Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The real danger for Obama and the Democrats is not people voting Republican

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
n2doc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-13-09 12:17 PM
Original message
The real danger for Obama and the Democrats is not people voting Republican
It is people staying home because they see no point in voting. If voters come to believe that voting for change results in none, then why in the heck would they bother to vote? We already know the Republicans have a high percentage of members who will vote because they know what they are going to get and they LIKE it.

Don't bother with the useless "So McCain would be better" replies. McCain WOULD be better FOR the OTHER SIDE. And so THEY will come out and be motivated next time. What is going to motivate the less-than-dedicated voter to get off of his or her butt and vote for our side next time around if they think nothing has changed? And for the average person, it is not some minor policy issue that is "change" it is WAR, DEFICITS, ECONOMY, and BAILOUTS.

And the MSM is not going to help one bit. Change has to be big, and blazingly obvious. And we have less than 1 year until the 10 midterms.

flame away...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
asdjrocky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-13-09 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. I am on the fence.
And I am not happy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-13-09 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #1
33. Me too. How many times am I going to vote for someone who promises "real change" but
doesn't follow through once elected? Unless Obama turns things around, I may well not vote next time. Why should I - at least I can expect to get fucked by Republicans. This whole Obama presidency has been a total disappointment in my opinion. No more voting for corporate Dems for me, so that likely means I'll stay home in 2012. And before someone starts bitching at me for playing into the Republican's hands let me cut you off with a preemptive - fuck you, I'm free to not vote for someone if I firmly disagree with their actions. Obama lost me with both Afghanistan and for not standing up for TRUE health care reform. Anyone who is informed and honest with themselves can not be happy with this president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salguine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-13-09 08:25 PM
Response to Reply #33
52. You said it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-13-09 10:43 PM
Response to Reply #33
65. We might think in terms of "PLEDGES" -- but obviously . . .
we need a Plan B --

IMO, whatever liberals/progressives do has to be done as a BLOC --

Granted, over time, scattered Democrats moving off, staying home, seeking over avenues

has some impact --

but, I don't think it provides a way to get real "change" in the public's interest--

Obviously, we need IRV voting, as well -- but we're not going to get it from the Democrats.

As long as the Democratic Party's only competition is from the right, they will continue

to move to the RIGHT -- completely encouraged, as well, by the rewards of corporate $$$$$$$$$$$.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 01:06 AM
Response to Reply #65
89. You bring up a good point about Plan B
as in we do need one. I'm hoping one will evolve naturally out of general dissatisfaction with the way the Obama admin, as well as congress are acting - or rather not acting. We up against one hell of a powerful enemy with these mega corporations funding both parties. They have they kind of money to do this where we just plainly do not. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 11:42 PM
Response to Reply #89
146. This has been being discussed -- corporatism -- for decades now . . .
Edited on Mon Dec-14-09 11:51 PM by defendandprotect
In fact, in the early 1900's Teddy Roosevelt was telling us that --

"we have to bar corporations from any participation whatsoever in our elections" --! ! !

Though the information has long been out there . . . either not enough people know --

or not enough people understand it -- but we still don't have a Plan B!!

:eyes:

Selling of government was a huge issue in Watergate --


EDIT: PS: Could it be that it sounds too much like a "conspiracy" to some Americans

and they just don't get it -- though this has ALWAYS existed -- from day one of our

Declaration of Independence????

We were taught quite aggressively in our schools that capitalism and democrdacy were

synonymous!!! What a crock!





:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
begin_within Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-13-09 11:04 PM
Response to Reply #33
73. Thank you
I am also finished with the Democrats, unless they were all like Dennis Kucinich, but they're not. Their hands are tied to corporate money and that's what kills them as effective leaders of change. Clinton ran on "Putting People First" then signed NAFTA and a host of other giveaways to the corporatocracy. Pelosi made history as the first female Speaker of the House, then when war criminals were in the Executive branch, she refused to put impeachement on the table, saying instead "My focus is on re-electing a Democratic majority in the House." Then Obama talks all populist in the 2008 campaign but turns around and caves to the corporate interests again. To hell with all of them. They don't deserve my support or vote. I don't care if they lose to the Republicans because they're not any better than them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberation Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-13-09 11:47 PM
Response to Reply #33
81. Vote a 3rd party if you find one that represents your interests and ideologies
It is time people concentrate more on voting their conscience than whatever justifications they have to go through to triangulate their vote. Since we're getting shafted with either a D or and R (for the most part, with some glaring exceptions). You might as well vote your conscience and help 3rd parties to increase their momentum.

It will not provide an instantaneous change, but at least it helps start the momentum. I am frankly done with having to hold my nose shut when voting because I am done of voting for the lesser of two evils. And if I don't toe in like a good liberal and I give my vote "away" (as if for some reasons the Dems are entitled to my f*cking vote, talk about gall) I am just going to laugh in the face of whatever bully who try to blame me for their own party's blunders because they were to lazy to get my vote the old fashion way: by earning it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoUsername Donating Member (265 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 01:13 AM
Response to Reply #81
92. Spot on.
I didn't vote for Obama in the last election and I have no regrets about my vote. I voted for a third-party candidate. I only wish my candidate had won because then we would have actually known what "change" meant.

"It is better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it."
Eugene V. Debs
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 01:39 AM
Response to Reply #92
94. Great quote by a great man
Eugene V. Debs. Man if only right? Kurt Vonnegut seemed quite the fan as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L0oniX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-13-09 12:23 PM
Response to Original message
2. No. The real danger is Obama and our Dem representatives failure to do the right thing.
Edited on Sun Dec-13-09 12:25 PM by L0oniX
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emanymton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-13-09 08:14 PM
Response to Reply #2
50. GOP Being Old Toast, Does _NOT_ Excuse ...
.

The Democratic Party's failure to LEAD! The absence of opposition is the greatest risk to having the Democratic Party _DOING_ the right thing.

It really is time for the Democratic Party to start doing the right thing for the people. I have been patient but it is time for action.

~@:o?
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goldcanyonaz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-13-09 12:23 PM
Response to Original message
3. I totally agree. Many non voters voted for the first time or the first time in years for Obama.
It seems that many of these people aren't happy with the results.

At least that's what I've learned from reading this forum and a few others.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-13-09 12:23 PM
Response to Original message
4. Are you trying to predict what will happen in 3 years, without knowing
what will happen in the interim? Why are you rushing this?
Me, I'll wait to see what progress is made at least in the next two years before I decide who or how people will vote. Sounds like wasted energy to me otherwise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-13-09 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Would be nice to have the luxury of 3 years. Those pesky midterm elections could cause us some pain
if the Republicans make big gains.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
n2doc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-13-09 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. Exactly. They will then have the "momentum"
And making significant changes will become 10x harder. Does anyone think the "blue dogs" are going to become more supportive of progressive causes if we have smaller majorities? What if the House changes back to R majority?

Maybe Obama will be like Clinton and be able to fight through the RW crap. I haven't been convinced that he wants to do that, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-13-09 10:47 PM
Response to Reply #10
66. Actually, only 20% of voters are identifying as Repug . . . that gives us MOMENTUM . . .
we are certainly NOT using . . . !!!

How anyone could think of voting for a REPUG after 2000 and the last 8 years, I have no clue!

However, as long as the Democratic Party's only competition is from the right, it will continue

to move to the right --

One thing I'm sure of ... we have to keep HOPING that Democrats will do the right thing .. .

but we also need a Plan B --

and liberals/progressives have to decide on what to do together -- and act as a voting BLOC ...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Delver Rootnose Donating Member (33 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 04:11 AM
Response to Reply #66
96. 20% self identifying as Republican...
....but greater that 20% are self identifying as tea-party people. The 20% Republicans are because many don't feel they are conservative enough. You think this is good for the Casper Milquetoast Democratic party. Hah.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-13-09 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #6
13. I realize that, but the OP sounded to me like he/she was referencing
the presidential election specifically with his mention of McCain.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
n2doc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-13-09 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #13
18. Didn't mean to. But every time someone complains around here, the response is
"So, you think McCain would be better?" Which is a non-starter. Obama is President and his decisions have and will affect the US for at least the next 4 years.

What I DON'T want to see is another destruction of the Democratic Party like we saw in 1980. The US can't afford it. And frankly my little thread ain't gonna change things one bit either way. I am just very very frustrated with the leadership we are getting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-13-09 01:19 PM
Response to Reply #13
24. I see. There are 3 years to go for that but I do think losses in the midterms will make it harder
to re-elect the president in 3 years. Passing the President's agenda is difficult now. With stronger Republican numbers in the Congress and Senate, it will get worse. Without the ability to pass his agenda, his chances for re-elections will be diminished. Clinton managed to do it in '96 after the bloodbath in 94 but we were in good economic times and he had to move to the right to gain re-election. Any more to the right, at this point, and I think we're cooked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 10:18 AM
Response to Reply #6
121. We can ALSO use the mid-terms, to elect the most progressive people
possible for Congress, 1/3 of senate races and for all the local races we can manage.

Take a page from the Republican playbook, and fill up the school boards, state commissioners offices, state legislatures with progressives, and the higher offices will follow in ten years.

When things are going wrong, the thing to do is fix it, not throw up your hands and devote your life to World of Warcraft.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chowder66 Donating Member (597 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #121
134. Agreed!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toasterlad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-13-09 11:17 PM
Response to Reply #4
77. Oh, Please. Obama Can't Get Anything Done NOW, With a DEMOCRATIC Congress.
Do you expect him to get anything done during the last two years of his administration when he has to face a REPUBLICAN congress?

Unless there is REAL change in this country within the next YEAR, the Democrats will lose Congress in 2010, and Obama will lose the Presidency in 2012. That's simply the way it is. People are getting tired of being lied to, and they're not going to vote for the people who have been lying to them.

Yes, the Republicans will take Congress in 2010, and the White House in 2012. But it won't be the fault of those refusing to vote again for Obama and his lies. It will be Obama's fault. It will be the cowards in Congress. It will be the people who promised us change when they had absolutely no intention of delivering.

Obama does not deserve a second term, and the Democrats do not deserve control of Congress. They have done nothing with the power they have been given.

Until we start refusing to vote for DINOs, the Democratic party will remain an ineffectual joke.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AusDem Donating Member (219 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 05:58 AM
Response to Reply #77
99. i wouldn't go that far
its all about the Senate. All the key progressive legislation has pretty much gotten through the house in some shape or form (i mean aside from things like single payer, which lets face it, was a mistake on their part not to push, but probably falls in the realm of realism)

the senate is where legislation goes to die, and that's the key issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 07:10 AM
Response to Reply #99
100. Reconciliation.
Bush and the Republicans did it. Why can't the Democrats do it? I can tell you right now why they won't. They won't because they will be held to account by the pharmaceutical and insurance industries. And that is that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salguine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 09:45 AM
Response to Reply #99
114. I'd go that far, and then some.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnneD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #77
120. This is why Texas keeps getting GOP govenors....
The DEM's keep foisting Dinos on us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-13-09 12:28 PM
Response to Original message
5. The other real danger is a lack of excitement.
A lack of volunteers, donations, mobilization support, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kermitt Gribble Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-13-09 12:31 PM
Response to Original message
7. I will never vote a straight 'D' ticket again.
And I will never vote for the 'lesser of 2 evils' again. As for the presidential election, if it were held today, I would vote Green. Obama still has 3 years to earn back my vote, but with the direction his 1st year has taken, I don't see that happening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vssmith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-13-09 09:31 PM
Response to Reply #7
58. I agree with you
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-13-09 10:49 PM
Response to Reply #58
67. Turning voters off and away from the polls is a prime way to move parties to the right ...
After all, it is the liberal/progressive who stays home -- not the right wing --

What we need is Plan B . . . what is it going to be, folks???

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toasterlad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-13-09 11:20 PM
Response to Reply #67
78. Refusing to Vote For DINOs Is the ONLY Way to Reclaim This Party.
Your vote is the only weapon you have. If you keep throwing it away on DINOs, they will NEVER change their ways, and we will never have progress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-13-09 11:42 PM
Response to Reply #78
80. As Michael Moore and Wm. Greider have advocated it . . .
this is a small risk in turning away from DINO's --

while at the same time encouraging more liberal/progressive Dems to run for election

to whom we'd give our support --

The trick is that we have to move on this as a BLOC ... IMO.

We can't just scatter off ...

What they have recommended is targeting the DINO's ...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trekbiker Donating Member (724 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #67
136. Plan B is Kucinich leaving the Dems and
becoming the Independent candidate for Prez. That is about the only thing that would motivate me in 2012. I contributed regularly to the Obama campaign, I really believed his BS. Last week is the LAST time they will ever call me after I got done ripping the poor person on the other end of the line about Afghanistan, HCR, bailouts, wallstreet, big Pharma, big insurance, single payer, etc..

I'm going back to voting my conscience, Green and/or Independent.. maybe the occassional Dem down ticket
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rockymountaindem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-13-09 11:33 PM
Response to Reply #7
79. Didn't we suffer enough between 2001 and 2009 the last time people did that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kermitt Gribble Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #79
135. Maybe we need to suffer more
until everyone wakes up to the fact that both parties are corrupt - then, and only then, will we be able to take our govt back. Hope and voting for the lesser of 2 evils ain't gonna cut it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trekbiker Donating Member (724 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #135
138. exactly...
lets just get it over with once and for all and stop this slow painful death. We need a quick death and then pick up the pieces and start over. The USA has become a giant corporation but its not too big to fail.. maybe it needs to be broken up into smaller pieces. I for one sure as hell would not miss Texas
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rockymountaindem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 11:08 PM
Response to Reply #135
144. Yeah, "politique du pire" has worked so well wherever it's been tried
Oh no, wait, it ends in reactionary disaster. Let's not do that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DutchLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #79
137. Didn't Bush steal the elections? I recall something like that...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
backscatter712 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 08:36 AM
Response to Reply #7
109. After Bush, I will never vote a single R again.
Never. I curse those subhuman fucks unto the seventh generation.

At least the Democrats are only half corrupt...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kermitt Gribble Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #109
140. I would never vote for a republican.
However, I feel like I am without a party now because most Dems are just as bought off as the repubs. The party continues to move right - I'm not moving with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cascadiance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-13-09 12:34 PM
Response to Original message
8. Not only not voting, but many not helping to GOTV that helped last time...

You won't have armies of people getting out the vote, if they believe Obama and the Dems are more servants of corporate America than they are of the people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 08:11 AM
Response to Reply #8
107. EXACTLY. That's what happened in the Virginia Governor's race.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pretty_in_CodePink Donating Member (256 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #8
124. Agreed!
My family and I worked very hard the last two elections for the Dems. I'm not sure I could input that sort of energy again. I really feel screwed. It's the Dems loss too because I am EXTREMELY effective at GOTV.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-13-09 12:36 PM
Response to Original message
9. Still cultivating self-fulfilling prophecies, I see. Why don't you just tell us more about what our
motives should be? I want to be sure not to make a mistake.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
n2doc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-13-09 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Why not ask me that in a year? We shall see who was right. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-13-09 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. At least I will be able to learn from whatever mistakes **I** make rather than shifting
that responsibility to some manipulative S/R demagogue - dogwhistling sock-puppet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-13-09 12:38 PM
Response to Original message
12. You are absolutely correct
and in local elections in 2009 in my area, it was proven to be correct.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-13-09 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
15. What will sink them is allowing the Blue Dogs
to scuttle all hope of meaningful health insurance reform. That's the kitchen table issue most people in this country are facing every day, the fact that the insurance companies are robbing them blind and giving little in return but a song and dance that can easily kill them.

Reid needs to go nuclear and he needs to do it now. He needs to rob the obstructionists of the ability to obstruct things this country needs so desperately along with the 100 or so bills that are languishing in committee because of grandstanding GOPs and Blue Dogs.

Conservatives aren't the majority any more. Conservatives in both parties need some serious potty training.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CrispyQ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-13-09 01:09 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. "Reid needs to go nuclear and he needs to do it now."
:rofl:

Warpy, that cracked me up. I have a pretty vivid imagination, but for the life of me, I can't begin to imagine Reid getting fired up & going nuclear.

Reid's the one covering his eyes in this shot:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 07:15 AM
Response to Reply #19
102. Great toon!
Unfortunately I don't think the entire problem is a lack of spine. I think it is a matter of bribery. As ugly as that sounds it is the reality that we must face.

Why no reconciliation? Bush and the Republicans did it for tax cuts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tonysam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-13-09 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #15
37. Health care won't be the issue; jobs WILL
I don't see Obama doing one damned thing about creating jobs, yet the GOP is bound to make gains because the Dems will be blamed for not doing anything to reverse thirty years of failed economic policies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-13-09 10:53 PM
Response to Reply #37
68. Evidently, the JOBS program will create jobs THRU CORPORATIONS?????
Just heard someone talking about this on C-span ....

In other words, the old corporate scam . . . run the program thru them, they profit

and you end up with "trickle down" jobs!!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-13-09 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
16. Let's replicate NJ across the country. One thing I can say about the GOP is
they sure know how to fuck up. They promised their base a permanent majority and failed big time.

It's a good time for Democrats to show them how it's done. I can dream.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-13-09 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
17. Why (????) don't all of you just make this REAL by posting under your REAL names? AND you need
each one of you, to step up right here and now and put on THE TABLE those issues you are willing to permanently damage or sacrifice, in their order of priority from most expendable to least expendable

So that you can have your little power hungry temper fits.



Come on, right now, put your "money" where your mouths are. Let's make this Real enough that everyone can see what you are actually proposing here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IdaBriggs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #17
141. Some of us *do* post under our real names.
I still don't understand what you are asking me to do, but let me assure you that if Obama doesn't cater to my specific issues (pro-choice being #1 and non-negotiable), I won't support him next term. It is part of the definition of the candidate / party platform, and no nonsensicla "suck it up" rhetoric is going to change my mind.

If it makes you feel better, I won't support the Republican contender either.

(And by the way, so far I am still supporting him for 2010, despite my reservations about *many* of his Bush-Like policies.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-13-09 01:11 PM
Response to Original message
20. PUT YOUR ISSUES ON THE TABLE & let us see if "we" are with "you" or not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-13-09 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. * * * crickets * * * - that's what I thought.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-13-09 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #20
27. He/she did. "WAR, DEFICITS, ECONOMY, and BAILOUTS." - from the OP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-13-09 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #27
29. Starters. Needs detail and prioritization before I can decide.
Edited on Sun Dec-13-09 02:11 PM by patrice
e.g. What if we can get a deal on "bailouts" to get Co-Operatist Investment streams out of "Public"/"Private" money? That would make "bailouts" #1 for me, not War. What's going on now that would relate to whatever would need to happen in order to talk about that?

OTH, if we can prosecute for War Crimes and take War Profiteers down, SOON, that would get precedence over "bailouts" for me.

Economy? Where are people placing Trade Issues in the order of things that need to be addressed?

I can't imagine circumstances under which I would surrender the fight against DOMA and Women's right to choose reproductive services for anything except healthy late term pregnancies. That's right I am NOT! with those who are saying all and any abortions when-the-fuck-ever, under any and all circumstances. I will not help them.

"We" are having none of this sort of discussion and I'm just not willing to toss all of this stuff in the wind for Libertarians, LaRouchies, Teabaggers, and various other ignorant asocial opportunists to grab and make their deals with in whatever the moment allows.

IF substantive progress is possible, that's preferable to "a bunch of birds in the bush" and we don't KNOW what's possible, because we have never been here before.

edited: for verb tense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-13-09 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #20
30. P.S. No Deal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Strathos Donating Member (713 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-13-09 01:16 PM
Response to Original message
22. I can say if things don't change
I will never vote again. Screw these career politicians who work more for themselves and their special interests and the GD X-tians than they do the American people!

This land is not the land of the free and definitely not a land where all men are created equal. This land is capitalism run amuck.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-13-09 01:17 PM
Response to Original message
23. The danger is complacency and nonaction.
Edited on Sun Dec-13-09 01:18 PM by no_hypocrisy
Doing nothing and saying nothing is equivalent to allowing others to set policy that affects your life. I'm talking about paying more money, losing your home, shortened life expectancy, anxiety about your future and your family's future, being monitored and punished when you do decide to rejoin the fight.

A citizen is expected to participate, not become a spectator.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-13-09 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. These dogwhistlers think they can break this thing and then just put their policy/issues (whatever
they are) in place.

I'd say rofl if that weren't sooooooooooooooooooooooo fucking SAD.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MisterP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-13-09 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #23
42. all of which we're getting RIGHT NOW due to Wall Street- and Blue Cross-written policies
"even" if enacted by Dems

we have to push for policy, not praying that the right "team" remains popular enough (I mean, it's the policies that are important: Congressional baseball stats are only what's supposed to pass those policies)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChiciB1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 11:26 AM
Response to Reply #23
127. Well Then "As Citizens" Why Can't We Actually Be On the Receiving End
of what WE THOUGHT WE WERE VOTING FOR?? I KNOW where I live, getting rid of MY representative is probably IMPOSSIBLE! When a person gets elected that has at least 20 lawsuits against him at THE TIME he got elected doesn't give me much HOPE that I have ANY voice! Besides, Democrats rarely, probably NEVER get elected here! I need to check the stats some day, but I haven't had a Democratic Representative that I can remember in all my years of recollection!

Stupid me, even though Obama was NEVER my first choice, I did work hard in the very RED county and took a lot of abuse for it... I don't have that energy or even the will to go through it again! I don't "feel" that CHANGE & HOPE that was spoken over and over and over and over and over and over in hundreds and hundreds and hundreds of speeches!

Do I wake up or do I do THE SAME thing! MAYBE if Democrats can ACTUALLY SEE that they have failed us, even IF it means they lose, horrible as that sounds it could possibly do "something" to make them think twice! My last statement makes me very afraid, but I'm afraid now! I'm worried now, and I have a feeling I've been sucker punched!

Confusion isn't helping either!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trekbiker Donating Member (724 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #23
143. I agree completely
but no more "lesser of two evils" voting for me. I havent missed an election since 1976. I've been a registered Independent the entire time. We need a legitimate 3rd party and I am now going to vote for Independents and/or Greens. Forget the corporate Dems, Clinton(s), Obama's, etc. screw em. The Obama - big Pharma thing sent me over the edge. Also Afghanistan. Hell, Nixon would qualify as a Dem these days!

I say recruit Kucinich to become the next Independent candidate for prez. He is one of the few men of honor in Washington.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
varelse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-13-09 01:23 PM
Response to Original message
26. Even worse is the danger of people staying home *before* the election
And keeping their wallets closed to political donations. The Health Care Reform bill in its current incarnation also stands to alienate Obama's younger voters, which could either keep them home in 2012 or even bring them out for the Republican, if that person is clever enough to promise to work to repeal the mandatory insurance requirements in the legislation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Historic NY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-13-09 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
28. Its the Limbaugh effect...."I want him to fail".....
its a win win for the GOP when Dems stay home. Didn't we just see that in some local elections. Va. & NJ too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-13-09 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #28
32. You should see the piece of work Americans for Prosperity HIRED for our state house district,
because local Democrats treat the party like somekind of social club, all blab and gab and NO GO!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Life Long Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-13-09 02:19 PM
Response to Original message
31. 2016 is a long ways off for people to make a decision about "change".
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-13-09 03:01 PM
Response to Original message
34. Agreed. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-13-09 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
35. Apathy among progressives is a real threat. That is why the Neocons
are praising Obama. They love to foster division among democrats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
readmoreoften Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-13-09 04:50 PM
Response to Reply #35
41. It's not apathy--it's a conscious and passionate decision to return to progressive roots:
like activism and taking to the streets instead of buying the cheap dreams some politician-huckster is selling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salguine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-13-09 08:29 PM
Response to Reply #35
53. It's not apathy. It's born out of anything BUT apathy. Apathy is when you just
Edited on Sun Dec-13-09 08:30 PM by salguine
don't care. What it really is is people who see this ridiculous sham for what it is, and refuse to participate in it any more. But apathy it isn't. They wouldn't be so aggrieved if they didn't care.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mithreal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-13-09 08:34 PM
Response to Reply #35
54. Yeah, that is why they always praise him, right
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quinnox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-13-09 03:30 PM
Response to Original message
36. yup, like me for example
I am so disappointed so far in Obama. The health care reform gets worse and worse every day, and he hasn't been a forceful president like I thought he would be. He seems more interested in being a "compromiser" and pleasing the republicans than the Democratic base of liberals.

Obama and the Democrats in Congress deserve to lose next year if they don't turn things around in a BIG way. And they will lose if they don't start changing their ways quickly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikki Stone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-13-09 03:42 PM
Response to Original message
38. If all voters stayed home, TPTB wouldn't get their rubber stamp from "the people"
And our current "democracy" would be up for question.

Of course, there's the risk that the M$M would lie--Fox would show old footage from a past election--and the electronic machines would show that millions of people voted in districts with small hamlets of about 200 people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lydia Leftcoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-13-09 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
39. The Dems should not be complacent: Look what is happening in the UK
Everyone expects the Conservatives to win this next election, despite all the damage that Margaret Thatcher and John Major did to the British economy.

Why?

Because Labour not only failed to undo Thatcher's policies but added pesky annoyances of their own (overly intrusive "security", etc.), in addition to letting the banks run amuck.

When the voters get angry, watch out.

There are predictions that Labour will come in THIRD in some constituencies, losing out to either the Liberal Democrats (Britain's major third party) or the Scottish National Party (in Scotland, of course).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
readmoreoften Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-13-09 04:48 PM
Response to Original message
40. Hey, I'm voting for one Democrat so far. My congressman. I'm sure I'll vote for other on the local
ticket.

But the national level, nah. I'll vote 3rd party this time. Or vote Kucinich. I'll do it purely as a protest vote. There is no way... and I mean NO WAY I am cosigning and rewarding: the Yoo disaster and the fiasco in Afghanistan, hiding torture photos, and bank bailouts. Even if he sold my gay-ass out, if he still went left on the economy and war machine I would've voted for him again. But, as far as I can tell, either the man is a neoconservative or he's a good man who is too cowardly to be a good president.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sebastian Doyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-13-09 05:05 PM
Response to Original message
43. I can sum it up in one sentence
Those 18 to 30 year olds who put Obama over the top - they aren't happy with a war escalation that could very possibly lead to a draft. (Let's not kid ourselves, it's coming if these ridiculous wars for resources continue. And let's also not kid ourselves that is exactly what they are)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-13-09 05:10 PM
Response to Original message
44. In other words, the the real danger for Obama and the Democrats is...
Obama and the Democrats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-13-09 10:56 PM
Response to Reply #44
69. Obama and the Democrats . . .financed by corporations . . .
That's the key to this whole thing --

We have to get corporations out of our elections --

We have elected officials who are PRE-OWNED and PRE-BRIBED by corporations --

We need a Plan B, folks!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressoid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-13-09 05:51 PM
Response to Original message
45. And a danger for Obama and the Democrats is not acting like Democrats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hootinholler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-13-09 06:58 PM
Response to Original message
46. "It is people staying home because they see no point in voting"
Absofuckinglutely.

-Hoot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissDeeds Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-13-09 08:04 PM
Response to Original message
47. I just hope to see change I can believe in
So far, this isn't it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jwirr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-13-09 08:04 PM
Response to Original message
48. You hit the nail on the head. We have lost so many times because
no one sees the need to vote in the non-presidential elections. And if you add the kind of anger and hopelessness that we are seeing right now then you have people who stay home deliberately. Hopefully President Obama will be able to stop the repugs from obstructing everything he tries and give us some proof that he is trying to build the world we want to see.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-13-09 10:58 PM
Response to Reply #48
70. More people need to be voting by absentee ballot . . that's easy, even in mid-term elections ...
And NJ is moving more and more people to absentee ballots --

The GOP/right wing is trying out a few ideas to combat it -- like suggesting

that your address/mail makes it easy to steal an election!!!

But, they're happy with hackable computers!!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-13-09 08:12 PM
Response to Original message
49. That's true and they better get busy
showing us that there is a difference otherwise many of us will not see the use in voting. :-(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
keitai Donating Member (56 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-13-09 08:15 PM
Response to Original message
51. I think the bigger picture is important here.
Obama is not only up against Blue Dog Democrats and Republicans but an entire system designed to squash change. The U.S. Congressional system from what I can see is pretty bloody cumbersome at best and difficult to pass laws through at the best of times (except when you are the GOP and you just ram them through using rules such as budget reconciliation). Add on top of that millions of lobbyists throwing money around like there is no tomorrow, a mainstream media more interested in the inane than the substantive coupled with a right wing media who goes unchallenged and is even at times given cover by the mainstream media and a cultural divide based on geography, values, history and economics, these are things that can't be defeated/reformed/changed in 11 months. I guess the big issue is whether Obama actually wants to challenge this system or be comfortable as the leader at the top of it (the answer to this is still unclear).
I think lots of people thought as soon as the election was over then the sun would shine again, the birds would sing and all would be right with the world again. Things were always going to be difficult and it was always going to take time to effect change. Don't forget right wing forces have been working since 1968 to set up the society that is now in place in the U.S.A. They sure as hell weren't going to go down without a fight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-13-09 11:00 PM
Response to Reply #51
71. Come on . .. the real problem is that the only competititon for Dems comes from the RIGHT . . .
Edited on Sun Dec-13-09 11:00 PM by defendandprotect
that's guaranteed to move the party and general politics to the RIGHT every time --

and the reward for moving to the RIGHT is more corporate $$$$$$$$$$$$ --- !!!

We need IRV voting --

We need a Plan B --

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
keitai Donating Member (56 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 02:46 AM
Response to Reply #71
95. Spot on.
I don't disagree with you in the slightest. Don't think my reply equates to 'lay off Obama' at all. Lefties in the U.S. really need to keep the heat on Obama in every way shape and form. I just feel that this cry of 'Obama promised me change and it hasn't come as quickly as I would like so I am not turning out in 2010.' is way too premature and bluntly, defeatist as it should be the activists' (i.e. the people who populate this site) job to keep the heat on him. (Not that you said that, but I hear words to that effect a lot around this neck of the woods these days).
The situation you described has been spawned by what I said in my original post and it took the Right years to achieve that state of affairs and they stepped on and tore many people down to get there (not to mention suffering a few setbacks themselves). To think that because Obama came in with a sparkling majority and a landslide election victory and that the Republicans would lay down like dying dogs is pretty naive.
I guess the difference of what I think and the approach of the White House is that I think the Dems should fight the G.O.P. on all issues of substance while the approach from the White House is be conciliatory first (i.e during health care, the Dems took single payer off the table straight away so as not to offend the knuckle draggers who would scream socialism). They won't win all battles and it will take time but fighting is the first step (this is where activists come in). Whether they want to fight or not is vague at the moment. It's up to the troops on the ground to want to make them fight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 12:52 AM
Response to Reply #51
86. Bush and co/ had no problem shoving their shit down our throats..none at all!
and the Dem's have a majority in both parties ..and the powder is still fucking drying!

I refuse to vote if FISA is still standing like it is now, and if the Nuremberg Protocols are still being fucked with By this administrations DOJ..If no one from the previous administration is not held accountable for war crimes ( because they committed in cold blood war crimes!) ..I will not vote if this war in Afghanistan is accelerated, if Gitmo is still open, and if we continue as we are right now to rendition people to other countries for torture,.
I want the torture tapes released, and I want my nation to go back to what it was predicated on..the RULE OF LAW!

I WANT THE DEALS OBAMA STRUCK WITH BIG PHARMA AND THE INSURANCE CORPS EXPOSED TO THE FULLEST..IT IS OUR HEALTH CARE THAT HE has made deals on.. THAT I WILL NOT TOLERATE..NOT FOR ME OR MY FAMILY'S HEALTH CARE!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ima_sinnic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 04:34 AM
Response to Reply #86
98. +++1 spot-on as usual, flyarm--I can't improve on that righteous rant
:banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
placton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-13-09 08:56 PM
Response to Original message
55. For over 45 years
I voted -- wont vote the partisan ticket in '10 and '12, others should do likewise
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Truth2Tell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-13-09 09:09 PM
Response to Original message
56. Change has to be big, and blazingly obvious
Bingo! K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DRoseDARs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-13-09 09:28 PM
Response to Original message
57. People pinned underneath busses tend not to be in the voting mood...
...or political donating mood either for that matter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-13-09 11:02 PM
Response to Reply #57
72. More should sign up for Absentee Ballots . . . I understand what you are saying . ..
but even in a time of great stress, it's easy to do --

It might improve off-year elections -- the GOP certainly comes out to vote!!

Money is another question . . .

I certainly NEVER give $$ to anything but a specific candidate I'm certain of --

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dflprincess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-13-09 09:36 PM
Response to Original message
59. It's not just the "less-than-dedicated" voter
there's many of us who have been active in the party for years who are beginning to wonder why we've bothered.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-13-09 11:04 PM
Response to Reply #59
74. Many of us have been asking that for 20 years . . . HOWEVER . . .
we need a Plan B --

and if there is to be any Plan B . . . it has to be carried out TOGETHER --

not by stragglers moving off singly --

We can keep HOPING that the Democrats will respond to more populist ideas -- ending war, for

instance --

but we need a Plan B --


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Unca Jim Donating Member (405 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-13-09 09:43 PM
Response to Original message
60. Well...
I'd agree we might see less turnout in the 2010 elections because of dissatisfaction among the base and a lack of candidates to get excited about.

Still, what's going to be motivating the righties more than the lefties in this election cycle? What issues are those candidates going to run on and win?

Obama, although a pariah to many *on this, tiny, tiny little sample of all voters* is still well-liked and will be trusted far more than whichever idiot the Republicans run in 2012 unless he utterly blows everything.

...Cue comments of "He already has blown everything in 11 months!" which I would counter with: He has helped improve things that are important to many people already. You can search Google and look into some of those things.


I understand many people (including myself) are disappointed in Obama's Presidency so far, but we are paying much closer attention than most people. Average folks seem to be feeling like things are getting better, and the Republicans only say no, no, no.

We'll see where it all leads.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unkachuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-13-09 09:55 PM
Response to Original message
61. "If...
...voters come to believe that voting for change results in none, then why in the heck would they bother to vote?"

....I believe you have discovered the most successful losing formula that corporate Dems will rely upon in 2010....for to lose on behalf of the corporate agenda, means you win....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newtothegame Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-13-09 10:04 PM
Response to Original message
62. I see change. Didn't you notice all the collector's plates and t-shirts????
Edited on Sun Dec-13-09 10:04 PM by newtothegame
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabbycat31 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-13-09 10:07 PM
Response to Original message
63. We dealt with that this year
and it really showed me what voter apathy can lead to (Karl Rove protege anyone?)

We need foot soldiers on the ground for every race up and down the ticket, and people need to get out and vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-13-09 10:33 PM
Response to Original message
64. Over decades now our elections have been so corrupted as to keep voters home . . .
Edited on Sun Dec-13-09 10:38 PM by defendandprotect
the GOP is quite fond of doing it just that way --

That's why the debates say so little about anything -- especially populist ideas --

It is those populist ideas which bring out voters --

It's also why we should see more defense of ACORN among Democrats -- they turned off

the community action a long time ago and have never gone back.

Not smart for encouraging Democratic voters -- but it works for the right wing/corporations.

What the right wing has been doing over the last decades has worked for them --

fascism is crossing our threshold and -- while we can all continue to HOPE -- I don't see

the Democratic Party doing much about changing anything to do with elections.

We need to take back the power from corporate-media to PREDICT and CALL elections for

candidates and by STATE electoral vote PREDICTIONS AND CALLS --

We saw the damage Fox/Ellis did with that power in 2000 --

And this has been going on since the large computers came in during the mid-1960's ...

We also need to rid ourselves of the sham of computer voting -- !!

Germany has declared these computers "Un-Constitutional" and barred them -- !!!

Also throw in IRV voting there and you'll quickly see the Democratic Party returning to

it's human-based ideals --

As long as the only threat to the Democratic Party is from the right . . . the Democratic

Party will continue to move to the right -- also largely encouraged by the rewards of

corporate $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ --


EDITING TO ADD THIS PS: I don't know if there ever was a Nixon "Southern Strategy" or

whether we are just talking about computer steals and corporate-media taking off at that

time???

However, the large computers used by corporate-media and the individual voting computers

began to come in during the mid-late 1960's --

And, coincidentally, that was just about the time America was passing The Voting Rights Act--!!



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sheldon Donating Member (197 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-13-09 11:06 PM
Response to Original message
75. Change takes time... things wont turn around overnight.
At least we're headed in a better direction now, we just need to keep the pressure on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-13-09 11:17 PM
Response to Original message
76. Ooooh! Ooooh! I know the answer!
Since we want "change", we should call our Congressmen because Obama said he couldn't do it alone - that he would need the help of each and every one of us!

And next Summer, each and every Democrat should be out working for their Congresspeople - oh, and sending them the money they need to fight the corporate funded Republicans who would kill Granny for a vote!

What do I get for getting the correct answers?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-13-09 11:59 PM
Response to Original message
82. No change?...Here is a list of accomplishments:
*WARS fully funded and EXPANDING. Bill sent to our children…...Mission Accomplished !

*Trillion Dollars given to friends and campaign contributors on Wall Street. No Strings Attached...Mission Accomplished!

*Military Spending INCREASED....Mission Accomplished!

*Trillion+ Dollars given to the Health Insurance Industry. Token, easily avoidable, symbolic only strings attached....Mission almost Accomplished!

*Kill the possibility for a REAL "Public Option" or REAL Universal Health Care for at least another generation, and begin the “Entitlement Reform” defunding of Medicare (-$500 Billion)....Mission almost Accomplished!

*Block any real re-regulation of BIG BANKS and Credit Cards....Mission Accomplished!

*Protect the Bush War Criminals and Torturers from JUSTICE....Mission Accomplished.

*The Democratic Wing of the Democratic Party SHUT OUT of the Obama Administration…...Mission Accomplished!

*Reinforce the worst Police State provisions of the Patriot Act....Mission Accomplished!

*Protect the very richest. Tell the Working Class that they CAN will be forced to compete with 3rd World Slave Labor.....Mission Accomplished!

*EFCA (Employee Free Choice Act) killed in the crib....Mission Accomplished!

*More Anti-LABOR "Free Trade"....Mission almost Accomplished!

*Jobless Recovery....Mission Accomplished

*The next generation buried under such a debt burden that they will never be able to afford any social or economic programs that will benefit their Working Class....Mission Accomplished.

And ALL this in only ten short months!
What did you want...a pony?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xicano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 12:09 AM
Response to Original message
83. Michael Moore sums it up correctly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 12:28 AM
Response to Original message
84. that's always the problem with off year elections
the two groups that stay home the most are minorities and the 18-25 year old demographic, which also happen to be the groups which won Obama the White House.

If enough of the disgruntled left also stays home, the Democrats could be in big trouble.

------

I know that my enthusiasm for 2010 is at a low point. The performance of my two Senators has been pathetic. Udall has gone from a liberal member of the House to a bluedog in the Senate, and the appointee, Bennett, is a wholly owned subsidy of Wall Street. I can't say that I will vote for Bennett if he manages to buy the nomination. I certainly feel manipulated by the state Democratic party, to the point where I no longer feel any allegiance to it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 01:11 AM
Response to Reply #84
91. Absentee Voting was really moving here in NJ with Crozine . . .
very helpful in keeping voters in the system in off-years --

and I imagine that Christie and right wing are warming up a campaign to

attack it as "encouraging" vote stealing!!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Capn Sunshine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 12:49 AM
Response to Original message
85. Karl Rove's mentor once said that the goal for the R's is to suppress Dem Turnout
because in low turnout contests, Republicans win.

So if you think that we'd be better off with more republicans in congress you're doing it right.

It's quite simple really.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 01:10 AM
Response to Reply #85
90. You're so right . . . and it's this kind of frustration with Dems which will send
Edited on Mon Dec-14-09 01:10 AM by defendandprotect
liberal and progressives home --

We have to have a plan B -- and get everyone acting together --

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skelly Donating Member (136 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 12:55 AM
Response to Original message
87. WOW!
I agree! 100 percent. So, what do we do now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Goldstein1984 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 01:27 AM
Response to Reply #87
93. We unite for one final issue:
Legalization of marijuana.

Then we all plant nice gardens, sit on the porch enjoying the harvest, and let the world happen.

Honestly, I don't know. The only change I believe in is that things are just going to get worse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 01:05 AM
Response to Original message
88. That is it in a nutshell, n2doc.
I, who for years, was somewhat obsessed about politics, am losing interest. I will probably vote, but at this point, I'm really no sure why or what for.

Obama is breaking one promise after the other. Oh, he is keeping his promise to fight more effectively in Afghanistan. But, other than that and the Lilly Ledbetter bill, what is he accomplishing. I like the way he seems to be handling foreign policy, but I haven't seen any serious results from that yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hardrada Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 04:26 AM
Response to Reply #88
97. I don't like that either. He pissed off the Norwegian people
and snubbed their king by skipping a lot of events in Oslo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Butch350 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 07:15 AM
Response to Original message
101. Well? Heard your gripe? What's your solution?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 07:27 AM
Response to Original message
103. Many who voted for the first time last time won't more than likely in 2010.
Edited on Mon Dec-14-09 07:29 AM by mmonk
So it will depend on the base the party relies on and how motivated they will be. It doesn't look good from any direction one wants to look. And all this while the American people rejected business as usual in the last election. The party needs to dump those that advise it if it is to turn things around. K and C Street are destroying the party much as it destroyed the Republican Party last go around.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemReadingDU Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 07:46 AM
Response to Original message
104. vote Democratic to keep out Republicans

It isn't exactly voting for change anymore, it's voting Democratic so people like Palin don't get in office.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aleric Donating Member (278 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 07:52 AM
Response to Original message
105. You're right. Suck it up Dems.
Edited on Mon Dec-14-09 07:54 AM by Aleric
You've lost already. Why do I say 'you' instead of 'we'? Because I've given up on you. You have lied to me and abused me for the last time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 08:07 AM
Response to Original message
106. For those who don't believe it, Virginia was the demonstration of that VERY real danger.
Edited on Mon Dec-14-09 08:09 AM by leveymg
Obama won by 53 percent in a very Purple state. One year later, Craig Deeds, the Blue Dog candidate for Governor, lost 60/40. The difference was that 700,000 Democrats simply didn't turn out, and all the Republicans did.

Why? Deeds was so far to the Right that he said he'd Opt Out of a national health plan if it contained a PO.

Not much enthusiasm among the Party activists for that one. This will happen again, and again, if the Democratic Party continues to court a mythical cross-over Center and corporate money at the expense of the Progressive Base they still have.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BobRossi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 08:35 AM
Response to Original message
108. I should have followed my gut feeling last election.
I will next election. I was right about Obama, he is too inexperienced.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
backscatter712 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 08:39 AM
Response to Original message
110. I, for one, will be participating in primaries.
Michael Bennet's getting challenged by Andrew Romanoff, and I fully intend on doing my part to make the winner of that primary earn his seat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 09:04 AM
Response to Original message
111. Staying home is a default Republican vote
there is no excuse for allowing the GOP to make gains. I don't care what kind of tantrum is being thrown.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeSwiss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 09:04 AM
Response to Original message
112. You said it.
- And don't even get me started.

K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 09:37 AM
Response to Original message
113. the "mccane would be better" reply to any posts against Obama is the new...
"nice post, hitler".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 09:54 AM
Response to Original message
115. Yes, there needs to be a coordinated expression of progressive sentiment
in the upcoming elections. If everyone just stays home, they leave it up to the media spinmeisters to tell whatever story they want, and that story will be about Obama being too LIBERAL for Democrats, causing them to stay home.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
groundloop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 09:54 AM
Response to Original message
116. I don'e exactly see it this way - I WILL vote, for the party that is closest to my values
I've seen enough elections in my lifetime to know that no matter which candidate or party wins, they'll not give me 100% of what I want. After you realize that simple fact it comes down to which party or candidate will come closest to working for my values. The answer to that question is a no-brainer. And if, as the OP said, if enough dems stay home then the party which is farthest away from our values wins and we've all seen where that takes the country.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
swilton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 10:04 AM
Response to Original message
117. Unlike the Democrots
The Republicons never threw their base under the bus - this phenomenon started with the Goldwater election. Although Goldwater lost, the Republicons energized their base - as wacky and laughable as it has been at times- and have at a minimum given it lip service since then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Le Taz Hot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 10:07 AM
Response to Original message
118. A lot of disenchanted people will not be staying home.
They just won't automatically be voting for the "D" just because he/she has that particular letter next to his/her name. I think the Democrats are in a LOT of trouble and third parties will be reaping the benefits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwentyFive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 10:11 AM
Response to Original message
119. Devils advocate: Change comes....s l o w l y,
I believe that Obama gets it.

The problem is....he must get a reactionary congress to go along with him. And, many members must face loud and angry voices that DID NOT vote for change...some of whom represent a majority in their districts.

Remember what happened to Clinton? He came into office, and starting enacting the change people voted for. End military prosecution of gays, small tax increases on the rich, health security, etc. Does anybody remember the telephone lines into the capital going down?? Members of his own party became his worst enemies. Remember Sam Nunn dragging him through the dirt? And that is just the Dems....Jesse Helms recommended Clinton stay away from North Carolina, as his safety would be in question.

So...I plan to keep the faith. Change is measured in years, not days or months.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noiretextatique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #119
130. change doesn't necessarily come slowly
natural disasters, for example, have to be responded to immediately, although that didn't happen immediately. there was nothing slow about our "change" in iraq either. change doesn't have to be incremental or slow. if dems quit dicking around, we could have a healh care reform bill NOW.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MARSHALOTIS Donating Member (15 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 10:20 AM
Response to Original message
122. STRANGER/DANGER
IT IS STRANGE TO HEAR THE SAME PEOPLE WHO VOTED FOR THE AUDACITY OF CHANGE AND HOPE, NOW TRASHING THE PERSON WE ELECTED BECAUSE IT ISN'T FAST, EASY OR SUITS OUR PERSONAL NEEDS AND EXPECTATIONS. WE DIDN'T ELECT SUPERMAN, WE ELECTED A MAN. FROM WHERE I STAND, WHITE, FEMALE, RETIRED "SENIOR" CITIZEN (THEY TELL ME), ON A VERY TIGHT FIXED INCOME, HE SEEMS THE MOST INTELLIGENT, HARDEST WORKING PRESIDENT THAT I CAN EVER REMEMBER. THIS FROM A FORMER REPUBLICAN WHO VOTED NOT ONCE, BUT TWICE, FOR W. FORGIVE ME. HE HAS HAD ABSOLUTELY NO BACKING FROM THE REPUBLICAN PARTY, WHICH STILL WANTS WALL STREET TO REMAIN UNREGULATED, WHO ON THE ONE HAND DO NOT WANT THE GOVERNMENT TO IMPOSE FINES OR ANY LEGAL RAMIFICATIONS FOR THE "TOO BIG TO FAIL" FAILURES, BUT HAVE SCREAMED LONG AND LOUD ABOUT THE PRESIDENT NOT DOING ENOUGH TO CURB WALL STREET! AND STILL NO ONE SAYS, WAIT A MINUTE, THEY'RE TALKING OUT OF BOTH SIDES OF THEIR MOUTHS! THE REPUBLICANS HAVE BECOME MASTERS OF BAIT AND SWITCH, ON A POLITICAL, RAMP UP THE OPPOSITION LEVEL. THEY HAVE SPENT THEIR TIME DOING NOTHING CONSTRUCTIVE,AND ARE BEING PAID HANDSOMELY TO CONTINUE BY BIG BUSINESS, AND US! IF YOU WANT CHANGE, GET BEHIND THE MAN YOU VOTED INTO OFFICE. THERE ARE NO MIRACLES, IT TAKES TIME,HE'S WORKING AND HE'S MAKING PROGRESS HOWEVER SLOWLY YOU MAY FEEL, FOR US.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theFrankFactor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
123. It's Like a Band-Aid on a Massive Head Wound But We MUST Do it!
Edited on Mon Dec-14-09 10:29 AM by theFrankFactor
I see it as trying to stop the bleeding, a vote to the right just increases the bleeding. A vote left slows it by a bit but a bit is better than nothing!

The real work must be done HERE AND NOW!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
inchhigh Donating Member (182 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 11:05 AM
Response to Original message
125. A Matter of Trust?
You know, I disagree with almost every prominent Republican position but I sometimes find myself almost hoping they will get back in power again just because at least then I will know what the rules are. I will hate them and think they are unfair but at least I will know them.

I trust the Republican to do what they say they are going to do. They stand for the things they say they stand for. When * was in office I could point fingers and say, "Man, look how puke philosophy has messed things up".

Now those same philosophies are still messing things up but the Dems are getting the blame for it.

And as for eight years under Gore would have been any different..... Who would our VP have been if Gore had won?

Somehow I think the VP would have been running the country no matter who won.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChiciB1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
126. Not FLAME Here, But I Regrettably Must Say That I Too Am On The Fence!
I really DON'T want to feel this, honestly DON'T, however I'm not feeling comfortable with what I'm seeing.

Yes, there are "arguments" that could be make, or rather certain catch phrases such as... "better than McPalin" or "give them more time" and other such words spoken here as a way to keep the "wavering" still on board! While I realize Obama et al did inherit a LOT OF CRAP, which most of us know is true, I'm not seeing work toward THAT CHANGE!

What it will take to reign me back in will be some REAL CHANGE and not the "fiddling" around the edges. People are hurting and more WAR IS NOT something I can support! I've thought long and hard about ways I can support this escalation in Afghanistan, but in the end I really DON'T believe it's going to be as simple as it's being touted. My FEAR is that it's going to be MUCH LONGER and BLOODIER than we expect. Having lived through Viet Nam, and I DO realize this IS NOT Viet Nam, I don't have much faith in THE MILITARY INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX!

That Obama has lent his ear to these people disturbs me greatly, especially when I see so much suffering here in this country with people going without food or even homes! I work locally to help where I can, but the problem is growing bigger for the less fortunate and there just doesn't seem to be enough people or resources to "cover" the problem effectively! I also hurt for the soldiers and their families who are being required to fight the fight, come back home, only to return to fight again!

And then there's ALL THE KILLING of the innocent people who most certainly are killed simply because the happen to live in countries that have corrupt, evil leaders! I have little faith that "we" can actually turn those countries around. It just seems a waste of money that only seems to pad the pockets of those who profit from WAR!

That's just one of my MAIN reasons for my feelings, but a big one. HCR seems so watered down and I fear we really don't know what the "fine print" will look like! There IS more, but these two have made me think we aren't getting the representation we THOUGHT we would!

As with many of you here, I worked very hard to get Obama and Democrats elected and I'm feeling I got cheated. While locally, Democrats rarely win... almost NEVER, I did try to contribute to candidates in other states. I won't be doing that again! Giving my money away isn't something I'm able to do because of the economy and I feel a need to "save" what I can because the future looks bleak! Another reason is because I don't see what good my money really did!

And for those of you who think this isn't "real" please take the blinders off! I can only WISH that I see a turn around, but that HOPE has evaporated for me! That I'm wrong will be a welcome outcome!

JMHO!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SweepPicker Donating Member (147 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
128. How True
I am a member of a party of cowards that are in the pockets of major corporations as much as the Republicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
avaistheone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
129. In retrospect, I realize my vote for Obama was a vote for the republicans.
I don't think Obama will ever get a vote from me again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sui generis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 12:01 PM
Response to Original message
131. I'll vote for the other democrat if necessary.
We'll see what the midterm report card looks like, but right now Mr. Obama needs to be put on an improvement plan if he intends to pass.

Clearly if he were on fire with us, this division would not exist and we would all be a lot more comfortable about ceding him some more time to get things done. It's not the "time" part that's the issue though, it's the things he's getting done . . . for the eternally appeased "other side" that are causing some of us to pull up and say WTF.

You have gay Americans who are subject to states rights in their marriage choices while black Americans and babtists get federal protection.

You have DADT STILL A FUCKING ISSUE!!!!! WTF?

You have a voluntary filing by the DOJ taking a stance in favor of covering up and dismissing prosecution (and liability) for condoning torture.

We have "health care" reform that is a trillion dollar gimme to the insurance industry with no guarantee of health care at all.

Damn straight we should be worried about voting for this again. Incremental change is nearly as useless as no change at all. Incremental change is certainly NOT the result of incisive leadership.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 12:14 PM
Response to Original message
132. Our only hope for 2010 is the teabaggers splitting the Republican vote.
It's very discouraging. My enthusiasm is kaput and my wallet is closed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DutchLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
133. Voting hasn't mattered in the US since 1992...
At least with Mondale or Dukakis (against the devil... I mean, Reagan) there was something to choose. Not so much anymore since the DLC took over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ballantine Donating Member (7 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 12:37 PM
Response to Original message
139. I wouldn't be too worried about the Republican base anymore
Really, I wouldn't be worried about the Republican base, they're completely fractionated. Whatever database Tom Delay had going back in '00 and '04, is completely useless now. The base has left the party in droves. Out where my bass player lives in Burbank, the Republican Party southern california headquarters is now one tiny little office in the back of a dilapidated shopping center, you wouldn't even know it was there unless you knew where to look. About 15% of the Republicans jumped ship to various minor parties, like the Constitution Party, the Conservative Party, even the Libertarians. Meanwhile the righty wingnut-fruitcakes are still trying to rally the base, ha ha ha. So, as long as liberals don't fractionate too, there's nothing to worry about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
showpan Donating Member (114 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 01:28 PM
Response to Original message
142. Forget the midterms
The neocons have taken over the dems house too...period. Anyone who can't see this has their beer goggles on. We so need a plan B because it's not going to happen through our corporate media rigged elections. Nor is it going to happen by writing our respective elected leaders who hired drones to send us back an irrelevant response.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
704wipes Donating Member (966 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 11:11 PM
Response to Original message
145. screw it I am voting R
No illusions as to what I get from an R.
Schmarmy smiling faced dems are giving me the same thing right now.
They can go home and figure out their own healthcare like I have to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
and-justice-for-all Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 11:44 PM
Response to Original message
147. I will not vote repuke no matter what, I will go Indy or other...nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kaleva Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-15-09 12:03 AM
Response to Original message
148. Very few liberals will lose their seats next year.
The Republicans will make their gains in the battleground districts and states. Areas where people think Obama and Dems in general are too liberal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 01:27 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC