Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

So where do you stand on this science issue.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Evilismdestroyer07 Donating Member (26 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-18-07 04:19 AM
Original message
So where do you stand on this science issue.
I think it would be cool if we could get our canidates to sign on for something ambitous like Kennedy did. We already used going to the moon... Im curious what, if any, ideas everyone would have on revitilizing our scientific industries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DCKit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-18-07 04:25 AM
Response to Original message
1. Hmm, not to state the obvious, but energy independence and global warming sound like a good start
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
youngdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-18-07 06:17 AM
Response to Original message
2. Tax exemptions and tax free income for companies developing renewable resources
for 10 years.

Also, government sponsored "X" prizes for accomplishing certain benchmarks - renewable energy benchmarks, car mileage goals, efficiency technologies, renewable building materials, new drugs for smaller diseases, coastal protection technology, food productivity technology, etc.

Double NASA funding.

Enforce drug patent laws so drug companies are forced to innovate to keep profits up instead of lobbying Congress for exceptions, extensions and use changes - will also mean cheaper drugs for the public.

Pass laws that discourage patent squatting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tkmorris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-18-07 06:27 AM
Response to Original message
3. Bring back the super-collider. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tesha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-18-07 07:57 AM
Response to Original message
4. Commercially-viable Fusion Energy by 2030.
Push the IER goals up by twenty years; the
world can't wait.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ITER

Tesha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 10:19 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC