Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

There is something HORRIBLE in the house bill brought to you courtesy of Rep Anna Eshoo

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Phoebe Loosinhouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-29-09 05:27 PM
Original message
There is something HORRIBLE in the house bill brought to you courtesy of Rep Anna Eshoo
Edited on Thu Oct-29-09 05:28 PM by Phoebe Loosinhouse
Pointed out in Slinkerwink's GREAT Kos diary. Please read the whole thing.


http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2009/10/29/798439/-My-Thoughts-On-The-Public-Option-In-The-House-Bill
My Thoughts On The Public Option In The House Bill
by slinkerwink

skip

The road from here to the President's desk is very long, and we're just at the half-way point right now in getting the best bill possible onto his desk. However, it doesn't mean that we should ignore terrible amendments like the Eshoo amendment that's a major giveaway to pharmaceutical firms. It would ban brand name biologics from ever being available as generics. It means sick people who can't afford brand-name biologics would never be able to get them as generics.

They'd be stuck with an unaffordable biologic medicine to treat their illnesses. It's wrong, and we shouldn't stand for it as a part of the final bill.

We're holding rallies in four different cities, one of them at Rep. Eshoo's office along with the American Medical Student Association, to bring attention to this terrible amendment:

Palo Alto: http://www.facebook.com/...
North Carolina: http://www.facebook.com/...
Baltimore: http://www.facebook.com/...
Washington DC http://www.facebook.com/...


Of course, we'll ask ourselves how anyone pretending to represent their constituents could possibly put something like that in the bill and how could everyone else let her get away with it. And I'm sure we'll come up with the usual answer.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Ardent15 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-29-09 05:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. Eshoo is my Congresswoman...
I can hardly believe it. I used to trust her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KamaAina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-29-09 05:31 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Her district spills over into my agency's service area
thus, I had already planned to meet with her (or at least staff) at some point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dana_b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-29-09 06:29 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. she was mine
until 6 months ago. Now I don't have one (contra costa). I think we're better off than you are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hvn_nbr_2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-29-09 06:55 PM
Response to Reply #1
11. Yes, *usually* she's one of the better ones.
I don't know the exact borders of her district, but I'm guessing that it includes a bunch of Bay Area biotech and other pharmaceutical companies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ardent15 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-29-09 06:58 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. You guessed right
This area may be culturally liberal, but it's "moderate" on economic issues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
imdjh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-29-09 05:29 PM
Response to Original message
2. knr
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phoebe Loosinhouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-29-09 05:33 PM
Response to Original message
4. In case you doubted - there actually was an unrec. Unbelievable. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC_SKP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-29-09 05:35 PM
Response to Original message
5. Fixed Facebook Meetup Links Here:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phoebe Loosinhouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-29-09 05:37 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Thank you! nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pleah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-29-09 05:38 PM
Response to Original message
7. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KamaAina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-29-09 05:41 PM
Response to Original message
8. More from our local paper
mirrored here:

http://www.essentialaction.org/access/index.php?/archives/198-Opinion-Eshoo-Amendment-Will-Give-Too-Much-Protection-To-Biotech.html

As the House Energy and Commerce Committee meets to vote on health care legislation, it is expected to consider an amendment from Reps. Anna Eshoo of Palo Alto, Joe Barton of Texas and Jay Inslee of Washington state — supported by Big Pharma and the biotech industry — to authorize generic competition for biotech drugs. Currently, there is no regulatory process for approval of generic versions of this class of pharmaceuticals, known as biologics.

Biologics make up roughly half of the most important new medicines, including most new cancer drugs, drugs for the treatment of severe arthritis and psoriasis, MS, diabetes, and numerous vaccines.

They are priced significantly higher on average than brand-name conventional drugs. For example, the top-selling biologic Enbrel, Pfizer/Amgen's arthritis treatment, costs $15,000-20,000 per patient per year. Roche/Genentech's cancer drug Avastin costs approximately $185,000 per year.

Biotech's argument that it must charge 22 times more on average for biologics than for conventional drugs because biologics cost more to develop is untrue. Studies frequently cited by the brand-name industry report the cost of producing brand-name conventional drugs is almost identical — $1.2 billion v. $1.3 billion. Brand-name companies charge so much simply because they can.


:grr: :banghead: :argh:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phoebe Loosinhouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-29-09 06:25 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Great link and thank you. Lots of good info. nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seafan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-29-09 08:44 PM
Response to Original message
13. Thanks, Phoebe. Jane Hamsher is on this as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 05:25 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC