Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Disappointed in Jon Stewart's interview with Jeremy Scahill on Blackwater.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
soothsayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-19-07 10:27 PM
Original message
Disappointed in Jon Stewart's interview with Jeremy Scahill on Blackwater.
Jon seems really uninformed, almost skeptical as to why this is an issue. Booo, Jon! That sucked from the moment you dropped his book.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-19-07 10:37 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yipes
I bought it recently based on the After Words interview on C-Span. And also Corporate Warriors based on Scahill's suggestion. Reading that one first for a worldwide overview of these soldiers of fortune. It's great with tons of footnotes.

Every once in a while Jon disappoints.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soothsayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-19-07 11:08 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. Yeah. I'm used to him stepping on people's lines during the interviews
(cuz he's jolly and silly and funny and quick) but thank god Jeremy spoke quickly and was able to spit out alot of info before Jon would open his mouth and derail a really interesting tidbit. Color me annoyed with my beloved Jon tonight! grrr!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-19-07 10:39 PM
Response to Original message
2. Uh, isn't there any place for asking questions to get a broad outline?
I mean, for the host to assume that the viewer may not be familiar with the book or Blackwater and needs to learn things from the point of view of someone who has no need of reading the book at all because he/she already knows all the content?

Is there?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soothsayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-19-07 11:01 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. sure, but he seemed dismissive and uninterested. It was very odd.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-19-07 10:40 PM
Response to Original message
3. I thought it was strange. I've never seen him so lackluster and yes,
Edited on Thu Apr-19-07 10:58 PM by higher class
skeptical. He's upbeat with people I can barely suffer. I think Scahill is a hero.

Ah well, we have Amy Goodman. And millions say Amy who? Sad. Best investigating and five days a week. Sometimes I wish Democracy Now broadcasted all day - equal in hours to MSNBC, minus the super dramatic prison and legend prgroams. We need the solid serious reportng well as the comedy.

Hope we hear why Jon performed so weirdly.

I didn't know the issue about the House/Senate Bills not covering mercenaries. Is there anything as scary as a wealthy born-again right wing Republican mercenary?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gatorboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-19-07 10:42 PM
Response to Original message
4. I mentioned this on another thread.
He seemed openly standoffish to the guy for some reason, almost as if he didn't like the guy personally for some reason. I dunno. It was just an odd interview for Jon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peekaloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-19-07 10:48 PM
Response to Original message
5. Today when Amy Goodman asked Scahill to confirm he would be on 'TDS'
tonight Scahill gave a dismissive "that's what I'm told" reply, which was rather weird.

:shrug:

Sounds like neither was too thrilled to be thrown together.






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soothsayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-19-07 11:11 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. Huh. Go figure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WilliamPitt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-19-07 10:50 PM
Response to Original message
6. Do a detailed interview in three minutes.
I'll judge your performance.

I thought it was good. How do you run a detailed interview, at high speed, on an issue most viewers never really knew existed?

You do it like he did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soothsayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-19-07 11:11 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. It wasn't that, it was Jon's demeanor and attitude. Not his usual yellow
lab jumping on the guest's lap and licking their faces (even when it's some evil repuke) and accidentally peeing on their lines because he's so excited; he was indifferent, uninterested, and treated the guy like he was talking to some nut who thought the earth was flat. I guess it was subtle for some to pick up on, but it sure rubbed me the wrong way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WilliamPitt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-19-07 11:51 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. From what post five said,
maybe they don't get along. It happens, even among the good guys.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClusterFreak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-20-07 12:05 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. You got it...
...and it would be nice if people could cut their 99.9-percent-of-the time-hero some slack that other point one percent of the time when he doesn't impress. I've always been irritated by some on DU who are so quick to throw their erstwhile heroes to the wolves, when they drop the ball or underperform in some way once in a very long while.

Give the guy a break, eh? If we were all forced to observe the high standards we set for our heroes all the time, I'd like to see how long most of us would last...including me.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soothsayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-20-07 05:55 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. lol! "Disappointed" was too harsh? Sorry about that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Anwen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-20-07 12:15 AM
Response to Original message
13. I agree! It was odd...
He seemed very off his game. Stewart usually gives such great interviews, too! No matter who the guest, he makes them feel right at home and appears very interested in what they have to say... but this one just felt cold and indifferent, somehow. I thought it was just me. Glad to see I'm not the only one!

Still love Jon, though. :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-20-07 06:03 AM
Response to Original message
15. Agree 100%
I was very disappointed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-20-07 06:45 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. I agree - I was very disappointed.
Edited on Fri Apr-20-07 06:46 PM by Maat
The night before, I had attended a presentation on Erik Prince, Joseph Schmitz and Blackwater. It is quite shocking - the marriage of theocratic views and a dedication to mercenary violent action. Very scary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-20-07 06:51 PM
Response to Original message
17. I thought Jon did fine.
With the limited time frame of the interview in mind, Jon elicited some salient (reads: jaw-dropping) info from Scahill.

I bought the book today; Jon did his job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soothsayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-21-07 03:50 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. great! makes me feel better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 01:19 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC