Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Democrats push $150B stock tax per year on Wall Street

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-24-09 04:12 PM
Original message
Democrats push $150B stock tax per year on Wall Street

Democrats push $150B stock tax on Wall Street
By Silla Brush - 11/24/09 12:05 PM ET


A House bill still being drafted aims to raise $150 billion each year to pay for new jobs.

Under a bill being drafted by Democratic Reps. Peter DeFazio (Ore.) and Ed Perlmutter (Colo.), the sale and purchase of financial instruments such as stocks, options, derivatives and futures would face a 0.25 percent tax.

The bill, a copy of which was obtained by The Hill, is titled the “Let Wall Street Pay for the Restoration of Main Street Act of 2009.”

Half of the $150 billion in tax revenue would go toward reducing the deficit, while the other half would be deposited in a “Job Creation Reserve” to support new jobs.

The job fund would be available to offset the additional costs of the 2009 highway bill and other legislation that creates jobs.

The Obama administration and congressional Democrats are looking for ways to create jobs after the nation’s unemployment rate hit 10.2 percent in October and job losses are expected to rise.

more...

http://thehill.com/homenews/house/69295-dems-push-wall-street-150b-stock-tax
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-24-09 04:13 PM
Response to Original message
1. Sounds good
I'm all for more taxes, starting with Wall Street

Call me simple on this issue, I do think the rich owe us. There, I f'n said it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whathehell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-24-09 04:41 PM
Response to Reply #1
11. + 10
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dtotire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-24-09 04:21 PM
Response to Original message
2. It makes sense
I believe that stock trades are taxed in England. It is a small tax, around 1/4% per $1000, or something like that. It adds up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jsamuel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-24-09 04:24 PM
Response to Original message
3. as someone with a mutual fund, I am all for it
0.25%, nothing compared to fees that the managers charge me for the same activity
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romulox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-24-09 04:28 PM
Response to Original message
4. Sounds like a terrible plan. It would've been better not to have handed out TRILLIONS to banksters
in the first place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-24-09 04:29 PM
Response to Original message
5. Sounds like a good start.
Let's reinstate Glass-Steagall while we're at it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nykym Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-24-09 04:30 PM
Response to Original message
6. I have mixed feelings about this approach
Edited on Tue Nov-24-09 04:44 PM by nykym
without some exemptions. Lets say you are 70 1/2 years old and finally ready to retire. You check out your 401K and see you have $100,000.00 in it. you want to take it all out - so you will have to pay taxes on it + the new 25% tax on the stock transfers which amounts to $25,000. Not much left now.

On second thought after my math error was pointed out (I am tired and overworked) Full steam Ahead tax the mother!
Thanks for the correction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
customerserviceguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-24-09 04:34 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. It's not 25%, it's 0.25%
A whole 'nother kettle of fish. Your 70 year old would have to pay $250 tax.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-24-09 04:34 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. That would be a .25% tax, not 25%. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-24-09 04:30 PM
Response to Original message
7. Ok, please tell me how this gets through the Senate?
Just looking at Health Care Reform the past oh 2 months.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
itsrobert Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-24-09 04:35 PM
Response to Original message
10. Bad plan
Many Trading Companies are hurting right now. This will sink them a little further.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 08:35 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC