Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Medicine is still the youngest science

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-19-07 11:01 PM
Original message
Medicine is still the youngest science
even though 24 years have passed since Lewis Thomas wrote his excellent book by that name.

Yes, we can use various scans to peer inside the body to detect abnormality in an organ, we can operate, we can fix broken bones and we can treat bacterial infection.. as long as that specific strain has not developed resistance to antibiotics.

But in most cases we can only treat symptoms that can have different causes.

More so with mental illness. Unless we are going to zombify every person whose behavior deviates from the norm, no one can predict whether a person who writes "bizarre" things, who is a "loner," who even stalks women, can end up killing people. In most cases, such writings can provide a vent to inside rage.. one hopes so, at least.

This is the price that we pay for a free society. There will always be people who go out and kill. It is our society that glorifies solving problems using guns. We don't hear about people grabbing guns and killing other people because they are mad at them in other countries, do we?

I don't have problems with NBC airing those rambling talks; I do with a cadre of psychologists and analysts trying to make sense of these incoherent rambling.

Last, please forgive me, but every time when someone talks about the "biggest" mass murder of 32 people, I have to think of numbers that double and triple this one in Iraq every day.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
soothsayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-19-07 11:34 PM
Response to Original message
1. I respected it more when it was an 'art'. Trying to rush it into 'science'
coupled with a profit motive (ok, prolly more the latter) has ruined it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-20-07 08:16 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. You mean go back when medicine was all about balancing humors and such BS?
I'll take science that you very much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-20-07 11:55 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Except that in many times, this science is not
which is why there is so much confusion about drugs, hormones, and other treatments, as well as what is called alternative medicine.

The reality is that Eastern medicine did nicely before Western came along, with all the certainty that later were proven false.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 11:16 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC