Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is there going to be anything left in the HCR bill worth voting on/for?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
MUAD_DIB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 09:08 PM
Original message
Is there going to be anything left in the HCR bill worth voting on/for?

If the Dems cave to Lieberman on medicare, and there is no public option, then what will be left in the bill?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 09:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. Nope
It's over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 09:10 PM
Response to Original message
2. well fining people without ins. could bring in some revenue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rwheeler31 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 09:10 PM
Response to Original message
3. Yes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 09:10 PM
Response to Original message
4. Yes.
A last second pony amendment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 09:11 PM
Response to Original message
5. Yes. Many things.
No preexisting conditions, no unequal premiums for women, no dropping the sick, no limits on payouts, no skimming off the top, and on, and on, and on...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 09:13 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. No preexisting conditions etc, = increase in rates.
Especially when they remove the requirement that 90% be paid out. Its a giveaway to the insurance companies.

When rates start to go up even worse, everyone will realize what a disservice this bill did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
derby378 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 09:13 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. I think there are now annual limits on payouts in the Senate bill
Someone please show me the link if I'm wrong...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quinnox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 09:11 PM
Response to Original message
6. Everyone has to buy health insurance
Edited on Mon Dec-14-09 09:12 PM by quinnox
and there might be some provision that pre-existing conditions can't be used as an excuse to deny coverage, but even that might be in doubt.

So no, not much worth saving. It looks like a good bill for the republicans to run on and use against Democrats and win heavily next year however.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalpragmatist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 09:12 PM
Response to Original message
7. Medicaid expansion, subsidies, banning rescission and pre-existing conditions
This ends up as an incremental reform effort, which is unbelievably disappointing, given our majorities.

But I would ask the "kill the bill" folks if they'd be happy with the fact that killing it now would mean more than 30+ million people (about half of them on Medicaid) NOT get insurance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeatleBoot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 09:14 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. Thank you.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 09:16 PM
Response to Reply #7
14. Those people aren't getting insurance for free.
I bet in these tough times they simply won't be able to afford it. I doubt there will be 30 million extra covered. Expanding healthcare through expensive medical insurance isn't going to work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalpragmatist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 10:04 PM
Response to Reply #14
21. The bulk are getting it through Medicaid
And the rest receive subsidies and group rates. Still expensive, but drastically less than the individual market right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 10:10 PM
Response to Reply #21
24. "Still expensive"...
Exactly.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 09:21 PM
Response to Reply #7
17. Okay, pass a bill to expand Medicaid. As it is shaping up now the insurance companies may be forced
to sell a policy to people with preexisting conditions but there is the possibility they may be allowed to deny coverage for said preexisting condition.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalpragmatist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 10:05 PM
Response to Reply #17
22. Problem is without the rest of the bill Medicaid expansion unravels
If you expand Medicaid eligibility but do it without an employer mandate, then rather than really denting the number of uninsured, Medicaid expansion just shifts a bunch of people from employer-based plans onto Medicaid. Which also further strains state budgets, since they're now on the hook for covering people's health care.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 10:26 PM
Response to Reply #22
26. Most people who qualify for Medicaid do not have jobs which offer benefits
Walmart employees are, in many states, the largest group on the Medicaid roles. Use a corporate tax or a tax on the upper percentiles. Expand Medicaid and dump the rest of this bill. Here are the people who will benefit from the current legislation:

1) Those with preexisting conditions who can well afford the premiums but are denied due to preexisting.
2) Those people who are at 101-133% of FPL. Those at 100% already get Medicaid

Those are the only people I see benefitting. The rest, even those who qualify for subsidies are going to find the premiums a burden. And that's as it stands now. GOK what more we will compromise away due to the tyranny of Lieberman by the end of the week.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liskddksil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 09:14 PM
Response to Original message
10. No
but 2010 and 2012 is going to be a lot of fun...for the Republicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnOhioan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 09:15 PM
Response to Original message
12. What is left? More money for the insurance industry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 09:16 PM
Response to Original message
13. No
nothing for me, plenty for the insurance companies like it being mandatory.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 09:18 PM
Response to Original message
15. What's left? Mandates and fines for the middle class and working families nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quiller4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 09:18 PM
Response to Original message
16. Subsidy for low income to purchase insurance, elimination of pre-existing condition clauses
elimination of lifetime caps, expanded Medicaid eligibility-estimates that what remains would cut number of uninsured by more than half
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 09:25 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. Sure, anyone who makes 400% of the FPL or lower will have help
If you are a couple making $58,280 per year, you're gonna pay whatever the hell that insurance cartel wants to charge you. My husband and I had to drop ours when we couldn't afford $1200 per month any more. At $58,280 per year that's 25% of your income. That's more than a house note in some areas. You know any people on that kind of income who could afford a second home?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 10:08 PM
Response to Reply #16
23. there's a cap in at least one of the current versions
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uberblonde Donating Member (993 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 09:44 PM
Response to Original message
19. They're about to drop the medical/loss ratio, too.
This is not reform. There won't be one thing left worth fighting for.

Unless they want to go to reconciliation, this battle is already lost.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
branders seine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 09:47 PM
Response to Original message
20. No.
Truth be told, it was over the moment Obama unilaterally removed single payer even from the discussion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtowngman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 10:15 PM
Response to Reply #20
25. Yep, pulled the string that started the unraveling. And some still call him socialist. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 10:32 PM
Response to Original message
27. No.
Every Amerian will suffer if Obama signs a bill that mandates all American's health into the hands of these uber-corporations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 07:03 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC