Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Immigration Reform "Next On The Agenda"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Motown_Johnny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:43 PM
Original message
Poll question: Immigration Reform "Next On The Agenda"

MSNBC is reporting that Immigration Reform is "Next on The Hill" and some DUers are posting that Reid and Pelosi both want it to be next.



In an election year, should this issue be addressed?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Overseas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yes it can be addressed if we want to continue pandering to the right wing.//nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cant trust em Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
2. It shouldn't be addressed during a time of high unemployment.
My opposition to having it be next isn't because it's an election cycle, but this is not the right time based on the economic conditions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Motown_Johnny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Just to play devil's advocate
Edited on Wed Dec-30-09 12:51 PM by Motown_Johnny
it could be argued that documenting workers and getting them and their employers to pay taxes could be helpful to the economy.

It could also help obscure the numbers if you suddenly add X million workers to the rolls.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cant trust em Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #4
13. You don't have to convince me.
I work for a Latino economic development agency. There are thousands of underground entrepreneurs that if we brought them into the mainstream they could get access to capital and drive real economic growth.

But the second that this gets introduced the "we're giving American jobs to foreigners" rhetoric will pick up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlphaCentauri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. It has been that way in good or bad times
during the good time Xenos argued that there was an invasion, they'll just pickup the rhetoric of the day to make noise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlphaCentauri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
3. Yes fix the system
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:53 PM
Response to Original message
5. Other:
After the health insurance reform debacle, I'm not sure I want this conference attempting any more "reforms."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Motown_Johnny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. and if we take large losses in the mid term do you want that conference
Edited on Wed Dec-30-09 12:57 PM by Motown_Johnny
attempting reforms?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. That congress wouldn't need to attempt "reforms."
The current system already benefits them.

Using a Democratic Congress to push forward "reforms" that benefit corporate power-holders under the guise of "democratic" reforms can be worse than the already bad status quo.

See HCR.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
evan2 Donating Member (49 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. HReform is intimately tied to so-called immigration reform

Those who profit from high immigration rates want to make sure that those folks are REQUIRED to buy insurance. They (the rich) certainly have no intention of bearing any of the social costs of millions of new people coming here year after year. THAT (the social
costs) is the little people's problem, not theirs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 02:09 PM
Response to Reply #5
15. I get the feeling their "reform" will mean more outsourced labor and more H1B's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. I've got the feeling
that I won't like whatever "reform" they attempt. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hello_Kitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-31-09 12:49 AM
Response to Reply #15
23. Yep. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
evan2 Donating Member (49 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:56 PM
Response to Original message
7. What is your definition of "reform"? IMO, it means corporate
America will then have cheap labor that will be here legally, so they won't have to worry about replacing those who now
might be deported.

It also means the continued expansion of the high costs that the rest of endure as the result of millions of new people coming here
every year. WE will be told we're racists or worse if we support efforts to raise wages here and keep the cost of housing (especially
rentals), food, energy etc. reasonable. Everyone likes to be thought of as being humanitarian, but the people who profit from
millions of additional people coming here year after year could care less about THAT.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Motown_Johnny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. I am simply parroting what was reported. I don't think my definition matters
but my definition differs from yours only slightly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enrique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
8. other: it's not true
immigration reform won't be addressed next year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Edweird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 01:04 PM
Response to Original message
12. Gluttons for punishment huh?
I personally would rather they not 'fix' anything else. Especially since they aren't listening or keeping their word.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thickasabrick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 02:36 PM
Response to Original message
17. The only focus should be jobs and the economy until those are
looking better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Motown_Johnny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 07:45 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. I think you/we need to walk and chew gum at the same time
You/we need to make the point that we work on the economy and jobs every day, but that we also focus on other issues.

Since most anything domestic can be spun into affecting the economy and/or jobs in some fashion it isn't hard to do.

Clearly the problem of undocumented workers can be seen as a jobs issue and the taxes that are not being paid can be seen as a deficit/economic issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thickasabrick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 08:47 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. We have already pissed off enough people around healthcare. The
immigration issue is toxic and should not be attempted until his second term....unless you really want him to be a one termer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigwillq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 07:46 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. I agree
Edited on Wed Dec-30-09 07:47 PM by bigwillq
I think it's possible to focus on more than one thing. I guess it just depends on what they mean by "reform". I think the system is broken (not to sound cliched or anything) but I think it might be better to work on changing some things that are wrong with the system instead of trying to push through a sweeping reform bill at this time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thickasabrick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 08:50 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. The economy first and foremost should be the focus. That encompasses
credit, credit cards, financial reform, dealing with the foreclosure crisis and my favorite subject - lobbying reform....if they have time - which they won't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
classysassy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-31-09 12:41 AM
Response to Original message
22. Not until
we start treat Canada the way we treat Mexico.Screw all the latino haters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 02:46 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC