Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I am an architect, I am unemployed, I will NOT buy mandated private health insurance...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
never cry wolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 11:16 PM
Original message
I am an architect, I am unemployed, I will NOT buy mandated private health insurance...
Edited on Wed Dec-16-09 11:20 PM by never cry wolf
I had my own firm, but we concentrated in the industrial field... Industry died in 2007... I tried to keep things going and went deep in debt... I am a damn good architect, but not so good at business, my bad... my wife had pneunonia.. pneumococcal pneumonia, the shit that killed jim Henson... Almosst killed my wife, she was in ICU for 31 days.... hospital and rehab for another month... at that time $250,000, about 10 years ago....

I was not able to qualify for health insurance since and I'll be damn'd to give them more money!

On Edit: My point is that I will refuse to give money to the insurance companies!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
beachmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 11:18 PM
Response to Original message
1. If you are unemployed you will receive subsidies to pay for health insurance.
If you have a car, I assume you have car insurance? That is also mandated and there are NO subsidies for that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earth mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 11:26 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. WRONG-there is no mandate to own a car. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shireen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 11:26 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. comparing car ownership and healthcare?!
If absolutely necessary, a person can live without a car.
If critically ill with no health insurance, you die.
Fair comparison?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tonysam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 11:38 PM
Response to Reply #5
12. Most people aren't critically ill. Besides if you don't have a car,
chances are you can't work and you don't eat.

People sure don't understand most people can't be without cars. Public transportation is a JOKE in almost ALL areas of the United States.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 12:55 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. everyone will be critically ill at some point.
you can work without a car. i did it for 20 years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reggie the dog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 03:00 AM
Response to Reply #12
15. Are you crazy?
easily millions of people in the New York City area work and have no car.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arcadian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #12
30. Poor comparison.
There are millions of people without cars in New York, LA, SF, all the major cities.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Citizen Kang Donating Member (424 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 03:05 AM
Response to Reply #5
16. Comparing Car Insurance to Health Insurance
Driving is a privilege not a right. Health care is a right, not a privilege. I know many people who don't own cars, live in a city with mass transportation and therefore are not mandated to have car insurance. Just being alive makes you mandated to have health insurance under this bill. It is unconstitutional.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tansy_Gold Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 11:29 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. I hate that analogy
Depending on where you live, you CAN get by without a car. It's a choice one makes.

You can't choose to live without a body, one that is prone to sickness and injury. Nor do you get to choose the body you live with, whether it comes with "options" you'd rather not have.

Even so, I don't think many of us would balk at the notion of "mandated" insurance if it weren't a huge gift to the private insurance companies. Paying into a common fund -- like Medicare -- that has as its sole purpose the delivery of guaranteed health care to those who need it would be welcomed; playing at the insurance casino where every game is rigged in favor of the house and the house skims 30% off the top isn't so welcome.

I do contract work for several major auto and casualty insurers, and they're not without fault when it comes to paying claims and/or cancelling policies and/or raising rates. But they don't come close to the scumsuckers in the health insurance racket.



TG2012
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tonysam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 11:36 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Not really. The vast majority of the country cannot be without cars
It IS an appropriate analogy.

Many people can and do go without health care, and for many, many years, and without insurance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tansy_Gold Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 12:41 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. Almost any urban area has either some form of mass transit
or has facilities within walking/biking distance. Many people who have cars don't really "need" them; they just choose to have them. And granted, our culture has elevated the automobile to "necessity" status, but it really isn't and could be made less so.

And I said nothing about doing without health care, which is not the same as health insurance. One can pay for insurance and never use it, unless of course health CARE will be mandated, too. It's the thing being insured that's not up to choice.



I criticized Olbermann when he made the same comparison, and considering he doesn't drive, he ought to know better.



TG2012
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Berry Cool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #11
18. Bullshit. I'm 48 years old, have never owned a car
and was gainfully employed for most of my adult life (before my recent unemployment). Good jobs, too. Always had jobs I could get to via public transportation, walking or both.

You do NOT "need" a car. Only Americans seem to be foolish enough to think that lack of personal transportation = inability to hold down a job = death. The rest of the world thinks we are damn fools for acting as if a car is a necessity of life.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lapfog_1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 11:33 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. Good grief.
Driving is an option, are you telling me that living is now optional? If I don't want to buy health insurance I should just off myself?

Not to mention that car insurance can be very very small, mine is about $100 every 6 months, because I don't drive that much and have a perfect driving record, and the car is not insured really, just my liability.

It's a very good risk for the insurance company since I've never had an accident in 35 years of driving where a claim was filed. And only a few tickets, none in the last 5 years.

How does that compare to health insurance?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Journeyman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 11:34 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. When does someone who had their own business become unemployed? . . .
Never Cry Wolf didn't have unemployment insurance, hasn't collected any unemployment benefits, and didn't qualify for Cobra insurance. He did have the pleasure of paying double what you pay for Social Security, but that's just one of the perks of being self-employed -- you get to pick up both your share and the employer's share for your Social Security. Of course, there were no matching funds for a 401K, just what he put in to whatever he could afford.

But, good to know, you equate his wife with maintenance on a Chevy. Of course, maybe he can divorce his car, take public transit, and have a fraction of what he'll need to buy mandated insurance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ipaint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 11:23 PM
Response to Original message
2. And if you can't afford your portion of the costs either now or in the future
as ins. prices continue to rise you will be fined each year you can't pay. Even if you can scrape together your portion you will not be able to get care because co-pays and deductibles are out of reach.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elocs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 11:25 PM
Response to Original message
3. Since at this point in time nothing has passed it is a moot point.
That you are unemployed and the bill passes I would assume there would be some kind of consideration for that. At least you understand the concept of choices and consequences.

So, if people can afford to buy health insurance and choose not to do so, then when they are in need of health care it is ok for them to come and feed off the public trough where those who truly have nothing are forced to go?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 11:28 PM
Response to Original message
6. Oh please - this wonderful bill only demands 167 billion in penalties!
Do you really think this household in opposition can pay every penny of those on our own!

We need your compliance to help us get down below the 166,995,000,000 mark!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pleah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 11:29 PM
Response to Original message
7. This bill will do nothing to help people like me.
We have insurance, but, if we were to get sick we would lose everything. We can't afford to pay the deductables. Plus, the employer based insurance costs a ton of money, taken directly out of the paycheck.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mithreal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 06:35 AM
Response to Original message
17. We need to consider upping our game against the greediest and most amoral
corporations and their enabling elected representatives.

We're a long way from exhausting nonviolent civil disobedience, so anyone out there who feels young needs to learn how to organize and set aside whatever fear he or she has and get to studying and doing. DFA is still a good start.

If not you, then who?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Unvanguard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
19. Do you refuse to pay taxes too, when you object to some of the recipients?
People in society do not have unlimited property rights. Isn't that the basis of most progressive economic thinking?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Posteritatis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #19
26. Mandatory government fees != mandatory private-business fees. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Unvanguard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. In this case, they amount to the same thing.
For instance, the rules making employer health insurance plans tax-deductible--ironically, something many opponents of the Senate bill want to maintain--in effect mandate that labor compensation funds go to health insurance instead of direct wages/salary, on pain of paying a penalty (the tax costs that would have otherwise been deducted).

Moving in the other direction, the penalty is effectively a universal increase in the income tax, and the purchase of health insurance is a way to get that increase deducted from one's taxes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Unvanguard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #26
29. Duplicate. n/t
Edited on Thu Dec-17-09 01:30 PM by Unvanguard
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
20. Then you will not have insurance
If you get sick, pay your medical bills out of pocket.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #20
21. Eh, he doesn't have insurance now..
What part of that didn't you understand?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #21
23. He refuses to buy it due to the mandate
So he still won't have it. And will have to pay his bills out of pocket.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #23
27. He doesn't have any money, his business went bust..
No money means no insurance.. Mandates or not.

Are you OK with people being turned away at the ER?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 11:18 AM
Response to Original message
22. this country needs health care, not health insurance.
why is it so hard for so many to think outside the 'health insurance' box? fuck insurance companies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proudohioan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #22
25. AGREED!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smirkymonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #22
31. Thank You!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-18-09 05:14 PM
Response to Reply #22
32. What you say needs to be said again and again. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 11:35 AM
Response to Original message
24. Elizabeth Cohen on CNN just did a little feel good piece about
what is in the health care bill. One of her examples was someone she called "Heart Attack Harry" who will now be able to get coverage despite a pre-existing condition. In her example, Harry makes $43,000 a year and qualifies for a $700 subsidy (whoop-di-fucking-doo). She said although it wasn't much, Harry would now be able to get a policy for $4,000. HUH?????? Maybe if Harry gets in a time machine and goes back a decade.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 06:13 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC