying the Pubbies were being forced out and no one is listening to their ideas... waaaaaaa... waaaaaaa...

I had to point him to the facts... there are over 160 Pubbie amendments currently residing in the bill in question. Stammer... cough... stammer...

Yeah, WSJ is worth lining a bird cage, but that's about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-22-09 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
9. 1. It's an op ed piece. 2. It's in the Wall Street Journal. 3. WSJ is owned by Murdoch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC