|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
sinkingfeeling (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-29-09 03:17 PM Original message |
For those of you following the HCR thru Congress, here's where we are. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nicholas D Wolfwood (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-29-09 03:19 PM Response to Original message |
1. Thank you. That perspective is sorely needed. (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NYC_SKP (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-29-09 03:19 PM Response to Original message |
2. We've got weeks and weeks of dramatic expressions of outrage and despair ahead. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aSpeckofDust (292 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-29-09 03:21 PM Response to Reply #2 |
3. On the bright side, by the time we get the HCR, it'll be 2013! We wont have to wait! N/T |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gblady (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-29-09 03:28 PM Response to Reply #3 |
4. good one |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
damntexdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-29-09 03:29 PM Response to Original message |
5. But much further along than in 1992-94, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fumesucker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-29-09 03:30 PM Response to Original message |
6. TARP: Proposed on Sept 19, 2008, enacted Oct 3, 2008 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sinkingfeeling (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-29-09 03:39 PM Response to Reply #6 |
7. Did you know they first started talking about this in 1920's? Medicare was |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fumesucker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-29-09 04:09 PM Response to Reply #7 |
12. I've heard that ,yes.. Don't know the details.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ruby the Liberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-29-09 03:53 PM Response to Reply #6 |
9. Inacted AND funded. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cant trust em (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-29-09 04:09 PM Response to Reply #9 |
11. Is TARP supposed to be an example of well implemented public policy now? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fumesucker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-29-09 04:12 PM Response to Reply #11 |
13. Not at all.. But it *is* an example of Congress not lollygagging when something is important.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ruby the Liberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-29-09 04:16 PM Response to Reply #11 |
15. No, it is an example of 'where there is a will, there is a way' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kestrel91316 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-29-09 03:52 PM Response to Original message |
8. You'd think the damned thing had been signed into law by all the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cant trust em (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-29-09 04:05 PM Response to Original message |
10. Shouldn't the house have a check in the 2nd question? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ruby the Liberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-29-09 04:18 PM Response to Reply #10 |
16. Both houses have combined the bills, but they are not on the floor yet. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bertman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-29-09 04:15 PM Response to Original message |
14. Thanks, sinkingfeeling. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri May 03rd 2024, 09:47 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC