Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

$10 Billion More for Community Health Centers will Revolutionize Care (Bernie Sanders)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
MH1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-19-09 10:50 PM
Original message
$10 Billion More for Community Health Centers will Revolutionize Care (Bernie Sanders)
Looks like Sanders thinks the good outweighs the bad in the HCR bill.

http://www.commondreams.org/newswire/2009/12/19-0

WASHINGTON - December 19 - A $10 billion investment in community health centers, expected to go to $14 billion when Congress completes work on health care reform legislation, was included in a final series of changes to the Senate bill unveiled today.

The provision, which would provide primary care for 25 million more Americans, was requested by Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.).

He said the additional resources will help bring about a revolution in primary health care in America and create new or expanded health centers in an additional 10,000 communities. The provision would also provide loan repayments and scholarships through the National Health Service Corps to create an additional 20,000 primary care doctors, dentists, nurse practitioners, physician assistants and mental health professionals.

Very importantly, Sanders also said the provision would save Medicaid tens of billions of dollars by keeping patients out of emergency rooms and hospitals by providing primary care when then needed it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-19-09 10:54 PM
Response to Original message
1. It's so hard to craft useful stuff like this?
He's making them all looklike ass holes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-19-09 11:55 PM
Response to Original message
2. I don't understand what these are. Are they under the rural health provision?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 08:19 AM
Response to Reply #2
14. Here:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. Sounds like Kaiser except that I think Kaiser is doctor-owned and
run for the most part. Kaiser is an excellent system. It is big enough to provide all the care you need.

Unfortunately, the health care bill that is now proposed does away with Medicare Advantage so we probably won't be able to enroll in Kaiser any more. I'm really upset about that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ozymanithrax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 12:05 AM
Response to Original message
3. Bernie Sanders is a progressive, and knows what is possible...
I admire that man, but hope he can dodge the bus.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 12:22 AM
Response to Original message
4. Good for you Bernie
Get as many positive changes you can get before it's too late.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 12:32 AM
Response to Original message
5. Well I'm a bit more optimistic (or maybe I should say less bummed) if Bernie
sees some good in this.

I'm so weary of the whole thing. I just want it to be done and over.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rollingrock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 12:54 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. That's pretty much the Senate and lobbyist strategy
they will wear you down to the point that you accept virtually any watered-down turd they want to pass just to get it over with. it seems to be a very effective strategy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 02:17 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. Yeah, I get that, but when somebody I trust presents such a view, I'm willing
to give it some thought. (Not that it matters what I think, anyway.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 12:34 AM
Response to Original message
6. Bernie's in, Sherrod's in, Weiner's in
then I'm in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pleah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 12:49 AM
Response to Original message
7.  Mandates and women's rights are the trade off?
Edited on Sun Dec-20-09 12:51 AM by pleah
oh, that's worth it. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MH1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 08:14 AM
Response to Reply #7
12. I feel much better about the Nelson "compromise" after I saw Coburn and Hutchinson
whining about it on c-span last night. They talked about all the "horrible" (read for us, good, or at least less bad) ways it reverses Stupak.

Of course the key takeaway from their raving was that even if the House puts Stupak back in, they still won't support the bill. In other words, Dems have nothing to gain by caving in conference on this.

Mandates - I feel better about those given:

* the reasonable subsidies make it less likely to be burdensome on most people (the remaining issue is that it is also subsidizing the insurance companies. But that's just another front in a battle that's been long ago lost in this country. See: Military Industrial Complex, Prison Industrial Complex, health insurance lobby in general ... just for starters.)

* that some differential based on age is allowed. This will reduce the cost to younger people, who are most likely to be affected by mandates. And as long as you follow an insurance model, it only makes sense that higher-risk populations should pay more. (Health care should NOT follow an insurance model in my opinion. But as long as it does and that part isn't going to change any time soon, we can improve the way that model works.)

* plus the cost-margin ratio or whatever the heck it's called being limited to 85% (not the 90 we wanted but a damn sight better than what it is today). This means that profits to the insurance companies are limited. So they will get more subscribers but not be able to make as much money off each subscriber.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rollingrock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 01:02 AM
Response to Original message
9. This is what I don't get
from the article

"Open to everyone, the centers care for patients covered by Medicaid, Medicare and private insurance as well as those who have no insurance."

so I think the logical question becomes, why are there mandates to purchase private health insurance if anyone can get free healthcare at one of these community centers? can't you opt out of private insurance by simply taking advantage of one of these public facilities?

(I've never heard of these places myself. are they limited to rural areas? if so, they wouldn't be very helpful to the majority of us urban dwellers.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smalll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 01:02 AM
Response to Original message
10. That sounds great! $10 billion will provide primary care for 25 million Americans?
Edited on Sun Dec-20-09 01:02 AM by smalll
Why don't we spend somewhat over $100 billion dollars and invest in community centers to provide primary care to EVERY American??? The cost of this monstrous bill is supposed to be over $800 billion dollars.

Seems like we could actually provide REAL health care for Americans by DIRECTLY subsidizing health care centers, doctors, nurses, and other health care workers. Instead, we are going to funnel hundreds of billions of dollars to the goddamn "insurance" companies, so they can skim even more off the top.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rollingrock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 11:50 AM
Response to Reply #10
15. It sounds great, but who wants to bet it will probably die in committee?
just as they killed the state single-payer option and killed the public option, and most recently the Medicare buy-in....whatever the liberal democrats start hyping up, eventually gets killed because they always ending up caving in. there seems to be a very distinct and utterly predictable pattern here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cornermouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 08:18 AM
Response to Original message
13. Around here they have urgent care clinics.
Edited on Sun Dec-20-09 08:21 AM by cornermouse
Let me see if I have this right.

First stop - community health centers
Second stop - urgent care clinics
Third stop - ER
Fourth stop - inpatient

It seems to me that there is a little bit of redundancy involved here...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 11:46 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC