War is a Hate Crime

http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/20091026_war_is_a_hate_crime/

By Chris Hedges

Violence against lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender people is wrong. So is violence against people in Afghanistan and Iraq. But in the bizarre culture of identity politics, there are no alliances among the oppressed. The Matthew Shepard and James Byrd Jr. Hate Crimes Prevention Act, the first major federal civil rights law protecting lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender people, passed last week, was attached to a $680-billion measure outlining the Pentagon’s budget, which includes $130 billion for ongoing military operations in Iraq and Afghanistan. The Democratic majority in Congress, under the cover of protecting some innocents, authorized massive acts of violence against other innocents.

It was a clever piece of marketing. It blunted debate about new funding for war. And behind the closed doors of the caucus rooms, the Democratic leadership told Blue Dog Democrats, who are squeamish about defending gays or lesbians from hate crimes, that they could justify the vote as support for the war. They told liberal Democrats, who are squeamish about unlimited funding for war, that they could defend the vote as a step forward in the battle for civil rights. Gender equality groups, by selfishly narrowing their concern to themselves, participated in the dirty game.

“Every thinking person wants to take a stand against hate crimes, but isn’t war the most offensive of hate crimes?” asked Rep. Dennis Kucinich, who did not vote for the bill, when I spoke to him by phone. “To have people have to make a choice, or contemplate the hierarchy of hate crimes, is cynical. I don’t vote to fund wars. If you are opposed to war, you don’t vote to authorize or appropriate money. Congress, historically and constitutionally, has the power to fund or defund a war. The more Congress participates in authorizing spending for war, the more likely it is that we will be there for a long, long time. This reflects an even larger question. All the attention is paid to what President Obama is going to do right now with respect to Iraq and Afghanistan. The truth is the Democratic Congress could have ended the war when it took control just after 2006. We were given control of the Congress by the American people in November 2006 specifically to end the war. It did not happen. The funding continues. And while the attention is on the president, Congress clearly has the authority at any time to stop the funding. And yet it doesn’t. Worse yet, it finds other ways to garner votes for bills that authorize funding for war. The spending juggernaut moves forward, a companion to the inconscient force of war itself.”

The brutality of Matthew Shepard’s killers, who beat him to death for being gay, is a product of a culture that glorifies violence and sadism. It is the product of a militarized culture. We have more police, prisons, inmates, spies, mercenaries, weapons and troops than any other nation on Earth. Our military, which swallows half of the federal budget, is enormously popular—as if it is not part of government. The military values of hyper-masculinity, blind obedience and violence are an electric current that run through reality television and trash-talk programs where contestants endure pain while they betray and manipulate those around them in a ruthless world of competition. Friendship and compassion are banished.

http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/20091026_war_is_a_hate_crime/">More...

to grab at a chance for some legal protections. F off

This convulted POS "article" blames gays for the Hate Crimes bill, as if we are the ones who attached a war funding attachment. It also paints gays wanting equal protection as selfish. Yet one more piece of crap 'blaming' the gays...now for the funding of the war.

It's less substance and more slogan. War funding was going to pass. Nothing scares politicians like being accused of hating the military. Being happy that some good came out of that bill is not selfish.

by the DLC right who run our Party. The intent is to divide the anti-war and civil-rights movements within the Party in order to weaken both. They throw the GLBT rights community a few crumbs in the hopes of splitting some folks away from the progressive coalition.

Looks like it's working with a few here at DU.

I find it offensive that Hedges seems to want to make gays feel bad about being happy that they got some scraps tossed at them. Hedges seems to be arguing that if the bills had been separate, war funding would have been denied. I disagree. War funding was going to pass because, again, politicians are terrified of being accused of not supporting the troops. Further, this is the only item on which Republicans and at least 1/3 of the Democrats agree. That being the case, it is completely disingenuous to imply that it passed because of progressives being forced to vote for it due to the Hate Crimes Prevention Act.

would not have passed. It simply argues that voting for it was still immoral and wrong, even with the hate crimes language included. And I agree. "It would have passed anyway" doesn't qualify as a satisfactory excuse for bad votes, IMO.

"Gender equality groups, by selfishly narrowing their concern to themselves, participated in the dirty game."

Those people aren't voting. They know that the War Funding will pass and they want to take advantage of that fact to get a good piece of legislation through Congress.

When any interest group participates in such a "dirty game" to move their own issue forward, they damage the whole progressive mevement in the longer run. This really isn't a GLBT exclusive problem at all. The right wing of our Party, and our Party's leadership, plays this dirty divide-and-conquer game with all of us quite regularly. And most issue groups on the left fall for it every time.

to not want to be bombed from the air and burned to death? Selfish little shits.

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

Equivocating for the Great DK I see.

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

:shrug:

and that DK voted for, doesn't mention Afghanistan.

"To authorize the use of United States Armed Forces against those responsible for the recent attacks launched against the United States."

If not he is a fool.


Edited to add. Maybe he was just protecting his Senate seat, if so that is even more disgusting.
:puke: