Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

So why is M$M ignoring CA-10 election? Because its going to be progressive win?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread		 This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
HipChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-03-09 08:50 PM
Original message
So why is M$M ignoring CA-10 election? Because its going to be progressive win?

when it looks like a progressive will be elected in? Does it not fit into their little referendum on Obama agenda..


http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=102x4131387
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Nikki Stone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-03-09 09:08 PM
Response to Original message
1. K & R
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-03-09 09:09 PM
Response to Original message
2. Ding ding
We have a winner
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LonePirate Donating Member (898 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-03-09 09:13 PM
Response to Original message
3. There is almost no chance of a party flip in the district.
Without high profile endorsements, a competitive race or a party control flip, the media couldn't care less about this race. Plus, the political media centers in NYC and DC can more easily cover races in NY, NJ and VA. Then there's the fact that media organizations refuse to conduct any investigative analysis that would highlight the trendsetting leftward tilt of the election in this district.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-03-09 09:18 PM
Response to Original message
4. Polls don't close for a while yet. They've all committed to
not making comentary or predictions until the poills are closed in the area.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tritsofme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-03-09 09:19 PM
Response to Original message
5. Result in the CA-10 is not surprising.
Edited on Tue Nov-03-09 09:20 PM by tritsofme
Obama carried the NY-23, and likely picked McHugh as Army Secretary with an eye toward taking over the seat.

Lots of drama in NY-23, the outcome in California was known weeks ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmondine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-03-09 09:34 PM
Response to Original message
6. No crazy Alaskan beauty queen endorsements
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 06:55 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC