Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Where does the majority of DU stand on the healthcare legislation?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 05:45 AM
Original message
Poll question: Where does the majority of DU stand on the healthcare legislation?
I'll put this really simply:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SemiCharmedQuark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 06:00 AM
Response to Original message
1. Not sure yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kahuna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 06:03 AM
Response to Original message
2. Not sure yet. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
old mark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 06:38 AM
Response to Original message
3. Wait and see - there may be some good to come out of it when the
final bill comes out, and I believe it would have been much worse with no bill passed.

The republicans are irate, so there must be something good there.
The republicans are very afraid that this will be even moderately successful and that Obama and the Dems will pull some better poll numbers out of this mess and seriously beat the GOP in the upcoming elections. The republicans don't give a shit about health care, only votes.

mark
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 06:44 AM
Response to Original message
4. Let's just say that I'm glad Howard Dean didn't have anything to do with this fiasco
He'll be one of the few who comes out of this with his reputation intact.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaxx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 06:52 AM
Response to Original message
5. Much better than doing nothing.
The door has been opened and there is much good in the bill. Most knew it would be a hard fight, and not everything would be in the bill...but for those who will be insured now, for those with preexisting conditions, and for those who were told 'sorry we don't cover that', the bill is monumental.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Union Yes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 06:53 AM
Response to Original message
6. I keep telling myself that it's a babystep toward HC reform but I have nothing to back that up. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 06:55 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. The only things I have are the expansion of the
CHCs and my own personal experience with private insurance subsidized and administered by the state.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tejas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 06:58 AM
Response to Original message
8. Kiss the majority goodbye next November.
1994 all over again.


I mean really, 1am?

They are fooling who?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 07:00 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. crystal balls are not reliable. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tejas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 07:09 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. Your cliche is useless too, try reading history, say.....1994 elections
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DailyGrind51 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 06:58 AM
Response to Original message
9. I am witholding judgement until the final Senate and House bills are merged.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laelth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 08:11 AM
Response to Original message
11. Definitely worse than doing nothing.

Kill the bill.


Forcing people to buy insurance is no more the answer to a failed health care system than forcing people to buy houses is the solution to homelessness.

:dem:

-Laelth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
invictus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 08:29 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stray cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 08:31 AM
Response to Original message
13. Unlike many self-perceived experts on DU - I don't know
Edited on Mon Dec-21-09 08:34 AM by stray cat
If you are just above the poverty line - you now get Medicaid or get insurance paid for by subsidies, the regulations on insurance co are good eventhough they could go further. I don't think it will be revenue neutral and I think it politically is a real loser because people want free health care and not mandates that could cost some serious cash for those without subsidies.

I have a good health care plan through work - so I'm thinking more about those it helps. As long as I'm employed and don't get a serious health problem I'm good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 08:43 AM
Response to Original message
14. Consider The Alternative...
...the status quo. If you're happy with the current system, then yesterday was a big loss. While the final bill still isn't done, there will be coverage available for many who don't have any insurance now and profit caps...plus with the subsidies, many more will be able to get some type of coverage in the near future and have the government pay for some of it. More important is the money set aside for 10,000 clinics that are the stepping stones to a national system...a place where people can go for preventative care and, if successful, will lead the push for an eventual single payer system. There's more here than many give credit for and does address the important need to expand coverage rather than constrict it.

No matter what type of healtcare reform was passed, someone was going to have to pay for it. If your employer no longer has to contribute, then who? Seems some believed that single payer or public option would have meant free care or almost zero premiums. Truth is you'd still have to pay in and it would go to a new set of government beaurucrats who would play gatekeepers just as the insurance companies do. The essence was to create competition and that's still the goal. It's a lot easier with thousands of clinics up and operating than with what current exists or anything the rushpublicans would come up with.

Not a good bill...but there are good things within that will help many in need.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 06:40 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC