Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

CNN: Public option may be dropped from final health care bill

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-28-09 06:20 PM
Original message
CNN: Public option may be dropped from final health care bill
Washington (CNN) -- House Democrats are signaling that a final health care bill will drop the government-run public health insurance option favored by liberals but rejected by conservatives from both parties.

A House-Senate conference committee will begin negotiations next month on merging health care bills passed by the Democratic majorities in each chamber.

However, voting in both chambers was extremely close, raising concerns that a compromise might fail to win the necessary final approval.

http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/12/28/health.care/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
niyad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-28-09 06:21 PM
Response to Original message
1. gee, does this come as a surprise to anyone?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-28-09 06:22 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Well, after all, nobody actually campaigned on the public option
:silly:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-28-09 06:41 PM
Response to Reply #3
21. No one campaigned on single payer, public option, or repeal of DADT, DOMA
The entire 2007-2008 campaign was an illusion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
highplainsdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-28-09 06:49 PM
Response to Reply #3
23. And the nobody who didn't campaign on it actually worked against it behind the scenes (link):
Edited on Mon Dec-28-09 06:58 PM by highplainsdem
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
inna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-28-09 07:21 PM
Response to Reply #23
34. thanks for this link.

it's an oldie but definitely a goody.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-28-09 06:21 PM
Response to Original message
2. Like there was any hope for it to be included in this reactionary Congress. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-28-09 07:35 PM
Response to Reply #2
35. Unfortunately correct. Without 60 votes in the senate, we were going to end up here regardless.
I wouldn't call the current congress "reactionary" by any means, but the problem is the 60 vote requirement to end debate in the Senate. As long as the Republicans, even the "moderates," are falling in line behind the "obstruct everything" strategy it means that we need every single Democrat on board with every single initiative, and one or two objectors can pretty much get a line item veto.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Owl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-28-09 06:22 PM
Response to Original message
4. "conservatives from both parties" suck.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CrownPrinceBandar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-28-09 06:22 PM
Response to Original message
5. Color me surprised...............
not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-28-09 06:22 PM
Response to Original message
6. ........because with 60 senators we STILL let the Repukes haul us around
by the neck.........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigwillq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-28-09 06:23 PM
Response to Original message
7. Wow, what a shock.
NOT! :mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-28-09 06:23 PM
Response to Original message
8. Our Corp-gress at work...
:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobbolink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-28-09 06:24 PM
Response to Original message
9. "Hope/Change you can believe in".
Edited on Mon Dec-28-09 06:25 PM by bobbolink
:nuke:

Followed by the news that Congressional Democrats have turned their backs on homeless people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-28-09 06:25 PM
Response to Original message
10. yeah, strip out that pesky public option... just keep the mandates for all
yeah! :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
clear eye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-28-09 06:25 PM
Response to Original message
11. Louis Slaughter, for one, won't vote for it
and I wonder about Marcy Kaptur, and Anthony Weiner, and many others who promised their constituents that there would be no mandate w/o a public option.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nite Owl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-28-09 06:34 PM
Response to Reply #11
20. They will probably pick up
enough of the Blue Dogs instead. After all that's what they really wanted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-28-09 07:00 PM
Response to Reply #11
26. Barbara Lee's out as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-28-09 06:26 PM
Response to Original message
12. 'conservatives from both parties'
funny how you never hear about liberal republicans..well, not really funny
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-28-09 06:27 PM
Response to Original message
13. As suckspected
Even knowing this was going to happen, it's still annoying as crap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
villager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-28-09 06:30 PM
Response to Original message
14. Does the "Public Option" lobby have more money than the insurance co's?
I know -- a rhetorical question....

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-28-09 06:31 PM
Response to Original message
15. Go ahead (stupid party).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-28-09 06:31 PM
Response to Original message
16. I "hoped" for "change"
Are we there yet?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-28-09 06:31 PM
Response to Original message
17. We were taken on a merry ride weren't we?
Yet, I'm pretty certain the final outcome was decided back in July and August in back rooms with all the insurance and big PhRMA donors present. What a disgusting bunch of multi-millionaires and billionaires we were told to vote for and who are holding tax-payers hostage for their further enrichment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shagbark Hickory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-28-09 06:33 PM
Response to Original message
18. What will be interesting to see is what happens with opening up medicaid to lower middle income ppl.
Edited on Mon Dec-28-09 06:33 PM by Shagbark Hickory
PEople seem to be forgetting that Medicaid is supposed to be opened up to ppl 300% of poverty. This could include a lot of people, even middle class people that just don't earn a ton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
clear eye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-28-09 06:56 PM
Response to Reply #18
24. Do you know what Medicaid is like?
It will be interesting to see how they deal w/ the shock of the life-threatening inadequacy of the coverage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shagbark Hickory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 10:21 AM
Response to Reply #24
41. No, I don't. I never qualified for it BUT it seems like it's accepted virtually everywhere m-care is
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-28-09 06:34 PM
Response to Original message
19. Didn't we predict this? Abortion restrictions to remain as well
The defenders of the Senate's LieberCare told us in their faith-based confidence that this monstrosity would be modified in conference.

Sure, we said!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressIn2008 Donating Member (848 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-28-09 06:45 PM
Response to Original message
22. One country for the rich; one country for the poor. So it goes. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-28-09 06:59 PM
Response to Original message
25. Sooo glad President Fierce Advocate rolled up his sleeves for the final negotiations
:banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Davis_X_Machina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-28-09 07:06 PM
Response to Original message
27. The Hebrew for 'public option' is 'shibboleth'... n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
clear eye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-28-09 07:11 PM
Response to Reply #27
29. A buzzword?
How so?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Davis_X_Machina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-28-09 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #29
32. At its last reported size --
-- small enough to pass both Houses, untethered from Medicare's pricing structure, more expensive than private plans offered on the same exchange, and unavailable to nearly everyone, yes.

It's now just a bright shiny thing for us to chase. Nothing more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-28-09 07:06 PM
Response to Original message
28. ALL according to plan, my pretties.
The Corporate Owners arranged a little Kabuki Theater to entertain the Peasant Class while they robbed the Treasury again.


Now don't fret.
There is absolutely NOTHING you could have done to stop them.
You might as well just get used to it.
Your whining and complaining and dying doesn't matter one whit to these people (your owners).
Hahahahahahahahahahaha!

ALL according to plan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
highplainsdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-28-09 07:20 PM
Response to Reply #28
33. True, as Glenn Greenwald explained months ago:
http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/2009/08/19/obama/index.html

The attempt to attract GOP support was the pretext which Democrats used to compromise continuously and water down the bill. But -- given the impossibility of achieving that goal -- isn't it fairly obvious that a desire for GOP support wasn't really the reason the Democrats were constantly watering down their own bill? Given the White House's central role in negotiating a secret deal with the pharmaceutical industry, its betrayal of Obama's clear promise to conduct negotiations out in the open (on C-SPAN no less), Rahm's protection of Blue Dogs and accompanying attacks on progressives, and the complete lack of any pressure exerted on allegedly obstructionists "centrists," it seems rather clear that the bill has been watered down, and the "public option" jettisoned, because that's the bill they want -- this was the plan all along.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Desertrose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-28-09 07:13 PM
Response to Original message
30. Of course it will be dropped....
never thought it wouldn't be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikki Stone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-28-09 07:13 PM
Response to Original message
31. The last chance for this health insurance bill to have some semblance of decency
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratefultobelib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-28-09 07:56 PM
Response to Original message
36. How do they get around Lieberman?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-28-09 08:16 PM
Response to Reply #36
37. If you don't know by now,
I would be wasting my time trying to explain.
The easiest and most obvious:
Lieberman has demonstrated that he has a price.
BUY him.

If that doesn't WORK:
Lieberman has demonstrated that he is a coward.
Scare him.

Lieberman has demonstrates that his vanity is ALL important to him.
Threaten to expose him.

"Lieberman" is just the most recent in a long line of excuses the Democrats are continuing to hide behind for failing to implement a "Democratic" agenda, and to NOT do the things the PEOPLE voted them into office to do.

Lieberman is NOT a "Superman".
Lieberman IS a merely an "excuse".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratefultobelib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-28-09 09:01 PM
Response to Reply #37
38. Oh--I didn't realize it was that easy. Silly me!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rudy23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-28-09 09:01 PM
Response to Original message
39. "Liberals" = representatives of 70% of the country.
But good thing those damn liberals stopped their whining.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kansas Wyatt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-28-09 09:11 PM
Response to Original message
40. The names of everyone who sold out or will sell out the American People...
Because the worthless fucking whores need to be shamed and shunned from society for failing to represent the American People.

Either they stand with the American People or they stand with Corporate America.
That is the bottom line!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC