Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

So much for their initial lockdown of Ambler Hall

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
rainbow4321 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-17-07 10:20 PM
Original message
So much for their initial lockdown of Ambler Hall
The first shooting happened at 7:15am, yet students were getting to leave the building at 7:45 am.


http://collegemedia.com/

Tuesday, April 17th 2007 7:58PM
Students state lockdown occurred late morning

Students have stated that Ambler-Johnston Hall was not on lockdown until as late as 10 a.m. yesterday morning.

Meredith Hawkins, a sixth floor West Ambler-Johnston resident described how the halls weren't under firm security measures until after the second shooting had occurred. "My roommate left for class at 7:45," Hawkins said, "and she left the dorm as if nothing had happened."

"Nothing seemed out of the ordinary at all." Hawkins said.

"The first word of any lockdown didn't happen until around 9:45 or so," Hawkins said. "But they were allowing people to leave, but if you did leave you weren't allowed back in."

"It was around 10 or so, maybe even later, that they stopped letting people leaving entirely, but before then, you could just go as you please." Hawkins said.

Joann Cassano, a sophomore 4th floor West Ambler-Johnston resident, confirmed the same description of the supposed lockdown of the building.
"Us 4th floor people were allowed to leave around 9:10," Cassano said.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-17-07 10:21 PM
Response to Original message
1. Can you legally lockdown adults?
Isn't that unlawful imprisonment?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rainbow4321 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-17-07 10:24 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Hmmm. I'm thinking double murder trumps pretty much anything
Especially if the person who did the shooting is gone MIA from the murder scene. Seems like NO one should have been allowed to leave, at least not within 30 minutes of the murder itself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-17-07 10:24 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Yeah, that's what Bush said...
Edited on Tue Apr-17-07 10:27 PM by Bornaginhooligan
when he went and signed the PATRIOT act.

"Seems like NO one should have been allowed to leave, at least not within 30 minutes of the murder itself."

Maybe if the dorm happened to be a creepy manor out on the moors during a dark and stormy night. But I'd imagine the shooter would have already left long before the police ever showed up.

The point of a "lockdown," Rainbow, is to keep a crazed gunman who's on the outside of the building from getting in. It's not supposed to keep the guy on the inside from getting out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-17-07 10:45 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. The Parents entrust their childrens safety to the University...
Edited on Tue Apr-17-07 10:46 PM by MadMaddie
It is the Universities responsibility to ensure that the students are safe....If there is a roaming gunman on campus...lockdown is the only logical solution.

If it were say an office building of any sort the police have been known to lockdown the facility until they have the situation under control and all suspects identified.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Midlodemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-17-07 10:59 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. And therein lies the problem.
How do you lock down 2000+ acres with 26,000 students in multiple buildings?

It's not possible. It's not like containing a single building by locking several doors.

One of my friends didn't get hold of one of her sons until 2PM yesterday. He lives off campus, didn't have a class until later and his cell phone was dead. He could have walked right into a slaughterhouse, but thank God he didn't.

Loyola is trying out a text message emergency system that Tech had been looking into several months ago, but again, how many professors require that cell phones be off in class? How many kids silence their phones in class?

I wish I had the answer to this, but I'm at a loss. I don't think the University acted irresponsibly and neither do the kids I know who attend Tech. (and I live in VA, it's a lot)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-17-07 11:05 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. I am glad that your friends son is safe.
I am a Project Manager by trade...I eventually want to move intodisaster planning and mitigation planning....

If the US can plan (well excluding the current administration) to protect the entire country...we can definitely do a better job planning and protecting our Universities etc....

Mitigation plans have to address likely and least likely scenarios and how they are addressed...they may be hypotheticals but at least they are thought out plans...

I agree the Communication systems on campuses must be improved to communicate with students, parents and faculty...The plan has to be multi-faceted....

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Midlodemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-17-07 11:08 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. In all honesty, I think the wrong people are being put in charge of
this type of thing and I don't mean you at all.

This is a common sense thing. Think it through. Decide what makes sense. How to reach the greatest number in the smallest amount of time.

I think the powers that be that are 'looking into it' don't know the first thing about it, but that certainly wouldn't be the first time that I thought I could run circles around their logic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-18-07 12:18 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. You are right about the wrong people...it truely is common sense
but their is a science behind it as well...

I think that states, cities, campuses have to come together and come up with an overall strategical plan....the campuses for example cannot do it without working with local Fire and Police departments, police have to have a common yet specific way to react to these events....and so on...

At this point anyone could run circles around the powers that be...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rainbow4321 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-18-07 01:08 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. At the time of the initial incident
it was just the building that was a crime scene. The hotel across from my house had someone stabbed in their parking lot last summer. I was driving by it right after it happened and the entire area around the hotel/parking lot/field was blockaded off with that yellow crime tape.

If the students who were leaving that building (within 30 minutes of the murders) are saying they couldn't even tell that something happened there obviously there was no such thing done. Everyone in that dorm should have been told to stay put, building exits covered by campus law enforcements and people questioned and warned as they were trying to leave. One would think if a double murder just happened in the building there would have been a little more hoopla as a student tried to leave. We should be hearing stories from kids who tried to leave so soon after the murders that they were stopped by officers, etc...not that they just walked out and everything seemed like a normal day. Why was the building not surrounded with VT police cars, ambulances, etc?? Sounds like they were trying to take the "low key" approach.

VT officials dropped the ball right there with that contained crime scene and they know it. And have they ever explained why they thought (as they had said publically on Monday) the dorm shooter "had left campus and probably the **state**"? I'd like to know the officials name who initially uttered those words and find out what evidence he found to believe that. Someone on another website compared it to the fool who told the WTC building workers to "go back to your desk, everything is fine".





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kiahzero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-18-07 01:16 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. They thought they had the killer.
They were talking to a "person of interest" they had detained when the murders in the engineering building started to take place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 06:31 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC