Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

RNC To Waxman: We’ll Only Show You The Emails We Want You To See

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
deminks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-18-07 06:48 PM
Original message
RNC To Waxman: We’ll Only Show You The Emails We Want You To See
http://thinkprogress.org/2007/04/18/waxman-rnc-search-terms/

In a new letter to the Republican National Committee, House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman Henry Waxman writes that the RNC has provided only minimal information regarding White House officials’ use of RNC e-mail accounts. The purpose of Waxman’s inquiry was in part to determine the extent that White House staff used “non-governmental e-mail accounts to conduct official government business.”

In the new letter, Waxman reveals that the RNC’s response thus far has been to propose that any Congressional requests for emails be filtered through “eight search terms, such as ‘political briefing,’ ‘Hatch Act,’ and ‘2008.’” Waxman notes that these proposed search terms would not have produced the RNC email that transmitted a copy of Karl Rove’s Powerpoint slides that were presented at a General Services Administration meeting. That e-mail read: “Please do not email this out or let people see it. It is a close hold and we’re not supposed to be emailing it around.”

Waxman says that before Congress can agree to the RNC’s proposed “search terms,” the RNC must provide basic information about the extent their email accounts have been used to transact government business:

(link to letter here)

http://oversight.house.gov/story.asp?ID=1256

Smirky, le provocateur.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-18-07 06:50 PM
Response to Original message
1. The RNC is NOT the federal government
Issue subpoenas and send federal marshals to pick up the computers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-18-07 06:55 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Exactly...the games need to be ended now...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-18-07 07:03 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. 'Bout them there marshals...
The United States Marshals Service is based in Arlington, Virginia and, under the authority and direction of the Attorney General, is headed by a Director, who is assisted by a Deputy Director. USMS Headquarters provides command, control and cooperation for the disparate elements of the service.

(Wikipedia)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-18-07 07:04 PM
Response to Original message
4. Hey RNC----WAXMAN will determine the search keywards you duffus!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Na Gael Donating Member (88 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-18-07 07:19 PM
Response to Original message
5. Search terms? How about 'Zipties?"
Who are they to propose...anything? Everytime someone in the RNC coughs up some bullshit offhand quip instead of the information requested, they need to be arrested, ziptied, and thrown in jail, period.

This sounds like a gradeschool game. I'd pay good money to see them try that shit on a hardened criminal in the pen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-18-07 07:29 PM
Response to Original message
6. I've got your 8 search terms
"President Bush"
"Vice President Cheney"
"US Attorneys"
"Karl Rove"
"Kyle Sampson"
"Attorney General Gonzales"
"Patrick Fitzgerald"
"Monica Goodling"

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unlawflcombatnt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-18-07 07:57 PM
Response to Original message
7. The definition of "Total"
At numerous places in Waxman's letter he uses the word "total," and once uses the word "all." Maybe the White House doesn't understand the words "total" or "all."

Maybe they'd better understand the words "contempt" or "obstruction of justice."

The direct link to Waxman's letter is at
http://oversight.house.gov/documents/20070418161112.pdf
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 02:54 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC