Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

3rd Circuit tosses birther claims because they "suffer from fatal defects in their reasoning"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread		 This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-12-09 08:37 PM
Original message
3rd Circuit tosses birther claims because they "suffer from fatal defects in their reasoning"
Edited on Thu Nov-12-09 08:40 PM by usregimechange
Philip Berg, a lawyer acting pro se, filed this action challenging Barack Obama’s eligibility to run for and serve as President of the United States. The District Court dismissed Berg’s action on the grounds that he lacks standing and failed to state a cognizable claim...

Berg’s arguments that the District Court ignored some of his voluminous motions and other pleadings not only suffer from fatal defects in their reasoning, but are irrelevant...

Because there is no case or controversy, we will affirm the District Court’s order dismissing Berg’s action.

http://www.ca3.uscourts.gov/opinarch/084340p.pdf


:rofl: :spank:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-12-09 08:40 PM
Response to Original message
1. Legalese for nuts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-12-09 08:43 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Better appeal to SCOTUS, have them make fun of you next...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-12-09 08:46 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Yeah, no sense in leaving anyone out.
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheCowsCameHome Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-12-09 08:48 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Yup. Those nine love a good laugh, especially Mr. Bushyeyebrows
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-12-09 09:06 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. who dat? Scalia?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheCowsCameHome Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-12-09 09:16 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. That be the one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThoughtCriminal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-12-09 08:48 PM
Response to Original message
5. What happens next is predictable
Charges that the court is part of a conspiracy, followed by fines and then fines for not paying fines.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 11:22 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC