Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama To Announce Increase Of US Troops For Afghanistan On December 1

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-23-09 10:06 PM
Original message
Obama To Announce Increase Of US Troops For Afghanistan On December 1
Source: Huffington Post

President Barack Obama is expected to announce a "sizeable force" increase in US troops for Afghanistan early next week, tentatively December 1, according to a report from NPR.

Obama met with his war council on Monday evening to decide how many troops to send in addition to the 68,000 already deployed. According to the Associated Press, "Military officials and others said they expect Obama to settle on a middle-ground option that would deploy an eventual 32,000 to 35,000 U.S. forces to the 8-year-old conflict." General Stanley McChrystal, the top US commander in the region, had been pressing for 40,000.

After Obama's announcement next Tuesday, General McChrystal, Defense Secretary Robert Gates and Admiral Mike Mullen, chairman of the joint chiefs of staff, are expected to testify on Capitol Hill.

more: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/11/23/obama-to-announce-increas_n_368447.html

Link to NPR report: http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=120725456&sc=nl&cc=brk-20091123-1914
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MichiganVote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-23-09 10:08 PM
Response to Original message
1. Dumb. This is just plain dumb.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SCRUBDASHRUB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-23-09 10:12 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. So much for not leaking...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tom_paine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-23-09 10:13 PM
Response to Original message
3. Now THAT'S change I can believe in!
That, and of course Cheney's Assassin Gen. McChrystal is also change I can believe in.

:rofl: :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-23-09 10:14 PM
Response to Original message
4. middle-ground option
FAIL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EmeraldCityGrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-23-09 10:18 PM
Response to Original message
5. My son's best friend was notified he'll
be shipping out right after the holidays.

What a nightmare this decision will turn out to be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
coalition_unwilling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-23-09 10:19 PM
Response to Original message
6. I worked for and voted for Obama in 2008. I won't be making that
mistake again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
debbierlus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-23-09 10:48 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. We need a 2012 primary challenger for nearly every sitting politician in Washington

These people are not leaders. They are corporate appointees.

Enough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liquid diamond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-23-09 10:55 PM
Response to Reply #6
14. Yes, sit pat my extremists.
You think this is bad? You think Obama is like Bush? At least Obama is focused on an exit strategy. Bush let this mess fester for 8 years and yet you think he and Obama are two peas in a pod? Sit on your asses in 2012, and you will see worse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-23-09 11:06 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. Boogey boogey boogey!
Some people don't only vote for the Party, some people don't vote unless given a reason. Their votes must be earned. And, you can't blame them when your candidate loses because they fail to realize that.

A good candidate will build a winning coalition. If Obama's team calculates that they can afford to lose Liberals, they will be cut loose in an instant. If they can make up any lost Liberals with Independents, they will happily do it. The moderate, centrist path is the easiest to produce accomplishments.

They just better hope that they don't under-estimate the number of Lefties or over-estimate the indys.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liquid diamond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-23-09 11:17 PM
Response to Reply #16
21. More utopian bullshit. Hahaha
So tell me where the fuck you will go in 2012. Are you voting republican because Obama is just like Bush? Will you waste your vote on an idealistic shit head like Kucinich and weaken Obama's chance for reelection? This I have to hear.

Liberals WILL fall in line in 2012 or they run the risk of getting another President Bush. You talk tough NOW because it is the first year of Obama's presidency. But when you are facing the threat of another republican winning the White House, you'll change your tune. Picking a president is choosing between the lesser of two evils whether you like it or not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-23-09 11:23 PM
Response to Reply #21
25. there's no law that says that you have to vote for anybody in any particualr race on the ballot.
i've abstained on plenty of races throughout the years- i refuse to vote for a candidate that i don't support.
and if i can't support obama in 2012, i can't vote for him. so far- he hasn't given me any reason to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-23-09 11:25 PM
Response to Reply #21
26. I wasn't talking about me.
I would never sit out an election, and I would never vote for a repuke nor would I do a thing to help one.

I am talking about electoral politics. The base, the activists, the donors are not going to feel compelled to put their time, effort and resources into something that isn't giving results. Obama is going to have to take some more liberal actions between now and 2011, that all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turborama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-23-09 11:06 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. I agree. That kind of thinking is very dangerous.
I just saw on AC360 that Obama's rating has fallen to 49% and Palins has gone up to 43%

Sarah Palin vs. Barack Obama: The approval gap silently shrinks to a few points

=cut=

Depending, of course, on which recent set of numbers you peruse and how the questions are phrased, 307 days into his allotted 1,461 the 44th president's approval rating among Americans has slid to 49% or 48%, showing no popularity bounce from his many happy trips, foreign and domestic.

Riding the wave of immense publicity and symbiotic media interest over her new book, "Going Rogue," and the accompanying promotional tour, Palin's favorable ratings are now at 43%, according to ABC. That's up from 40% in July.

One poll even gives her a 47% favorable.

Most recent media attention has focused on the 60% who say she's unqualified to become president. Her unfavorable rating is 52%, down from 53%, which still doesn't ignite a lot of optimism for Palin-lovers.

On the other hand, 35 months before the 2008 election, that Illinois senator was such a nobody that no one even thought to ask such a question about him. Things seem to change much more quickly these days.

More: http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/washington/2009/11/not-that-it-matters-politically-because-shes-a-republican-idiot-and-hes-a-democrat-geniusbut-sarah-palins-poll-numbers-are-c.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-23-09 11:18 PM
Response to Reply #14
22. believe me, i won't be sitting on my ass in 2012.
i'll be working for progressive candidates, especially in the democratic presidential primary.

but i don't see how i'd ever be voting for obama, or any dlc dino types that might make it to my ballot in the general election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
debbierlus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-23-09 11:21 PM
Response to Reply #14
23. He is like Bush. This is utter and total stupidity. I am not supporting this phony corporate shill

A second time.

I will work for a primary challenger.

What is going to happen if I sit out?

Will I get a President who will expand Bush's policies and wars?

Will I get a President who will sell health insurance reform that enslaves the American people to big insurance & pharm?

Will I get a President who wants to renew the Patriot act?

Or, a President who appoints the architects of the economic failure to the head financial positions in his administration?

Maybe I will get a President who refuses to stand up for gay equality?

Or, a President who believes the Hyde amendment should stay law?

God, that would be terrible!

Stop defending the indefensible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liquid diamond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-24-09 02:21 AM
Response to Reply #23
30. I bet it always rains in your world doesn't it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
coalition_unwilling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-24-09 11:42 PM
Response to Reply #14
34. Obama's exit strategy for Afghanistan smells remarkably similar
to Bush's exit strategy for Iraq: Escalate the war so as to avoid "losing face" (basically, the Kissinger solution in SE Asia ca. 1969-74). Face it, we've already "lost" in both Iraq and Afghanistan. It's now merely a question of how many more will die before even the most blood-thirsty of the war pigs has had enough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
femmocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-23-09 10:23 PM
Response to Original message
7. Sad.....
:shakes head in disbelief: smilie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nevergiveup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-23-09 10:24 PM
Response to Original message
8. If the source is Huffington Post it must be factual.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-23-09 10:35 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Well, the primary source is NPR.
You can ignore it until the announcement if you want. You would be incredibly naive and poorly informed to deny the escalation is coming.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-23-09 10:44 PM
Response to Original message
10. George W. Bush...Barack Obama...not all that much change.
Thanks for lying to us Barack. Really, you're no better than Bush. You're covering up his crimes, which makes you complicit.

More war. Health care? Eh, toss the little folks a carrot and they'll shut up.

Gay rights? Equality for all? No biggie, you got yours so to hell with everyone else.

No more money, Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
debbierlus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-23-09 10:46 PM
Response to Original message
11. Oh man. I hope this is wrong, but I won't be surprised if it isn't.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-23-09 11:22 PM
Response to Reply #11
24. I'm still hoping this is wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mullard12ax7 Donating Member (500 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-23-09 10:51 PM
Response to Original message
13. Moyer's show was great on Friday, directly compared it to Nam
Has Bill been thrown under the bus yet along with Krugman, Chomsky, women in general and any chance of torturers ever been held accountable?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
debbierlus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-23-09 11:16 PM
Response to Reply #13
20. Didn't catch it - I will go over there and see if the video is up now!

Thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blues90 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-23-09 10:58 PM
Response to Original message
15. What a surprise this is . Go with the corporate interests as always
People mean nothing in anything no matter what. We have no voice we have a damn vote that means nothing at all. We are handed a choice between shit and human waste.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-23-09 11:11 PM
Response to Original message
18. BBC saying 40,000
Boooo!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Individualist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-23-09 11:15 PM
Response to Original message
19. So that's what he meant by "Yes, we can."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-23-09 11:28 PM
Response to Original message
27. is he insisting that any deployment be 'deficit neutral'...?
between this and the crappy healthcare legislation -it's like he's daring people to march on dc.

only because he knows they won't.

not as long as they've got message boards on the internets where they can vent their rage and anger.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-23-09 11:32 PM
Response to Original message
28. ---
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
girl gone mad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-23-09 11:34 PM
Response to Original message
29. Fuck. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-24-09 02:22 AM
Response to Original message
31. Its a chess move, right?
:thumbsdown:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cowcommander Donating Member (679 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-24-09 02:25 AM
Response to Original message
32. This is sad, but not surprising
This was one of the things he and McCain agreed together on. There are no broken promises here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kenny blankenship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-24-09 02:26 AM
Response to Original message
33. Maybe we'll have some announcements of our own
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 01:01 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC