Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

UPDATED: Leahy to introduce antitrust repeal amendment

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-01-09 06:39 PM
Original message
UPDATED: Leahy to introduce antitrust repeal amendment
http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/69961-leahy-to-introduce-antitrust-repeal-amendment


UPDATED: Leahy to introduce antitrust repeal amendment
By Eric Zimmermann - 12/01/09 12:26 PM ET


Sen. Pat Leahy (D-Vt.) will file an amendment to the Senate healthcare bill in order to repeal the insurance industry's antitrust exemption on Tuesday.

The House included a similar repeal in its legislation, and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid has expressed support for it.

But some centrist Democrats oppose the repeal. Sen. Ben Nelson (D-Neb.) has said he's secured an assurance from Reid that the provision will not be included in the final Senate bill.

Leahy framed the proposal as a way to prevent unfair insurance practices.

“This amendment will prohibit the most egregious anticompetitive conduct — price-fixing, bid-rigging and market allocations — conduct that harms consumers, raises healthcare costs, and for which there is no justification," he said.


"Subjecting health and medical malpractice insurance providers to the antitrust laws will enable customers to feel confident that the price they are being quoted is the product of a fair marketplace."

UPDATED: Sen. Joe Lieberman has joined Leahy in calling for a repeal, an interesting move for the Connecticut Independent whose state is home to several insurance firms' headquarters.

“There is no reason that health insurers should be exempt from our federal antitrust laws,” Lieberman said in a statement.


“Anti-competitive conduct that reduces consumer choice and drives up prices is harmful to consumers and should be subject to the full range of federal remedies to end such practices," he added.

The partnership between Leahy and Lieberman is also strange given that Leahy called for Lieberman to lose his chairmanship of the Homeland Security Committee after campaigning for Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) for president in 2008.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-01-09 06:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. Wow...
I'm surprised by Lieberman's involvement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-01-09 07:00 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Me, too! This guy is weird, hard to figure out. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wolfgangmo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-01-09 07:41 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. It's easy to figure out.
Let me translate:

"Insurance dudes, pay me more or I'll fuck you like I fuck everyone. Your choice; wallet or your ass." - Leiberman to lobbyists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-01-09 07:45 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. .....
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-01-09 06:42 PM
Response to Original message
2. Again. This isn't the first time Leahy's introduced this legislation

The question is will Reid sacrifice it- and Leahy- for Nelson, Landrieu, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-01-09 07:03 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Sigh. I wish Reid would go with his gut and do the right thing, but I'm
no politician.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-01-09 07:03 PM
Response to Original message
4. Good news
Rec
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hubert Flottz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-01-09 07:04 PM
Response to Original message
6. Is your child having a problem naming his new pet rat?
How about calling it Ben Nelson or Joe LIEberman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Angry Dragon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-01-09 07:06 PM
Response to Original message
7. I guess I am just an idealist
Why can they not just submit bills and see how everyone votes instead of all the backroom bullshit that Obama said he was going to get rid of??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-01-09 07:08 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. wow. Obama said he was going to change how the Senate works?
it's absolutely absurd to blame this kind of crap on Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Angry Dragon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. He said he was going to make government tranparent
I see little or no change. I see a president afraid to really fight for what he believes. He tries to talk to the ones that disagree with him and that does not seem to be working. He needs to start getting in their faces and force them to state and vote their views so everyone can see where everyone stands. Hard to see where people stand behind closed doors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-01-09 07:24 PM
Response to Original message
9. Deleted sub-thread
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-01-09 07:25 PM
Response to Original message
10. The fuck...
Edited on Tue Dec-01-09 07:25 PM by anonymous171
I'm speechless :wow:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
optimator Donating Member (606 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-01-09 07:45 PM
Response to Original message
12. private Insurance gets a monopoly either way
thanks , senators.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 04:43 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC