|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
walldude (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-21-09 03:40 PM Original message |
Medicare buy in.. NOW! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftstreet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-21-09 03:42 PM Response to Original message |
1. How would a medicare buy in protect Insurance/Pharma profits? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BrklynLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-21-09 03:42 PM Response to Original message |
2. but... but. then the Insurance companies and Big Pharma and the lobbyists |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
glinda (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-21-09 04:01 PM Response to Reply #2 |
22. their insane profits then should be no problem if we were to get Medicare or something like it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
T Wolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-21-09 03:42 PM Response to Original message |
3. Obvious answer is tht most in either party DO NOT want to improve medical care in this country. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rudy23 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-21-09 03:44 PM Response to Original message |
4. If Obama doesn't want it, it doesn't matter what our elected Congress wants |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheWraith (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-21-09 03:52 PM Response to Reply #4 |
15. Bullshit. The problem was always the Senate. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rudy23 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-21-09 03:57 PM Response to Reply #15 |
20. The problem was Joe Lieberman----and what did the President do to confront that problem? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
walldude (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-21-09 04:09 PM Response to Reply #20 |
25. Lieberman killed the "expansion" not this buy in. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rudy23 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-21-09 04:35 PM Response to Reply #25 |
26. Good catch. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
no limit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-21-09 03:44 PM Response to Original message |
5. How is expanding medicare defecit neutral? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dmallind (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-21-09 03:46 PM Response to Reply #5 |
6. My thouught too - would only work with significant premiums or tax raises. NT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
walldude (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-21-09 03:49 PM Response to Reply #6 |
9. No taxes are needed and the premiums would be much less that what |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BrklynLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-21-09 03:52 PM Response to Reply #6 |
13. Current Medicare deduction is 1.45%. Make it 1.75% or even 2% |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
walldude (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-21-09 03:59 PM Response to Reply #13 |
21. Exactly.. this is a flawless plan. It solves every problem except |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dmallind (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-21-09 04:01 PM Response to Reply #13 |
23. Well double that really - employers pay too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
walldude (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-21-09 03:47 PM Response to Reply #5 |
7. It's a buy in... not an expansion. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BrklynLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-21-09 03:49 PM Response to Reply #7 |
11. Could we get rid of the FICA cap and use some of those funs for this as well? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
walldude (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-21-09 03:52 PM Response to Reply #11 |
14. I don't know about the FICA cap but this would not be a "deduction" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cliffordu (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-21-09 03:49 PM Response to Reply #5 |
10. Isn't there a maximum pay in right now that for the rich is a complete |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BrklynLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-21-09 03:50 PM Response to Reply #10 |
12. There is a FICA cap...Medicare deductions are separate..but that percentage could be raised. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
walldude (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-21-09 03:54 PM Response to Reply #12 |
16. Ok I think I get what you are saying.. that's what I meant when I said |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BrklynLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-21-09 03:56 PM Response to Reply #16 |
18. Right. There is a FICA cap now.,,but Medicare of 1.75% is paid on entire income. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cliffordu (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-21-09 03:47 PM Response to Original message |
8. I expect to see something like this next - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
walldude (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-21-09 03:57 PM Response to Reply #8 |
19. This is what is pissing me off. THe only reason not to do this is because |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cliffordu (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-21-09 04:01 PM Response to Reply #19 |
24. That's what I meant - through reconciliation..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truedelphi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-21-09 03:55 PM Response to Original message |
17. As it is now, any fifty something who wants to can buy into |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
walldude (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-21-09 04:36 PM Response to Original message |
27. kick... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ladyhawk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-21-09 04:38 PM Response to Original message |
28. Sure. Give me the necessary money and I will. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
walldude (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-21-09 07:53 PM Response to Reply #28 |
30. For people like you there are subsidies covered by slight increases |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
walldude (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-21-09 07:21 PM Response to Original message |
29. . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Mon May 06th 2024, 05:15 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC