|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Robb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-29-09 08:30 AM Original message |
Poll question: Global warming denial: litmus test? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kaleva (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-29-09 08:49 AM Response to Original message |
1. Can one be a progressive if they have litmus tests for others? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Robb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-29-09 08:52 AM Response to Reply #1 |
2. Oooooo...! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-29-09 09:07 AM Response to Original message |
3. I am really shocked that so far |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kingofalldems (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-29-09 09:12 AM Response to Original message |
4. If you believe it's a hoax you would have to believe that thousands of scientists |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-29-09 09:16 AM Response to Reply #4 |
6. Exactly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alc (649 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-29-09 09:50 AM Response to Reply #4 |
9. or you can believe that about a dozen people |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Doctor. (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-29-09 10:04 AM Response to Reply #9 |
12. Uh, yeah. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
notesdev (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-29-09 09:57 AM Response to Reply #4 |
10. Or maybe just a handful with the rest a political puppet show |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sal Minella (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-29-09 10:24 AM Response to Reply #10 |
15. Whatever you're getting paid, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
20score (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-29-09 07:02 PM Response to Reply #10 |
26. The science is settled. Come up with one peer reviewed study to prove me wrong. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
geek_sabre (619 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-29-09 07:10 PM Response to Reply #26 |
29. a big part of the scandal is that the peer review system is corrupted nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
20score (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-29-09 07:19 PM Response to Reply #29 |
30. Really? Where has the peer reviewed system gone wrong? You'll have to elaborate. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
geek_sabre (619 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-29-09 07:54 PM Response to Reply #30 |
31. for starters |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
certainot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-29-09 08:59 PM Response to Reply #31 |
32. the energy industry has high paid trolls trying to obstruct and sabotage research and i |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
20score (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-29-09 08:59 PM Response to Reply #31 |
33. These is your evidence? Thousands of pilfered emails, not one of them |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-29-09 09:16 AM Response to Original message |
5. No room for nuance? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alc (649 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-29-09 10:34 AM Response to Reply #5 |
17. what if it's real and man made but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kingofalldems (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-29-09 09:20 AM Response to Original message |
7. The people who claim hoax are freepers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WeDidIt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-29-09 09:21 AM Response to Original message |
8. Noi room for hoax believers as progressives |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Robb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-29-09 09:59 AM Response to Reply #8 |
11. Using "progressives" was indeed deliberate. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JVS (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-29-09 10:09 AM Response to Original message |
13. I don't think it's a hoax, but I'd have to hear a person's explanation of a supposed hoax in order.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tjwash (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-29-09 10:12 AM Response to Original message |
14. So we aren't alowed in the club if we don't answer the way we are supposed to? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
endless october (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-29-09 10:30 AM Response to Original message |
16. i don't believe it's a hoax. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
caraher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-29-09 10:58 AM Response to Original message |
18. Can you be gullible and ignorant and still be a progressive? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ichingcarpenter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-29-09 11:00 AM Response to Original message |
19. Stupid Poll.... Can a scientist be a NAZI? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-29-09 11:02 AM Response to Original message |
20. I disagree with your statement that there's no room for nuance |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HughMoran (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-29-09 11:05 AM Response to Original message |
21. This is kind of a "baby", "bathwater" question |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Odin2005 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-29-09 11:28 AM Response to Original message |
22. No, and you are a sucker for Big Oil lies as well. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NecklyTyler (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-29-09 11:28 AM Response to Original message |
23. It is a false choice |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
philly_bob (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-29-09 06:23 PM Response to Original message |
24. Caveat: By 'global warming' I include climate change. /nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sebastian Doyle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-29-09 06:24 PM Response to Original message |
25. Shouldn't this poll have a "global warming deniers are dingbats" option? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
optimator (606 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-29-09 07:06 PM Response to Original message |
27. how about "I don't care" as an option |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
20score (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-29-09 07:08 PM Response to Original message |
28. Too subjective and there are no absolutes. But for the most part, people who reject |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu May 02nd 2024, 07:10 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC