Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Medicare buy in.. NOW!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
walldude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 03:40 PM
Original message
Medicare buy in.. NOW!
Edited on Mon Dec-21-09 03:59 PM by walldude
The fact is that they could pass a Medicare buy in for everyone with 51 votes. It's an existing program, it would be deficit neutral and because it's an existing program it can pass as a budget reconciliation with 51 votes and there would be no need for any Blue Dog or Republican support. Plus the baggers get to keep their crappy for profit insurance without having their taxes increased to cover health care.

Not to mention they could win back the base while telling Republicans to shove it up their ass. So why do I keep hearing that this bill is the best we can do and I should just wait and they will fix it later?


And yes I got this from Thom Hartmann, he's been saying it for months. I researched it and could not find any flaws in his argument.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 03:42 PM
Response to Original message
1. How would a medicare buy in protect Insurance/Pharma profits?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 03:42 PM
Response to Original message
2. but... but. then the Insurance companies and Big Pharma and the lobbyists
Edited on Mon Dec-21-09 03:45 PM by BrklynLiberal
would not be able to make obscene amounts of money!!!!

Too simple, too logical, too easy...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #2
22. their insane profits then should be no problem if we were to get Medicare or something like it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
T Wolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 03:42 PM
Response to Original message
3. Obvious answer is tht most in either party DO NOT want to improve medical care in this country.
The people that deserve good medical care already get it because they are wealthy enough. The rest of us can go pound dirt, eventually from the underside.

The Medicare buy-in would work too well. That is why it was killed.

Plus, they would not want to upset the "good friends" across the aisle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rudy23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 03:44 PM
Response to Original message
4. If Obama doesn't want it, it doesn't matter what our elected Congress wants
We had the numbers for a lot more than medicare buy-in. Unfortunately, the executive branch twisted arms and whittled the bill down to their liking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #4
15. Bullshit. The problem was always the Senate.
You're rewriting reality because you want to be pissed at Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rudy23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #15
20. The problem was Joe Lieberman----and what did the President do to confront that problem?
Nothing? He actually threw his support behind Lieberman when the buy-in was getting stripped out?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
walldude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #20
25. Lieberman killed the "expansion" not this buy in.
And this isn't just for those over 55 it's for all. And the reason it's not being discussed is it's a sensible real world solution that will help the people not the insurance companies. The people who are defending this bill and calling people like me whiners? You don't see them in this thread because there is no possible way that a person with a lick of sense could argue that this wouldn't work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rudy23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. Good catch.
Edited on Mon Dec-21-09 04:35 PM by rudy23
Still a clear indicator of who was shaping the bill, IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no limit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 03:44 PM
Response to Original message
5. How is expanding medicare defecit neutral?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dmallind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 03:46 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. My thouught too - would only work with significant premiums or tax raises. NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
walldude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. No taxes are needed and the premiums would be much less that what
Edited on Mon Dec-21-09 03:51 PM by walldude
you are paying to a for profit company. Of course with this plan you would have the option of keeping your current rip-off, I mean policy.

This is actually a very effective and simple solution and the numbers have already been gone over many times. Check out Thom Hartmanns site I'm sure he's still got this up there somewhere.


People need to stop making fucking excuses and realize that they are being fucked here, this isn't some fantasy this is a real world useable solution that the politicians are avoiding because they are in the pockets of the insurance industry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #6
13. Current Medicare deduction is 1.45%. Make it 1.75% or even 2%
Edited on Mon Dec-21-09 03:54 PM by BrklynLiberal
Still a hell of a lot less than current insurance premiums...

EDIT: Make the increase in deduction optional..so if you want in on the universal Medicare, you can have it. If not...pay your 12-20% premiums to insurance companies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
walldude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #13
21. Exactly.. this is a flawless plan. It solves every problem except
continuing to get huge donations from the insurance industry. And from where I stand that's not a problem at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dmallind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #13
23. Well double that really - employers pay too
In thoery I'm not opposed to this plan by the way. I liked the idea when originally floated. I like the idea of expanding medicare's risk pool, and also leveragung their low overhead. I'm willing to bet this will slowly be introduced eventually.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
walldude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 03:47 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. It's a buy in... not an expansion.
You pay for it just like insurance. Only because profit is removed from the equation the cost is significantly lowered. Plus you add a small amount to the premiums of people making a certain amount of money to help offset the costs for people living below the poverty line.

Any more questions?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. Could we get rid of the FICA cap and use some of those funs for this as well?
Or increase the Medicare deduction that everyone has taken out of their salary?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
walldude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. I don't know about the FICA cap but this would not be a "deduction"
you would be paying premiums just like you do to an insurance company. People are aren't in the program wouldn't pay anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. Isn't there a maximum pay in right now that for the rich is a complete
theft of the program??

I mean a maximum while working of a couple hundred a month??

Raise the ceiling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. There is a FICA cap...Medicare deductions are separate..but that percentage could be raised.
Edited on Mon Dec-21-09 03:50 PM by BrklynLiberal
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
walldude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. Ok I think I get what you are saying.. that's what I meant when I said
people who make a certain amount of money would pay a slightly higher premium to offset the cost of subsidies for the poor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. Right. There is a FICA cap now.,,but Medicare of 1.75% is paid on entire income.
Edited on Mon Dec-21-09 03:56 PM by BrklynLiberal
There are a few options that could be used to increase the income to cover Medicare for all ..and the increases could be optional to those who are interested.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 03:47 PM
Response to Original message
8. I expect to see something like this next -
There was actually a D senator that was talking about this a couple months ago.- split the effort into two parts - pass the new stuff the hard way like they are doing now - THEN extend medicare through reconciliation.


There was a brief flurry of activity concerning this and then it strangely dropped from sight. It is the ONE thing they can do to rehabilitate the party and redeem themselves.

Oh, yeah and strip that god damned abortion clause from the new bill.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
walldude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #8
19. This is what is pissing me off. THe only reason not to do this is because
it puts a dent in insurance company profits. Even the baggers can't complain because it costs them nothing and they get to keep buying the CEO of AETNA a new yacht every year. And if I'm not mistaken they can pass the medicare buy in through a different budget reconciliation, it doesn't need to have anything to do with the HRC bill. Although I'm not 100% on that..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #19
24. That's what I meant - through reconciliation.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 03:55 PM
Response to Original message
17. As it is now, any fifty something who wants to can buy into
Edited on Mon Dec-21-09 03:55 PM by truedelphi
Medicare, just by thumbing their nose at the statiticians and living to be 65!

That is all ya gotta do to get in to MediCare!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
walldude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 04:36 PM
Response to Original message
27. kick...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ladyhawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 04:38 PM
Response to Original message
28. Sure. Give me the necessary money and I will. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
walldude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 07:53 PM
Response to Reply #28
30. For people like you there are subsidies covered by slight increases
in premiums for the more well off. So you'd be in as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
walldude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 07:21 PM
Response to Original message
29. .
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 05:15 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC